top 94 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 153 points 10 months ago (2 children)
  • [+] 58 points 10 months ago (10 children)
  • [–] 26 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    Huggies diapers fucking say “up to 100% leakproof” on the box.

    I just want to see a picture of the face of the person that thought that was reasonable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    It's impossible for an ISP to guarantee speeds though, because it's not just their connection that's being used.

    Do they use this to weasel out of reasonable expectations of connection quality? Yes, absolutely. But they also can't do anything about the speed of the server you're downloading from.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 115 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (11 children)
    • "Up to..." when used to describe things like internet speeds
    • "Wholesome" when used to describe food. Not really a lie, per se, but "wholesome" has absolutely no meaning when it comes to nutrition and just sounds good
    • "Zero calories" or 0 grams of [blank] in the nutrition information. The regulations let them round down if it's less than 1 gram standard unit of measurement for that item (edited from grams).
    • Any time you see "free" there's always at least an implied asterisk
  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    "Up to" in terms of anything. Up to inherently also contains zero.

    In regards to free, I've found that a general rule of thumb is that the larger, the bolder, the more differently colored, the more drop shadows added, the shinier, or the more 3D looking the word "free" is, the less free it will actually turn out to be.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago*

    "Up to" in terms of anything. Up to inherently also contains zero.

    I feel exactly the same way about “a fraction of” especially when it’s “a fraction of the price”, because 99/100 is a fraction, as is 100/100.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    The "zero calories" is a US thing, in the EU manufacturers are required to show nutrition per 100g. They can add percentages and serving sizes if they want, but per 100g or 100ml is required, so you can calculate your own serving sizes easily.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 10 months ago (3 children)
    • "Zero calories" or 0 grams of [blank] in the nutrition information. The regulations let them round down if it's less than 1 gram.

    For example, take a look at the "Serving size" of some cooking spray. 1/3 of a second of spray means 0.25g... So everything is zeroed out in the Nutrition facts.

    Tap for image

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    I made some chili verde chicken, just chicken and sauce in the slow cooker and served over rice. When I tried it, it was super salty. So I go check the bottle, 85mg sodium per serving. But a 350ml bottle had over 50 servings!

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago
    • "Zero calories" or 0 grams of [blank] in the nutrition information. The regulations let them round down if it's less than 1 gram standard unit of measurement for that item (edited from grams).

    A particularly egregious example is TicTacs, which are labeled as having 0 calories despite being almost pure sugar. The practice is also very common with alternative sweeteners, which have fewer calories than regular sugar but far from 0.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago

    I think "natural" was determined in court to hold jo required quality, or be free from artificial, man-made or modified elements. So wholly opposite the standard meaning of the word.

    They always come for language first.

    "Because while the truncheon may be used in lieu of conversation, words will always retain their power. Words offer the means to meaning, and for those who will listen, the enunciation of truth."

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 54 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    I signed up for the "ad free experience" on Amazon.

    Picked a movie, popup says "this feature is not available ad free". Cancelled

    How is this legal? Oh yeah, Bezos was on the stage clapping with the other robber barons.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    I gave up sailing the high seas during the golden age of streaming. Unfortunately it has already come to an end with the majority of streaming services including ads for their highest tier.

    I have wasted so much of my life on watching commercials, I refuse to waste anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago

    I have wasted so much of my life on watching commercials, I refuse to waste anymore.

    This, 100% this.

    Every streaming I have I pay the few extra bucks for ad free. Keep that fucking garbage out of my house.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 48 points 10 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 42 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    No artificial flavors

    "Natural" and "artificial" flavors are determined by how they're made/obtained, not by what the ingredient itself is. You can have the same ingredient labeled as either artificial or natural.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    Like "Natural strawberry flavor". Made by cooking wood shavings in alcohol. No strawberry was harmed in the process.

    Or like Sebastian Lege did it in one of his shows: He mixed a number of acids to make "Banana Flavor". Or when he talked about "natural smoke flavor", which is a byproduct of producing charcoal, and the company he visited claimed they produce several thousand tons a year...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 42 points 10 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 37 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    "24 hour odor protection" in deodorants.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 10 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 0 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    By applying a chemical precipitant that clogs sweat pores and backs up sweat fluids under the skin.

    Just bathe.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago*

    Just bathe.

    Spoken like someone who lives in a cold dry climate. I could bake cookies inside of my car in the summertime, and it is regularly well above the safe wet bulb temperature for human tolerances, even in the shade. You walk outside, and it feels like you’re breathing hot swamp-flavored fog. Bathing alone isn’t enough in those circumstances, because you’ll be a sweaty mess by the time you get to work anyways. Bathing is important, but you also need something to stop the sweat from immediately making you stink again.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 37 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (12 children)

    "No preservatives" - Sugar is a preservative. Salt is a preservative. Vinegar is a preservative. Lemon juice is a preservative.

    "Sugar-free" - but they add alternative sweeteners that have a range of other health issues associated with them.

    "Cholesterol-free" - I once saw this on a juice container and had a laugh.

    What people don't realise is that with food formulation, what you take out, you have to put something back in to replace it. A low/no sugar product will likely be higher in something else like fat to make it a palatable product.. So labels make claims on some things, but will purposely not mention the others.

    Edit: Yay! 100th comment!

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (6 children)

    Cholesterol-free is such a bullshit label anyway because dietary cholesterol doesn't do anything special to your own cholesterol. You are not a chicken and the egg yolk will not go directly to your bloodstream. Your blood has human cholesterol that you made yourself from the rest of the sugars and fats you ate, digested, converted, stored, and reeconverted.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (5 children)

    Let me introduce you to "Gluten Free". On a sausage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (4 children)

    I give "gluten free" a pass because it's not always obvious. Some people do have very severe reactions and some products do, unsuspectingly, contain gluten in the form of filler content or for some other mechanical use. Sausage is specifically known to use wheat product as filler and binder. Same for deli meats and veggie burgers. Some places will even throw breadcrumbs into their ground beef for burgers to fake it's tenderness, so it crumbles like a meatloaf would.

    Then there's seasonings. Potato chips are made from potatoes, right? But not all chips are potato chips. You'd hope a gluten-issue person would be able to identify pita chips or bagged crackers from the chips selection would have gluten, but it turns out, despite being a corn chip, Dorito dust can affect gluten sensitivities. Soy sauce and malt vinegar are issues, and seasoning mixes use flour to help distribution

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago

    Oh, and processing aids. That's another kettle of fish. Same with things that are added and then taken out, or vice versa, as long as they are the same amounts, they don't have to be on the label unless it's an allergen. (Australia)

    I'm always wary of places that cook or bake their own food, especially home businesses. They don't have the money to pay an accredited food lab to do their labels and testing for them. I've done my share of food label auditing, and I've seen some pretty shocking things.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 10 months ago (2 children)

    Sausage is specifically known to use wheat product as filler and binder.

    That is actually illegal in my country.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    "Nitrate free! *except for that found naturally in the shitload of powdered celery we put in there"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago* (1 child)

    "Sugar free" is such a red flag, you know they are going to go crazy with the artificial crap. I try to eat less sugar but the same goes for alternative sweeteners, plus I can't stand the taste of them. I look for "Sugar free" so I know not to buy it, that shit's going to be disgusting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago*

    most of the brand names one uses aspartame. some sugar gree gum, mints use omstly xylitol. some non sugar sweeteners actually contain sugar in it, they try to be deceptive by labeling it dextrose, or maltadextrin.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 36 points 10 months ago (10 children)

    Indestructible or tough dog toys. My boy will have that in pieces, 15 minutes or less guaranteed

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

    Get him a stick

    When he break it. He now have 2 stick

    When he have too many stick.

    Go get new stick. It free.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago

    My fucking big goofy dumball of a dog will continuously get sticks stuck in his mouth from trying to chew of them vertical instead of horizontal and its bad. He'll walk up all happy and just drip blood on my lap with his mouth stuck open. One time we came inside and didn't realize until like 30 minutes later that he had a big twig stuck in there, he was happy as can be .

    I love that dog and he loves sticks

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago

    I was in a PetsMart and I swear they had regular ass sticks that they found outside with $5 price tags on them. You could literally walk 10 steps out of their front doors and find the same thing for free.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    Indestructible toys are a catch 22, anyways. I found a couple of toys my old bud couldn’t destroy but he got bored of them very quickly. All of the satisfaction comes from the destruction.

    We just started getting him soccer balls from 5 Below. Cheap enough and big enough to last a little longer.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Only two things ever last in my house. Beef femors and nylahide chewable. Everything has a lifespan of minutes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 70 points 10 months ago (12 children)

    Stainless steel. Because the common understanding of stainless is not what the stainless in stainless steel means.

    Organic foods. Obviously this varies by location, but there are no universally standardized and enforced definitions of what it means to be organic that it comes close to being meaningless. You'd be surprised at what "organic" growers can get away with.

    Genuine leather. It's so misleading it's pretty easy to argue that it's essentially a lie.

    20% off. When it's the same cost as it was last month, you just upped the price, then put it on sale, so that in the end it evens out.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 10 months ago

    Part of the problem with stainless steel is that it's not a singular material. It's an entire galaxy of alloys with a huge range of properties, and some are more corrosion resistant than others. It is certainly possible to concoct some alloy that is for all intents and purposes absolutely rustproof but it's unlikely to have the other mechanical properties you need for whatever it is you're doing.

    If you're looking at any object (probably a knife, or maybe a sink or faucet fixture) that simply declares itself "stainless steel" but the manufacturer refuses to admit which alloy even if you press them in a vise, that does indeed usually mean you're looking at some junk. Low chromium and low nickel stainless alloys are the least corrosion resistant but all other things being equal are also typically the easiest to cut, machine, stamp, or otherwise work into shape.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    From Wikipedia:

    Organic agricultural methods are internationally regulated and legally enforced by transnational organizations such as the European Union and also by individual nations, based in large part on the standards set by the International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM),[20] an international umbrella organization for organic farming organizations established in 1972, with regional branches such as IFOAM Organics Europe[21] and IFOAM Asia.[22]

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago (5 children)

    Genuine leather.

    Is this not as opposed to fake leather (plastic)? They could just say that it is leather or real leather, but that does not sound as fancy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    It's actually a technical term disguised as common language.

    Most people think genuine means "as real as you can get". Which is true in everyday language.

    But when it comes to leather, "Genuine" is a quality grade that means "The lowest quality of leather that technically includes actual animal hide." Usually it's bits and pieces glued together.

    Consider it the hot dog of leather.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    I am pretty sure that "bits and pieces glued together" is the grade directly below it known as "bonded leather". I think "genuine leather" is the first grade that is real leather. It just isn't actually very good leather.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Calorie free. Fat free. Sodium free, etc.

    Just means that it has less than a specific threshold of the item per serving. And their servings are often arbitrarily small enough in order to conveniently miss that threshold

    I'm looking at you, Tic Tacs

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 28 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    I have been conditioned to think of "Free & Clear" as having no coloring or nasty scents added and then I come across this and was duped

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago

    This is such bullshit manipulative marketing, similar to when companies will put out an ad saying something like "ONLY $1.99/MONTH" in large, bold letters and then below it have tiny fine print saying "for the first month, then $420.69/month".

    "Free of dyes. Soft pear scent.". Boom. Done. Not only is it short, but it's clear and accurate. Almost nobody cares if it's "clear" as long as it's dye-free.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago

    Flavored dish soap is kinda wild in general. Yes, I want the things I eat and drink off of to all taste vaguely of chemical lemons.

    The default should be plain soaps and plain dish detergent. Some are so potent that the scent sticks to the dishes even after washing, and unfortunately, the food too. Especially that dawn spray soap.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 28 points 10 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 5 points 10 months ago

    I can't see this product without thinking of astronaut Chris Hadfield. He tells a story of going blind in space, because they apply a surfactant to the inside of the EVA helmet as an anti-fog coating, it's basically a mix of oil and soap. And a drop of it got in his eye, while in a spacewalk, it stung and his eye slammed shut and began to tear up, and because zero g, tears don't fall, so it just pooled in his eye socket until there was enough tears for it to spill over the bridge of his nose into the other eye.

    "Now we use Johnson's No More Tears, Which is what we should have been using from the beginning."

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 26 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    "Our roll of toilet paper is equivalent to 234 rolls of our competitor's toilet paper!!!1"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 25 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    "Waterproof" phones

    *not covered by warranty

    so it's a lie

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    We had a huge push here about waterproof vs waterresistant. "waterproof" means you can drop it into like, 12 ft of water for some crazy amount of time and it'll be fine. Water Resistant is a much more flexible term like "If you use it outdoors and a drop of water gets on it you should be fine. Of course, no average consumer knows the difference and so they assume water resistant means water proof.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›