[–] 3 points 1 year ago

16 is indeed Sus, but less than that is definitely in the "fuck no" category. that's why I put my arbitrary are at 16.

14 and found my edibles by climbing to the top of my closet, yhea just a talk about it.

but 6? no fucking excuse.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    there are many economical and technical issues,

    for starters, they don't care if you or your children are exposed to toxic chemicals in the drinking water.

    also, it'll cost money (an insignificant fraction of the cost of the damages) but damages are free, so they don't care.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    damn, can believe it needs to be said,

    don't give drugs to children...

    I am willing to talk about 16+

    given that chances are they'll try them anyways, and it'll be better for them to know it's safe to do them in a safe place like home, and call a trusted adult for help. better than assuming they are saints and hope they don't do it in a sketchy place when sketchy people.

    but straight up giving children drugs? fuck no

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    phones need to implement personal:

    if you are calling to make cancel change appointments press 1

    if you are calling to share updates press 2

    if you are calling about those 20$ you owe me, press 3 for venmo info

    ...

    i want it

  • source
  • view more: next ›