TL;DW: Fast charging over 2 years only degraded the battery an extra 0.5%, even on extremely fast charging Android phones using 120W.

And with that, hopefully we can put this argument to rest.

top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 147 points 1 year ago (4 children)

"And with that, hopefully we can put this argument to rest."

That's not how the internet works, but nice try though ;-)

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    You fool! You fell into the classic blunder! All this time it was I, Dio!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    You guys joke and all, but fast charge induces bigger heat and then translates in more harm for the batteries (which will affect more in hot places).

    If we want to close this discussion forever I think all the anxiety that comes from this subject at all is due to the fact we can't easily replace the batteries, if we could (with the normal-ish battery sizes we have today), I don't think this test would be even worth doing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    While that seems obvious, I’ll disagree

    • phones have a charging curve that takes into account heat, battery level and probably more factors specific to battery health. Most of the additional charging speed is likely minimal effect
    • You can have a battery replaced on even the latest iPhone for $99 or less, and I expect most phones to be cheaper. Yeah it’s not really diy nor replacement cost only, but it’s just not that bad relative to the cost of the device. Sure I’d rather spend $20 and replace my own battery, but if I’m spending $1,000 on a new phone, then $99 every 3-4 years for batteries is just not that bad
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 90 points 1 year ago (28 children)

    However the Battery Saver mode on Androids that only charges the battery up to 80% DOES extend battery life. Substantial evidence shows that a high State of Charge accelerates degradation through: solid electrolyte interphase growth, loss of lithium inventory, and loss of active materials. (See: mdpi.com)

  • source
  • hideshow 28 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago (21 children)

    Here’s a fun fact: phone manufacturers know this. So what they call “100%” is not actually 100%. Your phone will not charge your battery to full. Battery charging is already designed around this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Got proof? I've not cracked open a phone for a while to see if the component labelling matches the interface, let alone tested capacity of an extracted battery directly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    He's not talking about 80/20 limits. he's talking about material breakdown at extremes. Not all manufacturers spec in 80/20 limits. AFAIK, only Samsung actually lets you stop it completely at 80, the rest just try to let it sit no higher than 80 all night.

    If they were saccrificing 40% of runtime to keep you from having to replace your battery, that would 100% be in the sales pitch.

    And honestly, that article isn't a great source of truth. A number of the statements in there are inaccurate or, at the very least, misleading.

    Charging beyond 100% or below 0% is mostly BS. The proper max voltage of the battery is a physics thing, they are in equilibrium at 4.7 / cell. Picking at a low power limit is up to the manufacturer and their choice in power distribution circuitry. He asked the chemist if you could overcharge or overdischarge a battery and mistook that as an answer that it was feasible to overcharge/overdischarge them.

    "Leaving a charger plugged in at the wall and turned on wastes energy False (well, maybe a tiny bit)" This is still true for many chargers, and calling it out as a little bit in his own arbitrary numbers is disingenuous.

    "Batteries perform worse when they’re cold False (mostly)"

    Rest assured, your C rating is wildly affected by temperature; he's trying to again call it out as slight, which is making his own narrative.

    "Powering off a device occasionally helps preserve battery life False"

    The whole time your phone is on, you are charging or discharging. Those cycles wear on the battery any time you shut your phone off, you are in the least damaging mode for your battery, especially if it's around 50% or so.

    "Using an unofficial charger damages your phone True"

    100% BS, using a crappy charger might damage your phone. Buying a quality 3rd party chager is no problem at all.

    The author doesn't appear to have a strong electronics background and he didn't ask the right questions or fully understand the importat parts of the answers

    "And if too much current is delivered to a battery, that could mean ripping out too many of those lithium ions and leading to the same kind of degradation you read about earlier. That’s not to say that all off-brand chargers will be this bad, Griffith notes, but you’re still probably better off sticking with an official model." is not the same as "Using an unofficial charger damages your phone"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Article rests on one expert. That assistant professor's publication list doesn't seem to contain evidence about it, plus the quotes in the article don't directly say it happens.

    Maybe it does, but that article only seems to be guessing based on (admittedly reasonable) theory.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (14 children)

    That depends on the manufacturer, some do, some don't. My phone has a setting to control the max charge, so I set it to 80% when I got it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    Yes, but that 100% is not really that. It has been programmed to display that percentage, when i reality its 80%.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    No, I'm saying that not all manufacturers have that limit, and it's a relatively new setting (last few years). If you have an older phone or something not from the top few manufacturers, it might not have that feature.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    This is like spinal tap. Yeah but my phone charges to 110%. I don't think you understood what they're trying to say. Changing what 100% means isn't a setting or "relatively new"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    I'm saying when your phone charges to 100%, some manufacturers take that to mean 80% of capacity, whereas others actually charge the battery to 100% of capacity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Exactly, which is neither a user setting or relatively new. Battery manufacturers have always had to decide what voltage is what state of charge (percent).

    The user setting where you limit it to 80% is on top of what the previous commenter was describing

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (7 children)

    Sure, if the manufacturer sets it to not charge to the max. I'm saying some manufactured charge to the max by default, hence why that setting is useful.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (6 children)

    I think you're leaning too much into the false assumption that "the max" is some final and definite thing.

    Batteries aren't charged from "empty" to "max", there is no "max". They're charged from one voltage level to another which isn't in a percentage value. How do you think your phone knows what percentage a battery is at?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (5 children)

    "The max" is the highest voltage the battery can safely store with reasonable losses, and "empty" is the lowest voltage the battery can safely charge from. Or something like that, I'm not a battery engineer. There's surely a bit of buffer here since users will use it outside of ideal circumstances (ambient temperature, heat dissipation, etc).

    Regardless, those numbers come from the battery manufacturer. I'm guessing phone manufacturers add some extra buffer given the properties of the phone (heat generated by electronics, heat dissipation of the case, etc).

    None of that has anything to do with what I'm talking about.

    The 20-80% range is on top of that and is based on efficiencies in battery tech. That's the sweet spot of battery longevity, and some phone manufacturers limit charging to the top end and most (all?) warn when you hit the lower bound. But not all manufacturers report 100% when it hits that upper bound of that range. Many do, but not all. Some report 80% and let you bypass it, and some don't cap that upper bound.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (4 children)

    Your first paragraph pretty much agrees with the grandparent of this whole thread. What constitutes "max" is something that the battery manufacturer and the phone manufacturer come up with.

    You said "some do this some don't". It doesn't make any sense at all. All manufacturers have to decide what 100% means. There is no some do some don't.

    I'm not a battery engineer

    Obviously not. Might as well stop at that then

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    The OP said "all phone ma manufacturers stop charging at 80%." That means phone manufacturers have a definition for 80% and 100%, and they use 80% universally while showing 100%. The first part is true, the second part isn't. Some manufacturers show 100% when it's actually their definition of 100%, meaning charging to 80% manually on those phones has value in prolonging your battery, whereas charging to 80% manually on the phones that cap at 80% doesn't have value.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Lol um no they didn't.

    So what they call “100%” is not actually 100%. Your phone will not charge your battery to full.

    Someone else mentioned "80%" when you didnt understand the first comment, but they didn't say "all manufacturers stop at 80%" either.

    You have got to be trolling at this point to be this obtuse

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Original comment:

    Here’s a fun fact: phone manufacturers know this. So what they call “100%” is not actually 100%.

    My response, which was a small clarification:

    That depends on the manufacturer, some do, some don’t. My phone has a setting to control the max charge, so I set it to 80% when I got it.

    And the follow up from a different user:

    Yes, but that 100% is not really that. It has been programmed to display that percentage, when i reality its 80%.

    And my response:

    No, I’m saying that not all manufacturers have that limit, and it’s a relatively new setting (last few years). If you have an older phone or something not from the top few manufacturers, it might not have that feature.

    Then our conversation started. That's the context. Here's your first comment:

    Exactly, which is neither a user setting or relatively new. Battery manufacturers have always had to decide what voltage is what state of charge (percent).

    The user setting where you limit it to 80% is on top of what the previous commenter was describing

    And then my response:

    Sure, if the manufacturer sets it to not charge to the max. I’m saying some manufactured charge to the max by default, hence why that setting is useful.

    My point is and has always been that this isn't universal, so don't just assume that your phone stops charging at 80% if battery longevity is important to you. Check if your phone does it so you can know.

    If anyone is trolling here, it's you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    No, they're saying that some hardware manufacturers report 80% as 100% (as you noted) while others do not. Just like some manufacturers report 5% as 5% while others report 10% as 5% with the realization that most people misjudge when they'll be able to charge.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I always find the same study referenced, which was good science but also almost 30 years old. I wonder if this is still true for modern batteries?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but as far as I know there haven't been significant changes in Li-Ion and LiPo batteries aside from extra density - which would only increase the effect. But it seems like solid-state batteries are starting to hit the real world now

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I bet thats wrong, but I know ….

    There've been usage changes

    • iPhone has “Optimized Charging” where it predicts usage and tries to keep about 80% charge until it expects you to use it
    • iPhone has “Adaptive Performance “. Maybe not charging but tries to gradually ramp to “low power mode” to be gentler on the battery
    • all phones likely have refined charging curves to match battery technology
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    It is, but phone manufacturers know this and already programmed their charging circuits to take it into account.

    But if you're using 18650 cells or some other lithium based battery for other purposes (vapes for example), it's something to keep in mind.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 40 points 1 year ago (21 children)

    I hadn't watched the video yet, but my phone's going the opposite way. It run slow charge overnight when it feels like it's going to be enough for it to be fully charged the next morning.

    We really should let electronics and tight software take care of these little things.

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    My phone tells me every night that it's slow charging and it will be full by [the time I have my alarm set for].

    Pixel 8 Pro.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    iPhones do this as well, I assume both will also do it without the alarm as mine has simply learned what time I take it off the charger normally.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Its kinda funny as I remember when people wanted a phone that could last all day because there was plenty of time to charge on the nightstand. Feels like batteries got way better and people got lazy about plugging them in.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    people got lazy about plugging them in

    always have been, here. the old cdma flip phone went about a month between charges, even when it was 5+ years old. the new volte one sucks. with a higher power draw and the shitty 4g signal here, i have to plug it in every few days. the only 'plus' is that i always know where a charger cable is now, because it's usb-c and i use that for other things, too.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    We just spend more and more time on our phones. I still charge every night. Each new phone I’ve gotten has had more battery life than the last but I also use the phone constantly, so it’s no more likely to last the day.

    This is somewhat masked because my car has fast wireless charging. I just put my phone down and when I get somewhere my battery is topped off

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (13 children)

    If you'd watch the video you may realize it's not needed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    The point is that I never had to care about battery management for years. I just leave the phone doing its thing. Not that it's useful or not useful to do so.

    The whole point is that I leave that in the hand of people that know.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    Well not charging to 100% all the time will improve your battery life, and if you keep your devices a long time and have a usage pattern that allows charging it less like I do (I leave mine on a wireless charge pad at work), then it makes sense to make some adjustments to that particular setting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Nah, I can't be bothered by that. And the only device's battery I really had issues with was a seven years old laptop, years ago. BMS and software will almost always know better than the user these days.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Max charge level is not something the BMS can decide for you because it's a trade off between battery health and daily charge level. That's why they ask you to choose.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Who's doing the asking there? Neither my laptop nor my phones asked anything.

    According to the settings on my current phone, the automatic setting will decide by itself to limit the maximum charge overnight, then plan to go full charge around the time my alarm should fire.

    But, again, that's the kind of micromanagement that would yield a tiny fraction of "maybe improvement" over the lifetime of the damn thing. I'd rather have a device works all the time for 6 years than have a device that's sometime undercharged for 6.1 years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    No need to wait aeons for someone who enjoys the sound of their own voice to slowly and laboriously explain it like astronomy to a dog. Someone wrote 15 words and I read it in about a half-second.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I'm not saying your opinion is wrong or that you have to watch the video or anything like that, but videos like this are made so that you can see the testing procedure and judge it's validity without just having to assume they did their job right. I wouldn't trust someone just saying "yup, tried it out, doesn't really matter 👍🏽"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 170 points 1 year ago (16 children)

    It's as if engineers knew what they're doing.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 134 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Granted, with all the planned obsolescence happening, you could also argue that engineers "knew" what they were doing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Planned obsolescence happens but it's not as common as most people think it is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    And probably not as intentional as most people think it is vs just laziness and maybe a lack of planning.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    So not planned obsolescence, then?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    Well, if they realize the problem and do nothing to fix it and don’t advertise this problem, it ends up being a less worse type of planned obsolescence, but it’s still planned obsolescence imo

    More like unplanned obsolescence but it’s a convenient problem so we plan on it happening

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (2 children)

    It’s always bulbs or Apple. Bulbs industry switched into LED like 15 years ago, which has 20x lifespan than “durable” filaments; and iPhones average life is 6 years whereas competitors usually went into bin in 3 years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    With iPhones i think it's less about durability (and especially in the software department they were always great in terms of longevity), but more about repairability in case something does happen.

    As far as lightbulbs go the issue with potential planned obsolescence doesn't go way just because of the swap to LEDs. First there are a type of bulb even today that use some form of filament and second the part that gets damaged is usually some kind of capacitor or other electronic part that gets run with too much voltage and too hot. Don't have time to watch it again, but i remember finding this video from a few years ago interesting.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    The planned obsolescence is most likely a deliberate trade off rather than actual planned obsolescence.

    If fast charging did do significant damage to battery life and this was known at the time of implementation, the decision would have been "users want fast charging phones" Vs "users want devices that last a long time".
    In this instance, the convenience of fast charging absolutely would have won.

    "Users want a clear and easy to use device" Vs "users want a robust device". Which is why we all have glass screens, and the glass technology had to catch up to further expectations.

    "Users want easy wireless connectivity" Vs "users want fast and reliable network speeds". WiFi wins, and has to catch up to further expectations.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 41 points 1 year ago*

    If engineers were the ones in control that would mean something.

    As I see it, phone manufacturers have zero reasons to keep the battery degradation low, but many reasons to push advertised capacity and charging speed. If you were cynical, you could also assume that they're trying to make sure the battery doesn't last too long because they want to keep selling new phones.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago

    I think we all know that if an engineer went to upper management and said “I can charge these batteries faster, but it degrades the battery life by 20% over a year.” they would have said “Do it! We won’t mention that last part.”

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    You say that like batteries don't need replaced every few years or that they didn't design the Samsung Note 8 phone that kept catching on fire.

    Engineers get told to make the phone charge as quickly as possible, while still lasting 2 years. After that, the company with those engineers pretty much wants the battery to fail, so they can sell a new device.

    The one thing I wanted to see from that video, was also just testing the batteries until they went below like 75% capacity. The initial degradation may start off similar for capacity, but that doesn't mean it will stay that way.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 83 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Betteridge's law of headlines: "Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no."

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Maybe it can be modified to something like:

    "Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by yes or no, whichever seems the most obvious."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • Nope:

    Betteridge's law of headlines is an adage that states: "Any headline that ends in a question mark can be answered by the word no." It is based on the assumption that if the publishers were confident that the answer was yes, they would have presented it as an assertion; by presenting it as a question, they are not accountable for whether it is correct or not.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago*

    That’s no longer true. As reporting quality continues to decline and headlines focus more and more on outrage clicks straying further and further from the content, all too many can now be answered with ”n/a”

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Ok, before i watch the video, no damage is not what great scott found from his testings.. ( https://youtu.be/iMn2yVoEqPs ).

    so i have no idea what to believe anymore, but my (based) experience is that it does damage it. Ill have to watch later.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Yea, but that wasn't a great rest. I love Great Scott, but a lot of comments fairly call out his conclusion.

    Most (all?)phones don't charge at full speed to 100% charge, they fast charge when the battery is almoast empty, and charge slower the more full it gets.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    Right, so basically he removed the software aspect in his tests which removes systems to protect the battery. I assume without them, it is damaging, like what great scott found.

    Ye, he should have continued his experiments then!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 75 points 1 year ago*
    [–] 24 points 1 year ago (14 children)

    I always thought that charging beyond 85% or so is what degrades batteries. The LiPos of my quadcopter actually actively reduce their charge if left sitting somewhere for a longer period of time. To prevent them from going up in flames.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The idea with fast charging is it's going to generate more heat. That extra heat is what damages the batteries life

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    It does, but the battery charge controller in your phone already does that. What it shows you as 0-100 is 20-80 of the actual battery. Others may or may not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    What you call 0% or 100% on a battery is an arbitrary number anyway. Absolutely never do this for safety reasons, but back when I worked for a battery lab I did experiments where I discharged cells to below 0V.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    In a previous job I once evaluated some returned product that wasn't having the best battery life or wasn't working right. It was specialized expensive equipment that used regular alkaline batteries.

    TL;DR: ordinary batteries can have negative voltage if you don't give a fuck and just mix your old and new ones in a drawer before you put them into your high-cost life-saving equipment.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Do you have more info on that?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    Lithium-* batteries don't actually have any specific useful numbers. It's something like this (the actual numbers are pulled out of my ass and depends on battery time and test parameters and even then I'm simplifying):

    • At 0 volts, the battery is dead.

    • At 1 volts, the battery is practically dead.

    • Discharging to 2 volts kills it after around 100 times.

    • Discharging to 3 volts kills it after around 10 000 times

    • Discharging to 3.5 volts kills it after 100 000 times

    • Charging to 4 volts kills it after 100 000 times

    • Charging to 4.2 volts kills it after 10 000 times

    • Charging to 4.3 volt kills it after 1000 times

    • Charging to 4.4 volts kills it after 100 times

    • Charging to 4.5 has s significant chance of it catching fire

    Now choose how many charge cycles you want it to survive, and you know which voltage to consider 0% and which to consider 100%. The bigger difference, the bigger capacity with the same battery.

    This is why a phone with 0% battery can tell you that it's out of battery.

    You can also adjust what "killed" means. Is it when battery capacity is reduced to 80%? 50%?

    I have to repeat - the numbers are not accurate, and this is strongly simplified.

    It's just an illustration of what 0% and 100% means it's just where you are on the useful range, according to the manufacturers definition of useful.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    The battery has a charge curve. What does the most wear or damage to the battery is the ends of the curve - either deep discharging the battery or charging it up fully to the point where it cannot take any more charge. It's up to the manufacturer where they want to put 0% and 100% on the curve - to protect and extend the life of the battery most manufacturers don't put 0% and 100% at the extreme ends of the curve.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    A cell's voltage will change with how much energy it stores, but if you keep applying current to force more charge to move you can cause voltages to be quite far outside of the proper range. However you don't want to do this as at minimum you are damaging the materials in the cell, or worse, cause a significant safety hazard where the cell could catch on fire.

    You can look at the Discharge Curve of a cell which compares voltage vs capacity, as a rule of thumb, essentially the steeper the curve changes, the more damage you are doing to the cell by operating in the range.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (3 children)

    Best source I can find: https://eugen-barilyuk.medium.com/how-i-realized-android-battery-percentage-wasnt-serious-enough-0310e484d874

    3.7v is 0%, 4.2v is 100%. But a lithium battery can go higher and lower, it's just that doing that can harm the battery, perhaps spectacularly. OEMs just narrow the voltage range to extend life. When you set a charge limit, it narrows that range further.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You'll find that based on 3.7 - 4.2 that most li-ion batteries are indeed charged from 0-100 and not 20-80 as you previously claimed. Manufacturers have no reason to overprovision consumer products that are made to be replaced in 5 years or so.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    Yes, that's what I said. You could go higher and lower, and it would be reasonable to do for a short-life device, but they reduce it to extend the life. Mapping voltage to percentage is arbitrary.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Something is off with the link's measurements. 3.7V is a li-ion cell's nominal voltage, not its lower limit. Typical operating range is 3.0V - 4.2V. No battery chemistry I'm familiar with would have a lower cutoff as high as 3.7V.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago

    I’ve got some devices I’ve been fast charging for 8 years; it seems to be more of a problem as the device ages; but that’s offset by having it ready to use again quickly.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    59 comments in c/android@lemdro.id view that post