I'm simmering some chicken bones right now and google says a simmer temp is between 180-205. My instant-read thermometer is registering 203 but there is zero bubbling, is my thermometer off or is this normal?

all 21 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 10 points 10 months ago (1 child)

Simmer is just below bubbles I was taught! I made chicken stock from bones, used my thermometer that was calibrated so I know was working, also got around 204 and the surface just sort of glistens. No bubbles on the surface though!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    It's pretty normal. If it's simmering there shouldn't be bubbles breaking the surface. There's no reason to think your thermometer is wrong though.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    So... 203 °F = 96 °C...

    That's right on the margin where bubbles are really inevitable. It you are heating the water in a very homogeneous way, and has a lid or some salt dissolved, it's possible you don't see any bubble. It's not common, but hey, everybody sees a few uncommon things in their life.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Lid on and some salt in it. So no bubbles is considered normal for a simmer still?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 child)

    Simmering without bubbles means one of these four:

    • You're measuring in Kelvin
    • No water and only grease
    • Temperature is lower than what you're actually measuring
    • Ambient pressure is too high. (You're not in a diving bell, are you?)

    Your temperature measurement is probably off. Either that, or the water evaporated long ago and you're now only heating the grease.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

    My immediate guess is that the measurement is off (measuring pot temp instead of water temp, perhaps) or you're at a really low elevation/there's weirdly high air pressure? The former is far more likely than the latter, usually people only experience water boiling sooner than expected due to high elevation. It should absolutely be simmering at 203

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (8 children)

    I'd just raise the temp slowly until it starts boiling. The only reason I can think it wouldn't be simmering at that temp is that the water has been boiled off, but that's almost certainly not the case here.

    But I've never made stock before.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 10 months ago (7 children)

    The problem with raising the temp is that I have an induction stove. It's on the lowest setting now (L) and when I bump it up to the next setting (2) it is a full rolling boil even if I adjust the lid. There doesn't seem to be any configuration to keep small consistent bubbles like the simmer setting on my old electric stove had.

    I've measured the temp with my instant read as well as my leave in thermometer now and they do both say 203 but the zero bubbles is throwing me off.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    I found with induction on low it would sit for some length of time then for a few seconds boil, then sit. Repeat. Didn't seem to be a low power, it just made the period between energizing longer. Newer induction stoves are supposed to be better though. Have you tried a different sized pot to see if the change in thermal mass helps

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 10 months ago

    It's an ikea stove that came with the place so I'm not expecting the best quality or accuracy I guess. The broth is done and it's late so I'll have to give my smaller pot a try tomorrow. I should probably look into a better single burner induction plate that adjusts by the exact temperature in the future though.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 1 point 10 months ago (4 children)

    Tried a smaller pot today and the temp was reading 200, completely still surface

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (3 children)

    It would be a good test to boil plain water and see if your thermometer reads 212°F

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 10 months ago* (2 children)

    Just measured a rolling boil at 212.9 so the thermometer ain't lying I guess

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    So should be good then, technically a boil from water to steam is at that exact temperature , so less than that shouldnt be boiling. Maybe inductions have gotten that good where it doesn't raise into the boil and drop back out?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment