top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Probably trying to distract from DOGE carving out the government.

  • source
  • [–] 152 points 1 year ago (11 children)

    Monkeys throwing shit at each other.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 87 points 1 year ago* (8 children)

    From their own social media platform. Thats the part that always gets me about their spats. They only post and read on the platform they own.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Nah, they read everything about themselves, or have someone read it to them.

    Then they go to the place where they literally control the narrative and respond.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    you know. just like jefferson and hamilton. america has always been this weird form of fascism that fetishizes libertarian ideals while having a top down authoritarian regime. trump is just a lowering of the curtain. everything can get worse faster now because there's nothing preventing them from being who they really are

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    It's absolutely wild that the US president is able to pardon convicts. Like you have a supposedly independent legislature and judiciary, and the the president can just go "nuh-uh" to anything he doesn't like

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    the power of the pardon is meant to be a check/balance. no one really planned for the american people knowingly and willingly voting for corruption

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    The way that the parties used to control nominations helped keep ideologues out, and deal makers who knew how to play along in.

    Then the tea party and money in politics went insane and now we have the dumbest Congress people and a somehow even dumber President.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    People thought the smoke filled rooms that gave us Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, and Goldwater were the most corrupt thing and what we needed was more democracy.

    And 2 generations later we got trump.

  • source
  • parent
  • Stopped clocks, etc.

    Eel on musk is completely correct.

    The fact that he’s correct on this point does not make him a good person. He’s still an absolutely magnificent shitbag.

  • source
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Two of the worst people in the world feuding is just magnificent.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 33 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    He just wants to be cool again.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    That's not going to happen, but it's really gonna be fun watching them fight more while he tries.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I don't find it fun at all. It coukd easily lead to Trump consolidating his power

    If he decides to really go after Musk ny stripping his citizenship, or taking away federal money, it'll send a strong message to the other oligarchs to fall in line

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    If he wants to do it this way he is welcome to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    As long as he doesn’t garner supporters and then flip them to some crazy shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago

    mind that he was willing to do all this together until he couldn't get enough shit from mango mussolini for his pockets companies. he can choke on a bag of dildos after he gets his nuremberg trial.

    if these people, all of them, including the Dems who capitulate, owners of the media companies that censor in their name and push their fascist agenda, all ICE employees, don't get their own nuremberg trials, and examples aren't made of them, the US might as well throw the towel and declare itself a lawless land and a failed state.

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    comeon Elmu, just put your money where the mouth is.

    Tesla shares for everyone who brings/leaks hard evidence.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Ew no money please. The only people who want Tesla shares are going to be worthless idiots.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I dunno, I'm almost out of toilet paper anyway

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 65 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    So a dementia-ridden ketamine addict is trying to talk shit to a dementia-ridden amnesia sufferer.

    Sounds exactly like republicans.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5403496-dana-white-donald-trump-ufc-fight-south-lawn/

    President Trump, who attended a UFC fight earlier this year with allies and members of his Cabinet, floated the idea of a fight on the South Lawn weeks ago as part of the nation’s 250th birthday celebration. The proposal comes as the Trump administration grows the corporate presence on White House grounds.

    Trump held an event for Tesla on the South Lawn earlier this year — when he purchased an electric vehicle alongside then-ally Elon Musk in a statement to those protesting the automaker— in addition to the first corporate-sponsored White House Easter Egg roll.

    “We’re going to be on the South Lawn, and literally, when you’re watching the fight, this will all be the White House here, and then behind me will be, you know, the Washington Monument,” White said during the news conference.

    White confirmed the fight will be pay-per-view but didn’t outline any match-ups ahead of the South Lawn show.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bread_and_circuses

    "Bread and circuses" (or "bread and games"; from Latin: panem et circenses) is a metonymic phrase referring to superficial appeasement. It is attributed to Juvenal (Satires, Satire X), a Roman poet active in the late first and early second century AD, and is used commonly in cultural, particularly political, contexts.

    In a political context, the phrase means to generate public approval, not by excellence in public service or public policy, but by diversion, distraction, or by satisfying the most immediate or base requirements of a populace,[1] by offering a palliative: for example food (bread) or entertainment (circuses). Juvenal originally used it to decry the "selfishness" of common people and their neglect of wider concerns.[2][3][4] The phrase implies a population's erosion or ignorance of civic duty as a priority.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I hate musk, think he is a nazi, and will reject the world he creates. Glad he is taking this one on though. They deserve each other.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    It's like watching two nasty creatures fight each other while you, who was going to be eaten by one of them, can get away, at least for a little bit. But if you had the ability, you stomp the fuck out of both of them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It's simply astounding the slop Americans will accept as "Journalism" nowadays.

    Though Musk slammed Trump's handling of the Epstein files, his attacks themselves were riddled with false assumptions, including conspiracy theories about the existence of an Epstein "client list," which is unsupported by evidence.

    So ABC "News" just straight up parrots the Trump administrations talking points as if they are objective facts. "Left Leaning" bias my asshole :(

    And what is the "evidence" they use to back up this supposed fact, some lawyer hasn't seen it. As we all know, absence of evidence is evidence of absence. Good Job ABC, case closed.

    Not to mention this lawyers story is full of holes.

    First of all he claims to be representing Epstein's victims, but goes on to say that

    "he is bound by attorney-client privilege and cannot ethically reveal the names of any of Epstein's alleged associates without permission from his clients."

    Exsqueeze me? Admittedly I am not a lawyer, but what exactly would be the point of 'representing' the victims if they refuse to release the names of the people who assaulted them? Isn't the point to bring these people to justice? How would it benefit the victims in any way to not release the names? The only way that would make sense is if Edwards was only there to distribute hush money payments. Can anyone explain this to me?

    Then he goes on to say

    "It's difficult to even discern, when he would send a woman to one of his friends, whether that was even a motivation. What he was not is a person on the top of a sex trafficking operation that was sending women to powerful people around the world so that he could make money. It was not a business,"

    but later in the exact same article the writer says

    "And it raises questions whether those records, if made public, could finally lead to a better understanding of how a college dropout from Coney Island managed to accumulate astounding wealth and proximity to power -- a transformation that has long defied ready explanation."

    Gee, its so weird how a guy who was a habitual child molester, who was friends with some very rich and powerful scumbags, who's partner was convicted of sex trafficking, and who was mysteriously able to accumulate "astounding wealth" is also clearly and unambiguously innocent of running a sex trafficking operation, because 'some guy said so'. If anyone read that sentence and thinks it sounds plausible please PM me, I just got some really nice bridges in famous cities and I'm willing to let them go for cheap.

    Oh and here comes my favorite part:

    Edwards describes the enigmatic Epstein as living, essentially, two separate lives: one in which he was sexually abusing women and girls "on a daily basis," and another in which he associated with politicians, royalty, and titans of business, academia, and science.

    "For the most part, those two worlds did not overlap. And where they overlapped, in the instances they overlapped, it seems to be a very small percentage," Edwards said.

    Ok? Edwards let's say that it was a 'very small percentage', WHO FUCKING CARES?! I don't care if it was one person, that person should be named and prosecuted. For Fuck Sake saying he only did 'a little bit' of pimping out underage children for the wealthy to molest as if that excuses it or diminishes it in any way makes me want to puke.

    "There were occasions where a select few of these men engaged in sexual acts with a select few of the girls that Jeffrey Epstein was exploiting or abusing -- primarily girls who were over the age of 18."

    Again, WHO THE FUCK CARES?! Why does this even need to be said? Even if we take what this clown is saying as absolute fact, that still means young women were being exploited and abused, and some % of them were underage. WHO WERE THE 'SELECT FEW' MEN? That is what we want to know, not hear excuses like "Well it was only a few men, and only some of the girls were underage". Get all the way the fuck out of here with that bullshit.

    "That conduct was coercive, it was exploitative, and it was bad. But it's a small fraction of the men he was associated with," Edwards said. "And he was abusing hundreds of women, if not a thousand. And it's a very small fraction of those women that he was sending to men.

    I'm not going to say it again. 🤮

    he said he has seen no indication that Epstein kept a list of those men, or that he made it a practice to use those instances to blackmail or extort the men

    The cameras in the bedrooms and the bathrooms were just there for the molesters safety and nothing else I'm sure.

    "So the best thing would be: Protect the victims' names, release everything else, so that the world can see what is real, versus what is total fiction, and then everybody can move on."

    Except that you and ABC have just spent an entire article regurgitating the Trump administrations excuses for not releasing them, so why in the fuck would they bother? But hey, now you can guys can pretend that you are for releasing the information even though you just gave them every excuse not to. Convenient.

    There's more I could say but I'm getting sick just thinking about this crap. The whole damn thing is disgusting.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    “Left Leaning” bias my asshole :(

    Yeah, I have to chuckle at lots of "wellaxetually" types that like to play the Enlightened Centrist (TM) that pop up nearly on any given forum to lecture the likes of me when I openly mock the notion of a "liberal media".

    When I ask just where the fuck this supposed "liberal media" is, I usually get a lot of bafflegab that leads almost nowhere. Often they point to bullshit sites like that one that do nothing to consider the broader spectrum or ideas like Chomsky's where he has pointed out that very strident arguments tend to be allowed between a very narrow and confined range.

    And so a website like Wonkette is ranked as "far left" by such types, LOL. When nothing on Wonkette comes even close to the far left, LOL. It's just that most of the media landscape is dominated by extremists like Faux, and set up as a contrast to the news outlets of megacorps and their values...which both have nearly the same exact values. The Faux wing of that "spectrum" just comes with more homophobia, transphobia, race-baiting, misogyny, etc...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Elmo always knew he was a POS. The while time.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Elon's brother was like epstein's second-best friend.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago*

    There's pictures of him with Maxwell floating around that he's been trying really hard to erase, right? It wouldn't surprise me if he's on the list himself and feeling confident that he's not going to get fucked over because he knows there's too many powerful people who have no interest in ever seeing those files released around or because he and the Elonjugend just happened to get rid of any evidence that could implicate him.

    Anyway, he's only doing this because he's mad that Trump doesn't want to play Tesla salesman anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It's hilarious how obvious their falling out was going to be 6 months ago.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    He thinks if he can help bring down Trump Tesla stock will go up. Instead he can go down with him. Elite pos scumbags.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yes it is a cover up. Trump is a pedo who’s best friend was a pedo.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago*

    And this is being told to us by a drug addled, serial conman, with an insemination, but not actually breeding kink, who lies about his prowess in video games for attention and validation, and just released an interactive AI girlfriend/boyfriend simulator...

    Who is also the richest man in the world.

    Who paid for the person he is now mud slinging at, to become President.

    ...

    We live in a fever dream, or fan fiction level attempt at a cyberpunk novel from the 80s.

    Fuck it, maybe simulation theory is correct, and us running a whole bunch of AI bullshit inside of it is just actually collapsing the narrative generation capacity of the simulation.

    Damnit.

    I've now made the fever dream even more ludicrous.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I mean that's obvious, but it's a pretty shitty coverup if everyone knows it's being covered up. And that one name in particular is on the list.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    One of the most useful and intentional products of an obvious and blundering conspiracy is the open demonstration that the participants are literally beyond the reach of reason or the law.

    It promotes apathy, helplessness, and cynicism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    You know what you’ve gotta do Elon. I’m cool with you walking if you spill the beans. You know you want to.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    It's like modern wrestling all over again... 😞

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    wwe maybe (am curious when HH Helmseley has a wrestler come out and pick a side).

    AEW (and CMLL and Stardom and NJPW) are not this shit. Hell, a few weeks back AEW had one of the biggest faces of the company come out in Arena Mexico and give a decent-ish Spanish promo about how his family owed so much to Mexican immigrant workers and how he learned so much from them and how we are better when we work together. The same night a different wrestler came out in an "Abolish ICE" shirt.

    So don't drag wrestling down. It is basically just TKO (WWE+UFC) that still runs on redneck hate and bigotry

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    I thought they were referring to kayfabe? But I know nothing about wrestling.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago*

    "Kayfabe" is carnie speak for "scripted". And, like all writing, it is a reflection of the writers.

    WWE has a long history of kayfabe bits that clearly reflect the views of those in power. Just look at all the times the rapist and sex trafficker forced female talent to kiss his ass in the ring or otherwise degrade themselves. Same with all the horrifically racist arcs (Triple H, the current savior of all of pro wrestling, had a ridiculously racist series of matches and promos against a black guy... that he won).

    NJPW and CMLL have their own cultural weirdnesses that I can't fully comment on. But AEW... look, yes, it is owned by a billionare (and his father) in Florida and you gotta acknowledge that carnies gonna carnie. But it is well worth remembering that when a talent (Ricochet) started his historically incel bullshit and wanted to do an andrew tate character he was allegedly told to shut the fuck up and that character didn't last the week. And then you have people like Adam Page/Stephen Woltz, Brody King/Nathan Blauvelt, and Thunder Rosa/Melissa Cervantes who are all pretty openly left wing (arguably leftist) who were allowed to make political statements on live television and PPVs speaking to the plight of immigrants in trump's america.

    Let alone the two biggest storylines in AEW being a millennial cowboy with imposter syndrome and alcoholic tendencies working through his problems with borderline live therapy versus toxic masculinity and a bi as fuck lunatic who had an entire year long storyline of fighting her ex in the most lesbian storyline ever put on mainstream TV.

    Wrestline is a minefield. But pretending wrestling would entertain this shit is just normalizing WWE which people obviously need to watch because "Roman Reigns is the greatest story ever told and Cody Rhodes solved racism".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    So with Trump and Musk, which is The Undertaker and which is Mankind?

    Or are they BOTH The Undertaker and we’re all Mankind?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (16 children)

    It doesn't matter.

    If someone unearthed video of Trump raping an 11-year-old, Republicans would love him even more, his approval ratings would go up, leaders on the "religious right" would explain that it's all Biblical, and Trump would successfully sue for the profits from video sales.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    I’d usually agree with this sentiment, but the MAGAsphere actually seems to be breaking with him on this one. The chuds are upset about this, and it might not go away so easily, especially now that he’s attacking his base over this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

    Well one of the things that nobody seems to have considered is that Elon has a bot army, an AI, and Twitter he can turn against Trump.

    In addition, and it may or may not be a coincidence, but he's not as buddy buddy with Putin as he once was.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

    I absolutely believe Putin is fueling this. President Vance is a collaborative agent for Peter Thiel and the Heritage Foundation. Heritage is a longtime Putin ally. The question is, will MAGA stop questioning their echo chamber after Trump is put out to rot? That is the gamble, and they are going for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -18 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    I absolutely believe Putin is fueling this.

    Yeah, but liberals believe that Putin is behind everything, so that's not surprising

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Just because we think Putin is behind everything doesn't mean he's not behind this exact thing. The same way just because you're paranoid it doesn't mean you're not being followed

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    ... because he has a ton of global influence??? He's former KGB, one of the greatest misinformation diseminators of history. If you don't believe that, you likely consume some of it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Ok. That doesn't mean he's behind literally everything the way liberals make out. The KGB were second rate information manipulators compared to domestic US operations anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    You are making a strawman argument. I didn't say I am liberal, nor did I say Putin does everything. I said Putin is likely behind this, because Putin definitely has compromat on Trump. I also said he has global influence, which he does. These statements are obvious, supported by overwhelming evidence, and not so broad as your strawman

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -11 points 1 year ago* (1 child)
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago*

    Those are not examples of me making fallacies, those are examples of me not writing more content than I did. You made a strawman, actively constructing a lie.

    It is certainly well evidenced, as I said, that Putin is a disinfo maestro. I simply am not doing your research for you.

    I will not be replying to you point by point because your points are hollow and repetitive. Enjoy fighting for a genocidal autocrat online.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    If you truly believe this, you need to take a step back from one or more echo chambers, because you've lost touch with reality.

    Trump waffling on the topic, without any 'hard' evidence, has already caused momentum in the opposite direction.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    But it’s just performative resistance. They still vote to give him everything he wants every time without exception.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    But it’s just performative resistance.

    That's your assumption, not a fact. If hard evidence of Donald Trump literally raping a child was made public during his last campaign, I'd bet my life savings he wouldn't be President today.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    No shit? Does he think we don’t know that?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    It's more that because of elon's single-mindedness and pettiness that we can measure his effect on the platform and extrapolate that to other social media. So this would give us a good basis of measurement for the forced memes that big tech companies want us to spread when they aren't being so obvious.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 4 points 1 year ago (7 children)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    4 upvotes, no downvotes, removed by mod and banned. Huh.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Considering the shit that gets upvoted on Lemmy that's not saying much.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    Yeah, I'm rather confident that bots are rampant on here. All the wrong news sites are constantly the ones that are upvoted the most. The bots don't care who you hate, just that you hate. It doesn't matter if it is leaders, minorities, businesses, other nations, or whatever.

    The bots agenda is to make it harder for people to work together in unison. Create disruptions and lower the operational efficiency of other nations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Someone get me video when ICE comes for him!

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    1 comment in c/Conservatives@hilariouschaos.com view that post