Honestly where the fuck are the gangbangers in all this? All that talk about fuck the police and how hard they are and all and there hasnt been one incidence of ICE being rolled up on by the westside crips.

It's probably proud boys and their affiliates. Remember, they had meetings before the last Insurrection.

I used to think I liked monopoly busting

Until they busted up the state's monopoly on violence

Yes there is, I can see these guys’ eyes.

ICEis doesn't look like they would be as agile on the monkey bars. So, checkmate.

who are they

That's not true, those guys are carrying the wrong type of gun!

Because the whole second amendment thing was about carrying a gun in the hope that you get to shoot a black person, a school kid or a teacher.

Never have I hoped the L.A street gangs just take this matter into their own hands

Probably because the Democrats are so anti-gun/weapon. The target demographic probably leans anti-weapon, even if they're not necessarily Democrats. The combination keeps them more vulnerable. It's even worse when carrying weapons in these areas is outright banned: no training, no permits, only police. The safety of the group is generally prioritized over the safety of the individual. Which, like here, can be a problem.

From how they're acting, it seems only a matter of time. They seem to check all of the boxes for a lethal or deadly force in nearly every state, even the strict ones. An unidentified suspiciously dressed group aggressively surrounding you and preventing your retreat? Lethal/deadly force can often be used to defend another person. Someone else can shoot these idiots in plain clothes with no identification.

Even if "police" identify themselves late, it seems to be setting themselves up for a weak defense

Tbf, the mask is a bigger inconvenience when you're picking up veggies from the food isle than when chasing down migrants while hoping over a couple of fences. Don't your see? The aerodynamic design of the mask will...

I think they’re the same people that are locking up random immigrants

Where's the well regulated militia you Americans scream about

So, one could argue that the well regulated militia in question is constituted by the National Guard, as they nominally are the armed forces of individual States, and can be nationalized under certain circumstances.

Except for the fact that Trump just nationalized the California National Guard when he's nominally not supposed to....

They're too busy gargling republican boot to bother rising up against the tyranny they've cried about for decades.

To a unnerving amount of people's surprise, they only cared about the power of the state when they thought it was being used improperly (having a tolerant democracy), and are more than happy to see it used the way they want (hurting brown people)

Yes. Nobody wants to be first because they and the next xx% will be the sacrifice.

The thing that I don't get about those people is, what do they think the "well regulated" part means?

This has been asked many, many times. Most of them are on Drumpy's side. The same fucks on Jan6.

Those 2a chuds will never rise up against a tyrannical government.

They'd rather kneel down for a tyrannical government.

Do you actually want an answer? I think you know the details aren’t suitable for a public forum.

A lot of these areas have much more stringent gun laws. Yes, they can own the guns, but they can't carry them. Carrying/displaying will probably get them arrested and charged with a weapons felony.

I'm usually told we've moved beyond the need for people to do that. Then we should just leave the use of force to the police: The organizations that consistently seem to try to prove we can't trust them. I agree, the police should be an organization Americans can trust: How can we make them that way?

Does anyone see the irony?

• U.S. conservatives "trust" the police, but still want civilians to be armed.
• U.S. "leftists" distrust the police, but want them to be the only ones armed.

The U.S. never fixed their trust issues with police. So this seems like the logical result.

Hey dumbass, it turns out that:

1. Each state has its own laws about this. Where I live the same state constitution that ALSO specifically grants us the right to own firearms for self defense explicitly forbids belonging to any private militia.

2. My part (Democrats) is so overwhelmingly anti gun that 99% of aren’t armed to begin with. So precious militia you’re smugly pretending to ask about? Yeah you’re looking at them in the post to begin with. They’re all boot licking fascists.

Nice try though, pretending disarming Americans is the answer to anything other than more deportations, more oppression, and so on.

I’ll give you this: literally neither side gives a shit about the actual underlying problem: mental health. Over half of ALL gun deaths in the USA each year are from suicide. You don’t need an AR15 for that. Banning and removing all guns successfully won’t stop all those people wanting to be dead, but my fellow Democrats don’t care and the fascists sure don’t.

Well put, Mr. Satan

I imagine South Africa would complain. They don't want him back.

California "No Secret Police Act" introduced, would ban police from covering their faces - CBS San Francisco https://share.google/yBJZoO8cseW6R5mc9

Also: https://youtu.be/j7SOc_8IhSY

There's reporting that they're already doing this to citizens. You need to show them your papers to prove you're a citizen, but if you're not of the right skin tone they might decide they think your papers are fake and detain you.

How bout we do the same to them?

Yeah, a reference to Steven Seagal movies would have been more poignant.

good point but do you understand the premise of the meme?