post
Probably not because it's extremely useless for 99% of people lol
Does the average person know that a stalagmite is mostly calcium carbonate?
No. Most people think you can throw a lit cigarette or lighter on it and it will go up instantly too because of movies. I think Die Hard 2 was the worst lol, he like threw a zippo in the puddle of her fuel and then it followed the plane in mid air to blow it up.
I don't think people know how octane level works either. I think they assume higher octane is easier to combust when it's the exact opposite.
And octane doesn’t grant magical horsepowers to your engine if you pour a can of octane boost in the tank.
Of all the media out there, action movies might be the worst for rotting brains. People can actually seperate porn or cartoons from reality.
I don't know how easily it blows up, I'm too cool to turn around and watch the explosion
The entire point of jet fuel is that it DOESN'T "blow up easily", though.
unlike gasoline, It actually takes quite a bit of effort to ignite avgas in it's liquid form because it's designed to be aerosolized before being ignited.
Avgas and jet fuel aren't the same thing. Avgas is leaded gasoline used in airplane engines. Jet fuel is specially formulated for use in turbines.
And... Is this post about 9/11?
No one mentioned 9-11. I'm not sure what you're getting at.
I assume it's a reference to one of the 9/11 conspiracy theories.
The claim was that jet fuel doesn't burn at a high enough temperature to melt steel. Therefore a bunch of burning jet fuel alone wouldn't have been enough to collapse the towers. Therefore someone must have put something else there.
Even XKCD got in on the joke. https://xkcd.com/966/
You are nearly spot on: it isn't just the heat it will produce, but the lack of ignition due to the oxygen required for ignition.
Um...
Think things through.
I thought Avgas was 100ll, not jet fuel?
I can't remember the which is which. I just remember that Avgas and 100ll are the two types of aviation fuel. My brain doesn't have the ability to remember which is which. Which is probably why it's a good thing I'm not a pilot...
Once years ago, I used a few mL of gasoline as a solvent to clean grease from a part. To dispose of it, I put it in a can and tossed a lit match in.
The liquid gasoline extinguished the flame. Even gasoline is hard to ignite.
Its high flash point also makes it hard to ignite making it safer than gasoline.
Damn, forgot my lighter...
*Pulls out electric baton
*Gas station explodes
From a comic by MoringMark about Knights of Guinevere characters
Does the average person know that it costs $2500 in fuel to get a boeing 747 off the ground?
So like four people in Business class cover it...
Yeah, I thought it was supposed to be the main expense for airlines.
Edit: Oh, that's literally just takeoff.
Yeah I can imagine the rest of business class pays for the flight and economy is just a cherry on top. I mean they keep making the seats smaller to can in more fish. Some older planes you can tell they were fitted with the modern small seats. Paid for the window view? Enjoy your wall view. Then overbooking. And the kicker, your luggage requirements keep shrinking, so they can ship things.
https://liveandletsfly.com/united-airlines-f35-parts-israel-passenger-flights/
Airlines are going bankrupt all over the place, though, so it's not like they're making massive margins. Basically, people just prefer a shitty seat on a cheap flight.
Bro the average person doesn't even know you can compile software for different architectures.
They aren't gonna know about jet fuel which is almost as complex
The average person probably has no idea what cracking is to begin with.
I bet the average person knows it can't melt steel beams.
And the average person should also know that steel doesn't need to melt to lose a lot of it's load bearing capacity. At 500-600 Celsius, only 50% of steel strength remains.
Because no one takes shop class and bends some steel stock.
Which, going right back around to jet engines, is why superalloys are a thing.
They aren't stronger or even more refractory than normal steel, just more expensive, but they don't soften at all until they're about to melt.
Plus there would be wind fanning those flames hard which could raise the temperature some.
But the other thing to consider is that the towers could have been built with substandard materials in the first place.
Plus all the mind control chemicals they use to make the chemtrails probably burnt really hot. /s
IIRC, the materials were fine, but the spray-on fireproofing left large patches uncovered. While not a direct cause, it certainly didn't help.
WTYP has a pretty good episode on the entire thing
This just in: scientists have determined that a more direct cause for the towers falling than defective spray-on fireproofing may exist. Rumors have begun to circulate that the WTCs collapse may be attributed to the two aircraft which collided with them. Details at 6.
(I kid, I kid)
Well, it would've collapsed either way, as you can see on the pictures during the fire that the metal is starting to buckle uniformly around the entire floor with the fire. But patches without insulation probably meant that it collapsed sooner than it could've.
Didn't help anyone trapped, so the net result is the same in that I fail to see how 30 minutes extra before it crumbled would've made any difference
Plus aluminum, which planes are made of, does burn hot enough to melt steel beams. And concrete weakens in a fire as well.
I knew, but only because I read a lot of cold war stories, and for war becomes hot stories. Running a jet on cooking kerosene was a plot point in one
I have since read about just engines and jet fuel
I don't work in that industry at all. I'm an IT systems analyst
Probably not. Same as movie directors don't seem to know what happens when you throw a lit cigarette in gasoline: it puts it out. Diesel doesn't ignite even with a match.
Likely not. I thought it was highly volatile until I learned it was basically kerosene.
I don't think they do. I'm a person that likes aviation and I never think about jet fuel.
No. I wager the average person thinks its some kind of super dangerous super powered liquid explosion magic, because the average person is kind of an idiot.
I, however, did know its fancy kerosene
No. I'd guess a lot of people, who don't work with it, think diesel blows up, even.
What the basic kinds of petroleum are, and which vehicles they go in, is one of those things any reasonably educated person should know, but the majority of the population actually won't.
I’ve known it since the 7th grade and I ain’t particularly bright.
I was in school training to be an aircraft mechanic when I learned that. I remember thinking, "that's crazy"
I personally didnt and now it makes me question whether it can melt steel beams
Melt, no. Compromize the structural integrity? Absolutely.
Don't need to melt steel beams to destroy a structure. Don't need the jet fuel to be providing all the heat once the structure is on fire either.
You start the barbeque with a lighter but it's the charcoal that's cooking dinner
Also basically the same as diesel fuel. All three are interchangeable in an emergency situation. They each have different additives and are taxed differently. Also home heating oil too.





all 94 comments