all 87 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 126 points 1 month ago (6 children)

yeah that sounds like a totally mentally stable guy

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    And you know if he’s arguing against regulation that they’ve got some seriously evil plans in the pipeline to roll out and profit from or extract power/control from. Also all you need to do is look at the favorability rates between the US and China on ai, US citizens really really distrust and don’t look forward do more ai, whereas China already has implemented tons of serious regulation and controls on ai and the polls are sky high for favorability and looking forward to more ai in china.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Plans? I doubt he’s got any plans. Vague promises, buzzwords, and bribes from techbros? Oh yeah he’s got a boatload of that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago

    You’re not paying attention if you think this guy doesn’t always have a plan to profit from the chaos and extortion opportunities once he’s overtly fucked up a system so bad it’s literally killing people.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Oh no he has plans. As much of an idiot as he can seem, he always has a plan. It's not a good plan and it's always self serving, but he has a plan. Nothing leaves that man's lips that isn't trying to manipulate and deceive and control things to go the way he wants them to.

    This is something people have to be careful about. He may seem like a bumbling idiot, and for the things people actually care about he is. But his actions have reasons. Usually it's to deliberately cause issues that benefits him or the people paying him. He's a narcissist. He's not just goofing around, he wants to put white people in power, he wants funding for billionaires, he wants the world to bend to him because maybe he will just attack someone unprovoked, he wants people to struggle and be dependent on the most meager lifestyles they can.

    They're not good plans, and they're never in the interest of all American people. But if you think he does stuff for "no reason" then you've already been tricked. The man wants to hold all the strings and get whatever he wants by whatever means necessary.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 74 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    Word count: 126

    All caps words: 15 (excluding acronyms)

    All caps ratio: 11.9%

    Unnecessarily capitalised words: 9

    Unnecessarily caps ratio: 7.1%

    Exclamation marks: 12

    Quotes: 4

    Pants shid: 2 (estimate)

    Unhingeness level: 7/10

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 53 points 1 month ago (10 children)

    americans elected this guy.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    But only ~30% of the population, and those people only after 70 years of education cuts, misinformation, and religious indoctrination…it took the GOP a long time, but they got what they wanted. It’s a real endorsement for perseverance. And amoral greed, I guess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    You need to add in those that didn't vote.

    If you don't vote then you automatically support who is elected.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago*

    They knew he was a possibility and still didn't bother showing up to prevent his reelection after he had led an insurrection for being voted out the first time.

    At the bare minimum anyone who didn't show up to vote is complicit.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 25 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    I know stuff has been said before, but when the president says basically "we have to do this and we will do it" and "if you dont like it we will brand you a treasonous traitor" for something you have very strong opinions about, its kind of scary.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    yeah there's a reason the USA is considered a hostile nation now

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    We were never not considered hostile, we just had a ton of offsetting soft power. There's just less of a reason to deal with us now that we cut soft power.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    nah, Canadians definitely didn't see the USA as actively hostile. now, quite a few do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    Person in Canada here! This is true, mainly because of the whole "constantly threatening to invade us, shit-talking the Prime Minister non-stop, starting an idiotic trade war and trying to rename our lakes" thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    All the strong and smart people I know are CONSTANTLY reminding everyone how STRONG AND SMART (High IQ!) they are.

    They also commonly use the term "Treasonists".

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 month ago

    Well I was against AI before, but now that I've read the demented gibberings of this 80 year old shit-encrusted pedophile on the subject, I'm convinced!

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    The only bad things that hes referencing that anthropic did, is they refused to allow the military to use their Ai to be used in autonomous kill weapons, and be used as survalience against the people of the united States.

    And anthropic still does both of those things lol. So if those are the bad guys, you can only immagine what the good ai "people" do. Which is assist in the genocide in Gaza, help surveil the people who don't like it, and generate pro us, pro ai propaganda for his friends media companies like Jeff bezos. If you don't like the fact trump made it illegal for the states to regulate ai in anyway (including generating ai csam), then you are a anti tech extremist, terrorist, and traitorist.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago

    The US has high IQ presidents in spades?

    Then maybe we should elect one of them.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago

    "High IQ"

    "Treasonists"

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Honestly surprised he spelled AI correctly.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago

    Ah yes, the AI "people".

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago

    "things"

    Dementia has diminished his vocabulary significantly, if he's specifying with generalities

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago

    The first time they are saying something believable:

    we have tremendous criminal and regulatory power over these companies.

    They do wield criminal power frequently, in the pursuit of their own gain

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago

    So even if this were true, isn't that like... Really bad? That our safety regarding AI lies solely on the IQ of one man? That changes every 4 to 8 years?

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago

    Assuming there is a future, people will look back on this time and expect that we were all this goddamned dumb.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    If you end your messages with "Thank you for your attention to this matter" it makes you look like a real professional business man. If you're really skilled, add an exclamation mark!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago

    His mommy called him an idiot when he was a child and he can't get over it.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    But why, some say, our noses? Why choose this as our goal? And they may well ask, why climb the highest mountain? Why, 35 years ago, fly the Atlantic? Why does Rice play Texas? We choose to cut off our noses. We choose to cut off our noses... We choose to cut off our noses in this social media post and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they will hurt those who can't afford healthcare and we can send those noses to billionaires; because that goal will serve to organize and measure how pacified you have all become, because that challenge is one that will make us laugh, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one we intend to grossly profit off of using Polymarket, and the others, too.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

    Wait, no, he considers himself high IQ? LOL. LMAO even

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    No typos, stays generally on topic, I'm skeptical he's capable of writing this legibly. Does anyone do semantic analysis of his posts for attribution?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • I'd just settle for one that doesn't shit himself, doesn't lie, doesn't touch kids, doesn't start pointless wars, doesn't upset the entire world economy, isn't a cry baby, is smart. You know, basically anyone else.

  • source
  • Okay, this cannot be real...

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    This gives me the impression that they know China is winning.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Not technically winning but close behind at a fraction of the money spent developing it. Ultimately the prize seem to be that whoever gets the ongoing money from enterprise stuff is the winner. But that can fluctuate monthly.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    He thinks he's strong and smart, but he's weak and dumb.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    What exactly does "having criminal power over someone" even mean?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    None of the AI bond villain statements this weekend have any policy recommendations that would slow US military/surveillance/gestapo/bond villain use of LLM/AI tools. They are only promoting/perfecting the guardrails on models that are released to the public.

    Who wins AI, Wins

    Can only be understood as a race for skynet. Any production/productivity benefit from AI made by Americans, can be enhanced by access to more models on price/speed/performance curve. The data centers can all run open models too, and somehow this only growing part of US economy can get more ROI with access to best/cheapest models.

    Therefore, winning is not based on helping people the most. It is an open declaration, and based on killing/oppressing people the most. The previous administration viewed global warming as an opportunity to beat China in profifting from its technology sector to pursue green energy. There is massive employment opportunities from just deploying whatever is the cheapest/abundant available green energy in far higher volume because the savings/payback is that much more attractive.

    The only reason 30+ year solar energy, and 20+ year EV lifetimes are "falsely demonized as foreign dependence", when 1 year replacement shoes/apparel are not, is the oligarchy controlling your propaganda to protect their profits. All industry is moving towards more automation and less employment.

    Nationalist rivalry policy thought must be exterminated. Only way to avoid skynet. Policy that focuses on making the nation the best possible place to live is what creates national prosperity, and extreme employment for anyone wanting a share of that prosperity growth. https://naturalfinance.blogspot.com/2026/09/a-global-prosperity-manifesto.html

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    Whoever wins AI, wins.

    Meanwhile, it pillages electrical, water, and construction resources away from populouses and it adds noise and light pollution while granting few jobs in return. People were okay with factories that paid, but this? No.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Wish he would use AI to write his posts......

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Do you remember the days when a funny post could win one internet? What must you post to win AI?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    This guy was all in on the windmills kill whales conspiracy, yet this is the one he believes is a conspiracy. Im so ready for this entire decade to be over with...

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    mark me down as a terrorist and you will see how much terror I can strike into the hearts of treasonous pedophiles.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Stop paying attention to this turd, he is living propaganda, his sole purpose is to distract you with pointless nonsense. Every time you see a statement or post or whatever from him, ignore it and look elsewhere to see what they are distracting you from.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    BEWARE, WE'RE COMING FOR YOU.

    Meanwhile, many Americans (and other DECENT humans) wish for this man's timely expiration multiple times a day. In public forums, using direct threats. Unless they're a darker shade of khaki or green, they ain't coming for nobody, especially those willing to stand up against them. We can't meet them at their level when knee-jerk legislation is fisted through the corrupt courts, but go-on, step onto my front porch, if you will.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago
    [–] 1 point 1 month ago
    [+] -11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (7 children)

    Leakers, BEWARE!

    Doesn't need a login:
    https://www.facebook.com/tom.adelsbach/videos/breaking-donald-trump-causes-an-international-incident-during-his-meeting-with-i/1410843840467056/

    EDIT: If there's an issue with the link, maybe you could use the power of words to describe what it is, ey gang?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

    That's the most painfully obvious AI I've seen in a while.

    The puddle grows onto the back of the chair after he stands up.

    It starts to spread so much that it starts to drip onto the floor. What, is his piss supposed to have multiplied?

    Her reaction doesn't seem natural at all. Why does she keep screaming? Why does she stare at it? Why does she point at it and not look away? Why does her face look like she's screaming in anger? (I'll tell you: because AI only knows how to generate one kind of screaming face.) Besides, fucking listen to that scream. The weird strangulated gurgle in the middle of it. That's not a human running out of breath, that's an AI voice generator glitching out because there aren't any examples of screams that long in its training data.

    Lastly, this is obviously fake because everyone knows Trump wears Depends.*

    Did you genuinely think this was real, or are we just supposed to be entertained by it? If the latter, what made you think Lemmy would appreciate a slop video?

    * - I don't know this for a fact, but nearly all 80 year olds do, and it's funny to make fun of him for.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Thanks for the power of words, and your reply.

    Did you genuinely think this was real...?

    I'd read about the problem, seen a couple pics, heard a wide range of people either talk about his stench or visibly demonstrate that fact, and thought this video was genuine, yes. So yes indeed, my bad. I'm not the greatest at spotting AI, and frankly I was rushing in this case.

    If you like, I can do a more extensive job finding vetted, corroborated, real pics (and maybe vids) demonstrating the nastiness. Would you like to know more?

    I don’t know this for a fact, but nearly all 80 year olds do, and it’s funny to make fun of him for.

    Most 80yr olds I've met and known don't necessarily smell like excrement, and don't dramatically bulge around their backside areas due to wearing layers of diapers. They also don't wear lifts, pitching them forward in a visibly weird way, amongst a slew of crazy shit that could be talked about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

    Also, please don't link to Facebook. Lemmings don't like tracking cookies. You know how it is. Downloading the video with yt-dlp and then uploading it to Lemmy really isn't hard. See watch:

    Also, before assuming a video is real, I would look at the watermark in the lower right corner, google it, and make sure it doesn't belong to an artist whose gallery website is the first result.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (2 children)

    Thanks. Yeah, as stated, I was in a hurry and couldn't find an alternate source for the vid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments