[–] 20 points 1 day ago
  • 4 nm Snapdragon® 8 Gen 3 - ARM64
  • 16GB Unified LPDDR5X RAM
  • 256GB UFS storage, microSD card slot
  • Rechargeable 21.6 Wh Li-ion battery
  • 2160 x 2160 LCD (per eye)
  • 72-144Hz refresh rate (144Hz experimental)
  • Inside-out camera based tracking
  • Headset: Wi-Fi 7, 2x2, Dual Radios
  • Wireless Adapter Included (Wi-Fi 6E)
  • Bluetooth 5.4
  • Dual speaker drivers per ear, dual microphone array
  • SteamOS 3
  • Steam Frame Controllers – full 6-DOF and gamepad controls
  • Half-Life: Alyx included

...so, how come the phone costs twice as much as the steam frame?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    Tho I do get that it doesn't get any subsidies from preinstalled bloatspyware.

    On the software side, the Signature 27 comes with Android 17 preinstalled, along with the usual Google services, Gemini, and Gemini Intelligence. Motorola says it also includes the new Rambler voice dictation feature, which Google introduced with the Pixel 11 series. It also includes “Create My Widget,” a feature that lets users create widgets to their specifications.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago

    Yeah? At this price I'll just not buy this new phone and keep my old, cheaper to produce, phone. The consumer/buyer doesn't have to care why it's expensive, they have to decide if the price is acceptable or not. Motorola could have chosen cheaper components and made a phone that's worse, but also cheaper. That would have likely have been a phone I'd buy but instead they made a flagship that costs 1900€.

    At this price It's just not worth it for me.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    How can they even justify the price? Samsung's flagship "only" costs 1750€ and even Apple is lower at 1850€, and that's assuming the 1900€ price is for the 512GB variant and not the 256GB where Samsung and Apple would be even cheaper (1550, 1600). Are they really thinking people will choose them over the most popular brands when they are more expensive and less established?

  • source
  •  

    I'm looking for experiences and opinions on kubernetes storage.

    I want to create a highly available homelab that spans 3 locations where the pods have a preferred locations but can move if necessary.

    I've looked at linstore or seaweedfs/garage with juicefs but I'm not sure how well the performance of those options is across the internet and how well they last in long term operation. Is anyone else hosting k3s across the internet in their homelab?

    Edit: fixed wording

    view more: next ›