all 86 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 158 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Are. You. Fucking. Kidding. Me???

What the fuck America? Honestly. What the actual fuck has happened to your nation.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 54 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    we’vr had sleeper cells of nazis and bootlickers on “both” sides of the aisles for a century or so because they’re all actually aged capitalists. When capitalists feel like their quality of life and profit is threatened, by labor or technology, they will work toward two things:

    Moving the overton window in small steps as they test the waters and then implementing actual fascism in the waters where their tests succeeded.

    Notice the areas with martial law are not really big on public ownership of guns or understanding of castle doctrine? That’s on purpose.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • We never had a true democracy and that fact is coming around to bite us and everyone else in the ass again. We don't have Christian denominations anymore, we have sports teams. We don't have politics, we wage culture war. God damn bless america... I fucking hate it here

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    We clearly need help. Will it be from wherever you're from?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    What sort of help do you think any country outside of yours can provide?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    That "help" only happened because Germany started a world war

    Most countries don't just interfere with other countries' politics... although I know that's a hard concept to grasp for the USA haha

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    WW3 has already started, and if you don't believe me, I can point to the MAGA in your own country. The invasion happened online.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 240 points 1 year ago* (8 children)

    Let me skip to the future decision for you: yes 6-3

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 127 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Majority opinion written by Clarence Thomas.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 70 points 1 year ago (5 children)
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Reality really is stranger than fiction sometimes.

    Society tends to repeat on approximately 80-100 year cycles. Just long enough for the generations affected by bullshit to lose their voices and die.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Society tends to repeat on approximately 80-100 year cycles.

    American society. And it's been closely shown to hold since when America attacked Canada, of all places.

    Other countries have their own cycles. Consider the 11-year Canada goose purge cycle that affects your friends to the north. It's not spoken of but, like seal clubbing, a periodic culling is required to prevent them invading and burning the Library of Parliament and goosey sanchez-ing the last copy of the Declaration upon Dependence. It's a little backward up there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Spy magazine ran a great cartoon back in the early '90s which I can't find anywhere online. It was captioned "Clarence Thomas greets the day" and it showed him bending down on his front porch to pick up the newspaper with a negro stable boy lawn statue next to him.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 103 points 1 year ago

    Just when you think, it couldn't possibly get any more absurd.

  • source
  • [–] 73 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 67 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Wasn't this already decided when they ruled that stop-and-frisk laws were unconstitutional due to racial profiling?

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Why respect precedent when you can just make a new one and get bribed for it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    It's called a "gratuity" now instead of a bribe. I guess the SCOTUS was feeling left out watching the other two branches make money hand over fist and decided to legalize it.

    Edit: apparently the difference is getting paid after, instead of before, whatever "service" is provided.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Stare Decisis is for suckers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Blindly following precedent without reason, maybe...but applying the law without any form of consistency isn't helpful either. Rulings need to be fair, across the board. They can't wildly swing from one precedent to another, depending on the individual whims of whichever judge is currently deciding a case.

    That's exactly what's happening now, with the current Supreme Court...and look at how that's going.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    They can't wildly swing from one precedent to another, depending on the individual whims of whichever judge is currently deciding a case.

    They can and they are.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    That's why I responded the way I did to the guy that said, "Stare Decisis is for suckers".

    The current Supreme Court is not adhering to precedent. Without that adherence, no decision is final. Every established law can simply be reinterpreted again and again, without any consistency.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I wasn’t suggesting it, that phrase is an older conservative trope from legal blog from 20 years ago that is clearly motivating the current Supreme Court. (The current strict scrutiny podcast references it too in a clearly sarcastic tone as well)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 59 points 1 year ago

    We've been here before. Looking Jewish, sounding Jewish, being where Jews might live or be, doing jobs that Jews might do.

  • source
  • [–] 42 points 1 year ago

    Can I pay taxes on “apparent income”?

  • source
  • [–] 38 points 1 year ago

    Oh joy.

    This court. Deciding if cops can openly be racist.

    I wonder how they will rule. Lmao.

  • source
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Finally, ICE (and friends) can get new uniforms designed by Hugo Boss.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    "SCOUTS reconsiders lynching"

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    So, where will that leave Puerto Rican people? Puerto Rico is part of the Untied States but the people look foreign

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    Sometimes, I don't even know why the state option is popular in Puerto Rico. It definitely is; they've had two official but non-binding referendum on this in the recent past, and the statehood option was a clear winner. Won by good margins over both maintaining current status or going independent.

    Ultimately, I think it should be up to the people of PR to decide what they want to do, but geeze, this isn't a great time to join the Union.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    To be fair, they're already part of the Union whether they want to or not, it's more a matter of if they get to have political representation or not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Are you saying they are experiencing taxation without representation?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    They made a huge mistake with POTUS the first time by not sending their children to felate him when he showed up to throw paper towels after hurricane Maria.

    The only way for Puerto Rico to become a state is if they all turned Republican and white.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Come one man, you know where because it's already happening.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Puerto Rican? Mexican.

    Mediterranean? Mexican.

    Native American? Mexican.

    We have the whitest populace cause of jail.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Wow, I really don't have any confidence they will get this one right.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    How is this even a question?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    For the same reason old white men can debate their authority over woman's body. Murica.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Hey now, don't forget Clarence Thomas. He's worked very hard to be as evil as possible. Sometimes old black men can be racist in their own way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago

    Can't wait to share this with my Latino friends who voted for Trump.

  • source
  • [–] 47 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Dear Supreme Court: you don't need to. They can't.

    Dear Congress: impeach Trump. If someone blocks you, impeach them.

    Dear MAGA idiots: shut up and grow up.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago

    Yeah, feels a bit too late for that. This isn't going to stop until the non-fascist Americans drag them out into the streets and dispense justice. People are going to die and the good guys are going to need to organise a whole lot first.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago

    We know how this is going to go with the court's record lately. It is just Trump's lapdogs jumping when he tells them too.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago

    How is this even up for debate? It's like we went 100+ years in the past 🤦‍♂️

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago

    We just have to convince the conservatives that this would be a DEI program and it'll be a slam dunk case. /s

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    I wonder which way they will go...

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Guys, that is a reeaaaallly slippery slope. Don't. Just don't.

    -A concerned German-

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago*

    This is already illegal.

    Racial profiling is considered illegal in the United States as it violates the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause, which guarantees all individuals protection from discrimination based on race or ethnicity.

    Also, if there is no suspicion of a crime, it is illegal to detain someone. Otherwise that's kidnapping.

    These issues have been litigated many times.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    Supreme Court to rule on if ICE can be openly racist?

  • source
  • There really needs to be a community called "jesusfuckingchristAmerica"

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    Sweet! Dred Scott is back on the docket, baby!

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Next up....Are Asian women people? What constitutes a voting person?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    Yes, they will decide that they can.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Lol the world is fucked

  • source
  • 21 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post