great to know!

top 96 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 98 points 1 month ago (12 children)

You could always fold an iPhone. It's just, you could only do it once

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (8 children)

    To be fair, you can do anything once

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    No, I can't climb Mt. Everest.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] 54 points 1 month ago (31 children)

    Honestly. I'm ok with this.

    Google: Fix google fucking drive. Stop this AI shit and put the billions of dollars into making your products basically functional.

  • source
  • hideshow 31 child comments
  • [–] 55 points 1 month ago (27 children)

    At this point, anyone disappointed by Google has self inflicted wounds. Unless your employer forces you to use it, there's really no excuse to not Degoogle.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 27 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (23 children)

    What's the best alternative to Google Drive?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 61 points 1 month ago (9 children)

    I keep a 1tb usb drive in my ass at all times

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (4 children)
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Not all of us have room for multiple 1tb drives.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    That's why you settle for a single 8 TB 3.5 inch disc. It just has a better value.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    The best that I'm aware of that's almost exactly the same and not the different (but better options already said): mega.io

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    This looks like a good alternative. If only there was an automated way to move everything from gdrive to here. Still, might be worth the manual downloading and uploading elsewhere. Thanks

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    I have Nextcloud running on my home server, hooked up to a 2tb drive. It's kind of a pain the ass to have to maintain, but less of a pain in the ass than relying on Google.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I think of all the unified tech ecosystems, Apple is hands down the best but Google is still the best non-Apple option. The only other option I think is Microsoft, and I would rather drown in burning gasoline than go back to anything Microsoft touches.

    Obviously the best option is to host your own stuff through open source, which I am doing, but it's taking time, it's a lot of work to keep up with. Google gives me a bunch of barely passable tools accessible from anything with an internet connection.

    I did degoogle for browser and search though. Firefox and Kagi makes the internet almost tolerable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    I have a friend who works for Google, in a non-computer science department but one that does require some amount of decent computer hardware (compute, IO, etc.) They go through this cycle every year or so; their team uses MacBook Pros because it fits their needs the best -> department heads above them see this and take the MacBook Pros away and replace them with Chromebooks -> team cannot accomplish their goals on the Chromebooks, so they lobby up the chain and eventually get their MBPs back -> … ad infinitum.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 53 points 1 month ago (10 children)

    Apple being shit at AI might actually be a blessing. When the bubble pops, they won’t have lost so much, and until then they can get AI companies to pay to be the Siri model (not sure if that’s what they are actually doing though).

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    This is literally Apple’s business model. It’s intentional. They are intentionally focused on slow sustained growth rather than the incredibly volitile BS other tech companies chase. Late to the game? Nobody cares. Something is a flop? They weather it. The butterfly keyboard was a disaster for Apple and it didn’t hurt them at all. They can take the blow if then the occasional flop because their risks are lower and planned out. They let everyone else spin their wheels while they iterate their designs based on what others failed at.

    The M-series chips going gangbusters on AI is no coincidence, but at the same time, if the buyer doesn’t care about AI, that unified memory benefits them in other ways anyway. Because they planned out everything.

    Which makes the Apple mouse that much more baffling.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    The Apple mouse is fine, you leave it on charger when you go into a meeting and you'll have a few weeks of usage again.

    Probably wouldn't buy one personally, but if you want to use gestures on it, it's pretty decent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 31 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I think Apple could do AI as well as everyone else. They just recognized that everyone else is doing it badly because there's no good way to do it so they backed out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago

    I think I agree with this. When you look at what apple does, they take their time and wait to make sure the UX is good. Recently, we see it with the iPhone duo where they waited to have a product that looks nice, isn't too bulky and they reworked the UI to make sure the UX is good. They are not the type to dive head first into the AI slop, it's not their type. But internally, I'm sure they are experimenting and trying to polish the features for a good UX.

    I personnaly dislike Apple for other reasons, but I must give credit where credit is due. It is imo a good philosophy that I could get behind, but in Apple's case, there are too many red flags.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Apple is not a competitor for anthropic/openai, it's competitor to nvidia. Latest mac studio is very local AI capable, with 256gb uram and upcoming 512gb, while not terrible inference speed.

    They are selling shovels, basically.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Their previous model has been to sell hardware, rent media, and give software away.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago

    You're right for the push back, and I shouldn't directly kill you.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Apple: we are now going to spy on everyone through Apple watches

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    AI is a tool to do mass layoffs without making your stocks devalue. What happens after all the major companies do mass layoffs? Not a question investors are interested in, so it must be an externality with no barring on economics.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago

    All of it is bullshit to try and get a bailout from the government and a monopoly.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago (12 children)

    I don't buy it. I really do think this is just a weird form of advertising. Like, "WHOA THIS AI IS GONNA KILL US?! I wanna subscribe to see how powerful it is!"

    Absolute bologna. Just total hogwash. I mean full on horserubbish!

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [+] 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Something that works well enough? But who will think of the shareholders then? Isn't it just fabulous for them to increase their 10 billion to 10.2 billion by abolishing all human skill from the surface of Earth.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    If they do put it in ATC or dams or whatever, and there are deaths, I am optimistic enough that there are enough politicians isolated from it that they can ban AI from those usecases. I don't really think AI will ever effect 100% of earths population directly enough that it can't be controlled

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    What about the current state of the world makes you confident politicians would do a damn thing?

    With all due respect, the US quite literally has a pedophile running it.

    Nothing has been done about this at all, it's been years now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Maybe it'll just kill the billionaires?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    It's known as "criti-hype".

    Google:

    • Criti-hype critics: We have to rein Google in, they spy on absolutely everything you do, and as a result their advertising is like a mind control ray!
    • Google: Hey advertiser, did you hear, even our critics say our advertising is like a mind control ray, that's why you have to pay us so much.
    • The reality: Google doesn't even know enough to avoid showing people ads in languages they don't understand despite all their settings and all their usage being in a different language.

    Palantir

    • Criti-hype critics: Palantir tech must be stopped is so powerful that a human isn't even needed in the decision loop!
    • Palantir: Hey government, did you hear, even our critics say that we don't need a human in the decision loop!
    • The reality: Palantir suggests bombing a school.
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Iphone equipped with AI…

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Apple: I want to possess you, steal your money, then kill you.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Apple has always been late but made existing things more efficient and better. So just wait for few years and apple will find more efficient way to kill us all. \s

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Hint: they aren't going to kill you.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    Bullshit

    Bullshit

    Good for you. I still don't care.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Is there actually any benefit to having a phone that folds?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    It's really great if you like phones with extremely obvious points of failure. My wife had a zflip where the hinges got stuck and snapped, and they replacement they sent her had the flex cable inside malfunction to the point where it felt like the phone was going to melt. Two different ways to fail in the same spot. The future is here!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Weren’t fold phones a flop?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    No. And with the newer, wider form factor that Samsung started using this generation and clearly Apple is also using, there has been more excitement. The trifold phones have also generated a ton of excitement. That trifold Huawei looks amazing, but us Americans can't have it. I strongly considered a folding phone for my traveling job. A phone that could fold out tablet size for TV/movies/books sounds great for the plane/hotel.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Apple's now copying Samsung for development ideas.

  • source