GIMP is preparing to unleash a revolutionary new update—a high-performance, modern UI powerhouse designed to dismantle Adobe’s stranglehold on the industry.

To deliver the final blow to subscription-based creative tools, GIMP desperately needs testers right now.

Linux AppImages:

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gimp/-/jobs/7011657/artifacts/browse/build/linux/appimage/_Output/

Windows installer:

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gimp/-/jobs/7011659/artifacts/browse/build/windows/installer/_Output/

Linux Snap:

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gimp/-/jobs/7011658/artifacts/browse/build/linux/snap/_Output/

macOS:

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gimp/-/jobs/7011661/artifacts/browse/build/macos/dmg/_Output/

Windows MSIX:

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gimp/-/jobs/7011660/artifacts/browse/build/windows/store/_Output/

Just open the software and do random stuff.

  • Open different files

  • Use the text tool

  • Put an image in black and white

  • Convert files from one format to the other

If you spot any bug, please report it here:

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gimp/-/work_items/16712

Stop funding the corporate machine. Take back your software, test the build, and help launch the new era of open-source creation

all 91 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 37 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Why the urgency? You're linking to a normal, patch release. Did GIMP devs say something? Are you a GIMP dev?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    GIMP wants to release 3.2.6 and they're looking for stuff they need to do to improve from 3.2.5

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 31 points 2 months ago* (15 children)

    how recently can i have installed it? like, yesterday? HOW DO I DRAW A CIRCLE

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 2 months ago* (11 children)

    GIMP is meant more for retouching photos, not drawing shapes. If you mostly want to draw shapes from scratch, you probably want something like Krita or Inkscape instead.

    But if you really must draw a circle in GIMP, you make a circular selection and then fill it in with the bucket fill tool.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

    GIMP is meant more for retouching photos, not drawing shapes.

    Then why is there a brush tool which has stars and sparkles? Even the screenshot software Spectacle and Flameshot can draw circles effortlessly. Something this trivial is downright silly not to have as a feature. Every year I have a moment where I decide "okay, I'm gonna do this in GIMP", but then get so pissed off because something that should take less than five seconds takes ten minutes and tutorial, whereafter I go back to Photopea.

    Edit: I just discovered Pixelitor which now obviates my need for Photopea/GIMP. My review on AlternativeTo:

    “Impressive. Basically has every basic functionality what I looked for in GIMP, straightforward to boot, but which isn't in GIMP or too inconveniently so. Installing Pixelitor on every machine from now on.”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    GIMP and Adobe Photoshop are image editing programs. If you want to create your own vector images from scratch you use Inkscape or Adobe Illustrator

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago

    Circles ≠ Vectors. Sometimes I want to edit images by drawing circles around things. I'm actually serious, e.g., indicating locations where there is a leak and such. Freehand circles look ridiculous and unprofessional without a drawing tablet.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    I have used it to digitize and color drawings (i.e just take a picture of a pencil sketch and edit it).

    If you zoom in, you can get pretty good detail, drawing just with a mouse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago*

    That's a way different (and more well-suited) use-case because the edges are already there and you're just doing region selections and flood fills and whatnot. It's drawing the edges in the first place -- especially if they're geometric -- that GIMP isn't particularly good at.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago

    Use ellipse select tool with a fixed aspect ratio of 1:1. Then Select -> Border and choose a width. Then fill it with a color.

    Like yeah, it is 3 steps instead of having a dedicated "Shapes" tool with a bunch of options that would do the same. But GIMP is kind of built around selections, you do need to learn to use them if you ever want to use GIMP effectively. It's about as important as understanding layers.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 2 months ago (3 children)
  • bends over

    Test me, baby

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago

    Ive been a gimper since university.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I've been daily driving gimp for over a decade now.

    But these "revolutionary update" headlines are tiring. I've been listening that since 2.0, each minor patch is a "revolutionary gimp update". You go excited to see what they added and most of the time is nothing that important.

    Non destructive editing was probably the only "revolutionary" thing that was done in these last 10 years. And that's ok, the development pace is what it is.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago*

    "Brothers in arms, take up this rightful jihad against the Adobe scourge and throw every able man, woman, and child into this holy battle to make our voices heard. Lift up your hearts and let it be known that we the people shall no longer be oppressed by this hateful regime, and shall bring about the light of hope in a dying world by casting our lot into the boiling pot of battle-tested warriors, and right all the wrongs in the universe..."

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Where is this quoting from?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I think they are quoting themselves. I'm fairly sure they've posted this exact thing before, for other versions of GIMP

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    Is there an OG post to reference here?

    EDIT: Nice, big improvement on UI responsiveness with large font libraries. Still some room for improvement, but it was almost unusable before.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

    Who in the comments is an Adobe employee?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago

    Hello, this is Tim Adobe. Don't worry, we are working hard to make sure we remain the best. There's currently a team trying to figure out wtf a "gnu" is while another team figures out the maximum price increase our customer base will accept to give us a good budget to work with (previous profits were used on boats for executive team and some pizzas from the cheapest place my executive assistant could find with free delivery). Is Mr GIMP interested in selling?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    o7 Doing my civic duty in the fight to keep digital art in artists' hands.

  • source
  • [+] 60 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)
  • [–] 46 points 2 months ago

    I used to use Photoshop and indesign prolifically to shitpost to do great art work in the 2000s. I took a good decade and a half off and decided to go Gimp instead of a new version of Photoshop this year. I’m at about 80% of what I could smoothly do with Photoshop, and honestly I love it.

    I don’t think I could have made the switch if I didn’t take a super mega long break, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago* (4 children)

    If they could make it as dummy proof as Macromedia Fireworks from the 2000s, they would make transitioning creative work in Linux a bit easier. And this is coming from a Linux user since 2008.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    You mean Inkscape? I think that's more Inkscape's wheelhouse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    I regularly use both. Inkscape and Gimp could benefit from ux improvements that ease newbies in, with intuitiveness being front and center.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (12 children)

    I am going to get slammed here ... but GIMP is just way too complex to use. Maybe the new UI will be better, but the old UI is not just clunky or slightly bad ... it is UNUSABLE by normal people.

    Draw a circle in GIMP. Draw a square. Yea ... how long did that take to figure out?

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    New Ui announced, testers needed. What do you do? Complain about the old UI. Smart.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Sit anybody in front of Photoshop for the first time and it will be the same.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah it's literally not for you. Its like opening up cad (engineering tool) and complaining that there's a learning curve. My good friend is a graphic designer. I tried to get them to use gimp when they couldn't pay for photoshop anymore but it sounded like they just wanted to rip their hair out because of how behind photoshop it is. Gimp needs the basic features that are expected from photoshop for people to be willing to transition. You would be better off trying a graphic design bootcamp.

    I will try to convince them to test it out but they just got access to photoshop again so it's unlikely they'll want to touch gimp anytime soon😮‍💨

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    it is UNUSABLE by normal people.

    I guess I am not a normal person then. I have been using GIMP happily for more than 20 years now. FWIW, I rarely need to draw circles.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    I’ve used GIMP in the past. I don’t understand it, but it’s free and can do stuff so I’m not going to complain.

    But I’d also say that using/being good at GIMP is solidly not “normal” lol. And being on Lemmy is even less normal, so here we are.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    I've been using GIMP for years and have become use to it. However, the interface still needs to be redesigned.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Wellllll that's exactly what they're looking for testers for right now

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    The UX changes in the release notes are welcome, but in the grand scheme, pretty minor. I actually find it much better than it was a decade ago, but still prefer Krita's UI by a significant margin.

    Gimp would really benefit from a total UI overhaul, honestly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (12 children)

    Change the name. 😄 Edit: Imp is right there. If you miss 3 syllables of GNU Imp, try Photobash. Make it obvious.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (11 children)

    App is great, name is terrible but the devs like it and don't want to entertain the idea of renaming.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (10 children)

    Perhaps if people keep suggesting a rename, it'll happen eventually. It is a shame that it has the name it has.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (9 children)

    Yeah, how do they expect people to talk about it in professional contexts?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    Usually they do it without being either a bunch of children or prissy pearlclutchers about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    It's not about being childish, prissy, or clutching pearls. It's about how in a professional setting, image and reputation matters. And if the name of the software you use might damage either of those in the eyes of others, it can be risky to say you use it.

    I've heard stories from people who say they've been to conferences or networking events where someone seemed interested in their work, and asked what they used. When they tell them Gimp, the person walks away and never contacts them.

    If you're a freelancer especially, losing potential clients and contracts over the name of your software is a serious issue that many people can't afford to ignore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago* (4 children)

    Maybe it is because GIMP has a reputation of being lesser than the professional software, or they think the artist is being cheap for not using commercial options.

    One weird thing about the name for me is that the lanyard or boondoggle string that kids do at camp is named gimp in some places and no one around here knows that it is a slur in other places.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)

    If someone presents work that a person is impressed with, it shouldn't matter to that person if the software they used is perceived as inferior.

    Also, I think it's more likely that a person simply hasn't heard of GIMP, rather than having heard that it has a reputation for anything.

    that the lanyard or boondoggle string is named gimp in some places

    I had no clue, I've never heard of that. What region is this in?

    and no one around here knows that it is a slur in other places.

    It's not just a slur though. That's what I understood it as for a long time, but then I found out that it's also a thing in the kink/bondage community. Apparently it's what they call a dude wearing leather straps on his torso and a leather face mask that covers his eyes and sometimes mouth. I think it's a submissive role? I don't know much about it though.

    But yeah so I can see how saying that in a professional setting could be off-putting to some colleagues...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Maybe it shouldn't matter, but it absolutely does. People are always looking for signals of class and status.

    I just learned a new name for it, and it's origins:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scoubidou

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    all of the download links are outdated

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Is this the year I finally learn how to use GIMP?

    A big part of my work is testing software, especially UI, and making Devs ragecry.

  • source
  • [–] -3 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Do they want someone to test a new name? I'm tired of waiting.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Professional Image Manipulation Program

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 2 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    That's exactly what changed 😩 Do you read?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago

    Not by anywhere near enough. Come on guy. If GIMP actually released a revolutionary UI/UX revamp you'd be reading about it on every birdcage-liner tech news site in existence. Early rants about GIMP UX are old enough to be done with college.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -5 points 2 months ago

    love how the post is trying to speak to me like some kind of ww2 propaganda poster, then tells me to test like i work for them. this tone is def gonna make me help out...or not.

  • source