[–] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Oof, I see how that can hit a sensitive spot. I mostly meant it in a positive sense, that even a short thing can be important. But of course it also has the other side, sadly. However, here comes the importance about the monsters part: the good days are still not a lie.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    I'll share (a crude translation of) a piece of song lyrics. It has two great nuggets of wisdom right next to each other!

    "There are no meaningless days Or if there are the whole life is So useless that it's better not To think about it today

    And I suppose it won't be a punishment If we go together for a while When we turn out to be monsters Will the good days be a lie even then?"

    The first part, for me, is about the meaning of life. How it must come from within and how it is in every moment. The second part is good relationship advice, in my opinion. Duration does not equal quality or significance. (The monsters part I don't consider that important, but for some it may be.) And these points work well together. The meaning is in the moments.

    The song is Sielunvihollinen by CMX.

  • source
  •  

    Recently, I finally started a hobby I've been thinking about for a long time, i.e., designing my own map projections. This one has such a simple but clever idea that I wouldn't be surprised to hear it's an already known one.

    Basically, longitude is scaled by the cosine of the corresponding latitude, like in the sinusoidal projection. But then latitude is scaled by its own sine to avoid those sharp poles (and to emphasize the areas near the equator), and a constant to make it a circle.

    So, does anyone know a pre-existing name for this? Alternatively, feel free to suggest a new name for it.

    [–] 4 points 9 months ago

    Yes, you are mostly correct. In some sense, it is more a cultural thing. If your Arch breaks, the expectations for your ability to deal with it yourself are a bit higher. There are good instructions and people willing to help, but the latter (both inside and outside of Arch community, I think) may tell you that you shouldn't be using Arch if you don't meet their expectations.

    Anyway, another aspect of it is the fact that with my system, I am a bit of a tinkerer.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 year ago

    Suomi mainittu, torilla tavataan!

    Anyways, this is a really good translation, although all those "spread" things could use more idiomatic single-word translations. I applaud!

    Vocative is an interesting thing. When I first read about it, I dismissed it as useless. However, since then I have used it in my largest conlang project Shiofaioth (linked to in another comment) and also here, because it's just so nice.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 year ago

    Thank you for your interest! There are couple of ways in which I try to accomplish that goal. First is the verbal pre- and postpositions, which force you to be open about your sources and the degree of voluntariness of what you describe (of course nothing prevents straight up lying, but at least whatever you claim is explicit and ready for inspection). There's another thing that I now realize I haven't even documented yet, even though it has been one of my main ideas. That is the lack of single word ways to say one "must" or "should" or "may" do something, with the expection being taht you explicitly say who orders or allows the action. Of course there are always ways to go around this, but the aim is that if you try to hide authority behind words, it would be clunky and noticeable.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 year ago

    I applaud your effort in translating that. Your translation does not perfectly match my original intentions, but it is close, and I guess there is supposed to be a subjective aspect to these things.

    Anyway, I'll send you a link to our Discord.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    So, I've been toying with this idea of applying the anarchist concept of means ends unity to art (to be honest, mainly as a theoretical justification for doing what I wanted to do anyway). So, if you want to do art, and especially anarchist art, shouldn't your tools also be artistic and preferably anarchist?

    I'll give an example. Poetry is art. Tools of poetry include things like language and font. Constructed languages can be seen as art projects, and they can implement and emphasize the values of anarchism. Fonts are also art projects and they can for example be inspired by anarchism and be freely distributed etc.

    Other examples could include making specific image manipulation programs and algorithms and creating new image formats for visual arts, making esoteric programming languages for programs etc.

    So, my idea is starting an avantgarde group/movement where we make art with artistic DIY tools and document the process in the art itself so that it doesn't hide its structure but shows how it was made.

    Attached is the first poem I made specifically with this project in mind. But of course, not everything we produce as a group needs to resemble these little examples I came up with. The main thing is to try to break the expectations of art (if such a thing is possible anymore) and also to be an anarchist.

    If any of this inspires you, hit me up. Perhaps we can start the group together.

     

    So, I've been toying with this idea of applying the anarchist concept of means ends unity to art (to be honest, mainly as a theoretical justification for doing what I wanted to do anyway). So, if you want to do art, and especially anarchist art, shouldn't your tools also be artistic and preferably anarchist?

    I'll give an example. Poetry is art. Tools of poetry include things like language and font. Constructed languages can be seen as art projects, and they can implement and emphasize the values of anarchism. Fonts are also art projects and they can for example be inspired by anarchism and be freely distributed etc.

    Other examples could include making specific image manipulation programs and algorithms and creating new image formats for visual arts, making esoteric programming languages for programs etc.

    So, my idea is starting an avantgarde group/movement where we make art with artistic DIY tools and document the process in the art itself so that it doesn't hide its structure but shows how it was made.

    Attached is the first poem I made specifically with this project in mind. But of course, not everything we produce as a group needs to resemble these little examples I came up with. The main thing is to try to break the expectations of art (if such a thing is possible anymore) and also to be an anarchist.

    If any of this inspires you, hit me up. Perhaps we can start the group together.

    [–] 79 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    When I read the title, I thought "Surely this Larry cannot be more cited than the famous F. D. C. Willard". But then I read the article and it turns out that's very specifically the record Larry broke.

  • source
  •  

    This network shows the frequency each pair of characters interacts in The Tortoise Webcomic strips from 1 to 66. Thicker line means more interactions.

    The Tortoise Webcomic can be found at https://thetortoisewebcomic.net/ and in Lemmy at !thetortoisewebcomic@lemmy.world.

    EDIT: Changed the picture, as there was a mistake in the data.

     

    Golem: A Self-Made Person! is a traditional roguelike with a twist. In it, you slay enemies and incorporate their parts to your own body.

    Golem is made with Python, using pygame and Pygcurse. I'm not following any tutorial or using any premade roguelike library, so it's mostly made from scratch.

    Try the alpha version now.

    view more: next ›