you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

No one mentioned 9-11. I'm not sure what you're getting at.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    I assume it's a reference to one of the 9/11 conspiracy theories.

    The claim was that jet fuel doesn't burn at a high enough temperature to melt steel. Therefore a bunch of burning jet fuel alone wouldn't have been enough to collapse the towers. Therefore someone must have put something else there.

    Even XKCD got in on the joke. https://xkcd.com/966/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    You are nearly spot on: it isn't just the heat it will produce, but the lack of ignition due to the oxygen required for ignition.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments