whats your thought on open relationship? if both living in different states

top 98 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 39 points 1 month ago

As long as both are consenting adults, whatever I think doesn't matter.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    So ive been in open poly relationships before and am very sex positive. The problem is several fold and it mostly comes down to education of everyone involved and comfort of all parties.

    1. There needs to be solid trust and communication between all members. If you dont have this it will fail. This is why going open will never fix a broken relationship.
    2. Some people arent able to let go of the jealous feeling of their partner being with someone else and thats ok it just means being poly / open isnt for them.
    3. Everyone has to be ok with the arrangement before it happens. None of this "I get to kiss/fuck whoever I want but you dont" stuff.
    4. The reason you want to be open matters. Do you just find it exciting? Does your partner? Are you long distance and so want to keep your options open? Does the partner know that? Are you into a kink your partner isnt into and they are ok with you experimenting? Are you in love with multiple people and want them all and they are also cool with that? Giant cuddle puddle sounds great? It all comes down to trust again. It can NEVER be because you're trying to compensate for something your partner lacks without the consent of the partner

    If there are any hard feelings in the relationship they will be compounded. So make sure the relationship is solid first.

    Also being open doesnt automatically mean each person can do whatever they want. Talk yo your partner about partners you want to being in. Talk to the new people about your current partner. Make sure everyone is kosher about what's happening (and also make sure everyone is regularly getting tested for STDs)

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago

    It seems like an exhaustingly complex set of boundaries to keep and tends to create winners and losers out of third parties if the boundaries are rigidly followed in most cases. I think being that secure is somewhat admirable, but it also seems like a devastating fall to make if things don't work out. Different folks have different ways of doing things, I think it's fine, just not for me personally and I definitely wouldn't want to be the 3rd party to it either.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I think they can work and be fulfilling, but you have to be honest and trustworthy, and good about communicating.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago

    i try not too much concern myself with other peoples relationships

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    If it works, it works.
    Considering that people often hookup just for sex, I don't see why it couldn't work in this case.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I think why you are choosing to do it matters. I think open relationships can be successful, but like are you doing it to keep a relationship on the rocks going? Or are you both legitimately capable of polyamory and able to be available to each other and your other partners in a way that doesn't feel demeaning to anyone involved?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    I'm newly poly and my wife and girlfriend both live in town, but it's really fulfilling for all of us

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 month ago (8 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (7 children)

    It's been a long road but when I met GF I knew I wanted to date her and that I didn't want to cheat. She is happily married and was already poly so I talked to my wife about it. It was suuuuper weird at first, but now we're all friends. The most important thing about being poly- what makes it poly instead of just cheating- is openness and honesty. Just be honest and everything will work out for you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 month ago (6 children)

    so if like my wife ask that poly with her senior so its good?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (5 children)

    Ok so to be poly everyone involved has to be good with it, and if you're not comfortable then it's not poly; it's cheating. My wife wasn't comfortable at first so we talked about it and now she is, but it's definitely not for everyone. The mononormative worldview in our society is DEEPLY ingrained. For the people in my polycule it's healthy and good for us, and all four of us have a good relationship with each other.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (11 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Yep, do open poly if you want, but this arrangement here just seems like "I want permission to cheat" more than "I want an open relationship". Sounds like they found someone else and don't have the stones to break up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago*

    Yeah but anyone who sees sex in an open relationship as cheating, probably was never actually in an open relationship.

    Its like saying going outside is just permission to leave the windows open - like there are no windows outside, and if you're finding walls windows supported by ceilings, there's a good chance youre still inside.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 month ago (8 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (7 children)

    You’re living in different states, every relationship work well with communication. An open one doubly so and your geographical position doesn’t create a good setting for it to work

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 month ago (6 children)

    so its good that she kiss her senior?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (5 children)

    That’s not what I said. What I said was the distance will work against you in this open relationships.

    If she already kiss another person without talking with you before, this is not an open relationship.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 month ago (4 children)

    he kiss her but the she constantly inform me

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    waste of time.

    way too many people pursue the wrong people and do stuff like open relationships as a cope.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (18 children)

    I'm polyamorous myself, I think it's just important to clearly establish rules about it with the people you are dating. Personally, my only rule is that anyone already in the relationship needs to agree when adding a new person. If someone says no, then it's no

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 month ago (17 children)

    if husband and wife both agree then its cool?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (16 children)

    Basically yes, then if you want to add another person after, husband, wife, and the person that was added before need to agree to add the next person

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 month ago (15 children)

    like can we share one thing like me and my partner both live in other city, so actually in other city she hug one friend so she ask me

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (14 children)

    If they are only a friend and not actually part of the relationship, you just need consent of the people in the relationship. That's what I do when flirting online with people, I have the consent of everyone in my relationship (only my bf for now)

    So as long as she keeps you aware and that you say it's fine, it's perfectly ok in my opinion

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 month ago (13 children)

    so she can keep that relationship?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (12 children)
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 month ago (11 children)

    can i share detail in message?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (10 children)
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 month ago (9 children)

    she asking me can she invite him in home?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (8 children)

    That's for you to decide if you are ok with it or not

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 month ago (6 children)

    ya sometimes but according to you?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (5 children)

    For me, I prefer when both me and my bf can be flirty with the person. If the person prefers me or my bf, I fear that it could lead to jealousy, so I try to make sure everyone gets their fair share of flirting :3

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 month ago (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

    coz one thing happened, hey are any other platform also?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Open relationships may work, if you're both comfortable knowing the other sleeps with other people. But living in different states? That sounds more like fuck buddies than a relationship to me.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I haven't been able to subdue/erase/accept the emotion of jealousy, which sort of makes me unable to enjoy the wonders of it, but I wish I could. 😭

    With that said, I am a relationship anarchist. 😊 I don't believe in distinctions and labels. There is only what you and I have, period. Regardless of whether it's sexual, romantic, platonic or whatever.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Without a commitment of some kind, that's not a romantic relationship. That's a non-binding letter of intent for a friends-with-benefits situation at a TBD date some time in the future with caveats and escape clauses. It's about as much of a relationship as mutual swiping on tinder.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)

    so if both are in different city its not good?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

    It's not about the location so much as the expectations and praticalities.
    An 'open relationship' as a status requires a commitment from both people to maintain commitment to the relationship but allow casual sexual interactions outside of the relationship. That's hard for a lot of, if not the large majority of, people, even when both people are in close proximity. If you take away the commitment element, it's not a romantic relationship, it's just casual or friend sex, which can be fine too, but has different expectations.
    A traditional long-distance relationship also requires commitment. Ask anyone who has tried to have an LDR. It requires a HEAVY commitment, and a lot of every day effort to maintain the non-physical intimacy of the relationship over that distance. Are you ready to spend all day writing texts, call each other when you have a few moments at the same time just to hear each other's voices, and spend all evening on the phone talking about the most pointless BS that happened that day just because you love hearing about each other's BS? If you got the chance to go visit, but you were exhausted from working overtime and it would cost everything you got as extra from the overtime and then a bit more, would you drop everything just to go see them for one day? These commitments, if they are going to withstand the difficulties of life, are usually on the order of 'we will be getting married or entering a solemnified union of some kind but circumstances outside of our control make that impossible for now.' If either of the people aren't ready to commit to that level of dedication and permanence, the relationship, while possibly previously good, is not likely to be able to withstand the strain of each person's needs and desires being deferred by the practical realities, again and again and again. You have to ask yourselves, and each other, out loud, whether that level of commitment is there. If it's not, it's far healthier for everyone involved to say 'This isn't something to call a relationship. I won't wait for you, and I don't expect you to wait for me, but I'll be super fucking happy to try again when we're both living in the same place if we're not monogamous with someone else.'

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    So its good if both want open relationship?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    It can technically be made to work, but it will be extremely hard. It's combining two difficult to manage relationship dynamics into one VERY difficult one. Both people wanting an open relationship is only the bare minimum starting point. It takes a LOT more than that to even begin to make it work.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    ITT: polyphobia

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    Been working for me for over a decade. I love my wife dearly, she's not as sexual as I am, she likes hearing about my encounters with other women, it works for us. It won't work for everyone, and requires a ton of communication and respect.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    If trust and communication are on point, its cool.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    if both living in different states

    Key context right there.

    Either you stay deliberately ignorant about what happens when you're apart, or you're going to feel the same as you would about it normally.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    I might consider either an open relationship or a long distance relationship, but the problem in both cases would be I'd worry more about it falling apart and being replaced, both of those at once seems like a lot.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    I don't see being able to handle it. I find the sex hormones are kinda linked to the jelously hormones. I really can't handle someone I am with being with someone else. Of course my hormones are assholes so it would likely be no problem with a bunch of people where exclusively with me. thats why the harem fantasy is so big.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I would not rule it out, but if I were to guess it's not something for me.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    My thought is "Why?".

    I fell like you need to people who are radically honest with others and I don't understand why the long distance relationship is being maintained.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (1 child)

    I'm split on it. I'm involved with someone who is in one, which basically means I am in one. I don't really want to see anyone else, myself. He already had another BF when we met. Sometimes I wish I was the only one so he'd give me more attention cuz we see each other maybe once a week, if he's not busy wifh work or school or his other friends. Which makes it feel like I'm just the one he sees when he can't see anyone else.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    Not for me. I don't do remote either

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    that's "a relationship" just not the one I could understand

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (5 children)
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 month ago (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)

    Relationships that start out open have a higher chance of success, but opening a previously closed one almost always ends in disaster. The thing is, neither of you will know how you'll feel until after it's too late. It's not worth the risk, if you care about your relationship.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

    so according to you open relationship is always better than closed?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

    That's a highly individual question, I personally couldn't do it. I trend towards the anxious side, and I tend to be a bit jealous. Even if I worked on myself for the rest of my life, I don't think I would ever be really happy with it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    I wouldn't like it in that situation, no. If you aren't together and are doing other people but not each other what exactly is your relationship?

    The only way I think it really works is if you are so hot together it pulls other people in, and if you are both wired to be turned on by hearing about the sex with other people, and have extremely good communication, like to the point it would annoy most people. It can't be to fill a hole (ha ha) in the relationship you have. It can be good if you are both enthusiastic about it for sure. I don't personally know anyone who has successfully used it one sided to manage a libido difference, though the top comment here is a guy saying he does that.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›