top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 78 points 2 months ago (1 child)

Sounds great! I look forward to your heavy federal investment into mass transit

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 46 points 2 months ago
  • load more comments (-2 replies)
    [–] 90 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    I bet the trick to lowering health care costs is to need health care less, too.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Adds another lane: drive less!

    Stops construction of another public transport project: Drive Less!!

    Removes solar power and electric car subsidies: DRIVE Less!

    Makes electric bikes illegal: DRIVE LESS!

    (Party of freedom, btw)

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 2 months ago

    I do hope they keep it up with the hubris cos that always goes well

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    So, back to home office, yes?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 26 points 2 months ago

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Wright

    In 2011, he founded Liberty Energy, then known as Liberty Oilfield Services.[15] As of February 2023, the company was valued at $2.8 billion, according to The Wall Street Journal.[16] As the CEO of Liberty Energy, Wright earned $5.6 million in 2023.[11]

    Despite Herculean efforts on his part, Chris Wright was ultimately unable to live up to voter expectations of delivering lower fuel prices.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 2 months ago

    Well we would, if your stupid administration hadn't cut telework for feds.

    Stupid stupid stupid.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    US government evolution of transportation ideology

    1. Walking is for the poors and the idiots
    2. Cycling is for suicidal maniacs
    3. Public transit is big government and communism and you'll get mugged
    4. Cars are driving up gas prices
    5. ???
    6. PROFIT! (for the oil companies and the rest of the ruling class)
  • source
  • [–] 20 points 2 months ago

    “Let them eat cake”

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    If Dems said that before the '24 election, to eat less food and drive less to save money, everyone would go mad lol, but this magafool says it and they cool with it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Wait until he figures out that wfh is a great way to reduce driving

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    The fact that more employers haven't jumped at WFH is so telling. It's basically equivalent to an increase in salary, an improvement in employee work life balance, and a wider recruitment pool all wrapped into one without them actually having to do anything, except maybe spend LESS money on overhead.

    It's something we could easily change to improve the lives of everyone and help the environment. I'm really disappointed we're not seeing more support for it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Its because a massive amount of our real estate economy is propped up by artificially inflated office space which would kneecap a ton of corporate and REIT profits if they were to go down to actually affordable costs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 2 months ago (9 children)

    Hope all the miserable assholes who voted for stopping electrification feel it in every part of them. I hope they have to give up on real, meaningful life dreams forever because they are now unaffordable. And I hope their houses specifically burn down in the wildfires the CO2 from their gasoline made so common.

    I am beyond done with this gasoline bullshit.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

    Gas in my region is well over $5 a gallon I don't notice because we went from 2 cars to 1, and the one is an EV.

    Meanwhile I STILL see these absolute morons buying huge gas suvs and trucks because.. They need to? Always have a bullshit excuse that's always easily debunked.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    You can just electrify on your own though, regardless of what the government wants.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago* (3 children)

    There are a lot of things people can do on their own... in a world where the median US income isn't $45,000 and responsible and capable products aren't tariffed to hell.

    Mass adoption comes with affordability which comes with support and clear, intentional direction. Consumers don't shift paradigms when they think the new paradigm won't go anywhere. We can't even get people off of X - and that costs NOTHING.

    Electrifying on your own is prohibitively expensive for most people, and the fact that those people have to be prepared to also pay an additional premium because they're fighting their own government at the same time, in a period in time where people can barely afford FOOD, is not tenable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Using energy costs more money than not using it. With the amount of people flying every day don't tell me cost is the problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 months ago*

    Great suggestion! The US has great public transit /s… wait… no…

  • source
  • [+] 15 points 2 months ago
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 15 points 2 months ago

    Right wing "solutions" to difficulties are always insincere, unreasonable nonsense like this.

    Can't pay your bills? Eat less! Can't afford medical care? Shouldn't have been unhealthy! Gas prices killing you? Drive less! Depressed and burned out? Just be happy and work harder! You think billionaires are greedy? Well what charities are you giving to!? Tired of capitalist exploitation? Stop buying stuff and go live in the woods! You love immigrants? Well then let them all live in your home!

    Victim blaming dressed up as rugged individualism. Meanwhile those actually responsible for the hardships get off scot-free.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    I drive to and from dialysis three times per week, and to the occasional medical appointment. Which of those exactly should I be skipping?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [+] -9 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    You could skip all of them if you take a bus /train/bike. This is of course if you have the option. I don't know your situation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    of course if you have the option.

    And there is the root of the problem.

    Those options are increasingly not available in American cities

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Nor are they available to disabled people. But people like @Michal@programming.dev think they have the whole world figured out because they have the privilege to do so.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    In some ways, it was worse - when I lived in the same city as the dialysis place, before I was driving again, I took paratransit. Although it's a "shared ride" and sometimes I'd actually have a fellow passenger, most of the time it was just me in the van. heh.

    (Although I know for a fact that during "rush hour" they would sometimes have entire groups going close enough to need a van)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    Oof. It would be hilarious to try and take the bus to the Amtrak station in the city in which I live, go up one station to the city in which the dialysis center is located, take the bus to dialysis, have my dialysis, then go back. I'm not sure I could do that in a single day. Certainly not my chair time of 6:00am. But let's see:

    Well, alright. Actually, Amtrak ticket would be $11, which is not bad. And while the ride would be 4:21am-4:20am, I wouldn't be able to get a bus until 6:00, getting to dialysis 25 minutes late.

    The first obstacle is that I would have to leave my apartment for the Amtrak station at 11:30pm the previous day, as service doesn't run in the middle of the night.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-3 replies)
    [–] 13 points 2 months ago

    Guess I’ll stop going to work….hmm…maybe I can get some of those WFH days back now that I’m limited to 1 per week?

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago

    We'll all drive less when gas is $15/gal

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago

    The trick to having less fascists in control is to eliminate fascists.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    They are also encouraging auto makers to lower gas mileage. Keep bragging how awesome oil company stocks, and dependant US allies, are thanks to Iran war.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    No new wars would have been nice.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    "Build the wall! Lock her up! Drain the swamp!"

    lol

    lmao even

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago* (3 children)

    bro they’re still waiting for Hillary to get “locked up”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Eating less will solve food prices a bit. Just not eating will solve it entirely. And sleeping outside under a bush or in a nice box solves your housing issues. With all your problems solved we'll be looking for you to work some longer hours.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago
    [–] 8 points 2 months ago

    Best way to lower energy prices is to vote out the republicans.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago

    Driving less? The hell with that. I'm not going to drive at all. I'll be saving all the gas money!

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago

    Great, so who is going to force the RTO M-F bosses to at least let us be hybrid?

  • source
  • [+] 8 points 2 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago

    Ok then the administration should push all employers to make any position that is able a work from home decision. But we all know that won't happen, got to protect those commercial real estate profits!

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I assume he doesn't think this should be paired with ramping up public transit options and bike and pedestrian friendly infrastructure

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    Now if people only had a choice to live in evil "15min cities" where distances are much shorter and feasible alternatives to driving are available and affordable, they actually could do that, without quality of life collapsing. Oh wait, having a non miserable life is no criterion for this administration, then forget that socialist 15 min nonsense, just drive less.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    I'm living in one, or at least the 15-minute part of one. Small city in southwest England. I drive about once a week, to go out to the countryside to hike and visit a pub. Everything else is done on foot or on a bicycle. Highly recommended, despite it being totally evil. My MAGA relatives fear that I'm living in some hellish dystopia and it's only a matter of weeks before I'll be shot if I try to leave the city limits. They're already spun up enough that I don't own a gun and that I get my medical treatment on the NHS (which is under stress nationally, but still works well where I live). "Death panels," y'know...

    Now, if only the locals could figure out how to make decent Mexican food, I'd be perfectly content.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago

    Says the same group that said they lowered COVID rates by not reporting them

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago

    And meanwhile, here in the UK, the average is $8.40 per US gallon at the current exchange rate.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    welp looks like I am doing the right thing

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    I don't understand why the generation that snacked on lead paint chips is allowed to be in charge of this country.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    My understanding is that paint is only very rarely stripped out of existing houses. It's normally just painted over.

    In the US, lead paint prohibitions went into place in 1978.

    So unless you've avoided being in buildings constructed prior to 1978, you have probably been in buildings with lead paint.

    That's not to say that there aren't benefits to painting over lead paint. I'm sure that it reduces the amount of leaded paint dust and such. But a chip can still contain paint from an earlier coat.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead-based_paint_in_the_United_States

    In 1971, Congress banned the use of lead-based paint in residential projects (including residential structures and environments) constructed by, or with the assistance of, the federal government.[3] The Consumer Product Safety Commission followed with implementing regulations, effective in 1978.[4] Additional regulations regarding lead abatement, testing and related issues have been issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    When my kids were little and we were moving into our new to us house, built in 1946, they also cautioned about the outside. Treat 10’ around the house as potentially contaminated from peeling exterior paint. No vegetable gardens in that dirt. No kids playing in that dirt

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    The risk of lead absorption via skin contact isn't worth even thinking about. So unless the kids were eating substantial volumes of dirt, that's absurdly over-cautious. If you keep them indoors and feed them a tuna sandwich, the mercury dose will exceed the damage done by exposure to lead in household soil, unless something well out of the ordinary is happening.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    It’s normally just painted over.

    And as long as it's encapsulated like that, it's harmless.

    I’m sure that it reduces the amount of leaded paint dust and such.

    Almost completely, yes.

    But a chip can still contain paint from an earlier coat.

    And as long as you don't eat it and you dispose of it immediately, it's not going to hurt you.

    It's good that we terminated the production of lead paint, but unless you're in substandard, ill-maintained housing, you face far greater toxic risks from other household chemicals, gas stoves, old asbestos insulation, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I don’t understand why the generation that snacked on lead paint chips is allowed to be in charge of this country.

    It's what the American voters wanted.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    The bigger lead exposure back in the day was from breathing in particulate emissions from the burning of leaded gasoline. People's lead levels correlated pretty closely with proximity and volume of nearby vehicular traffic.

    Eating paint chips was never a big contributor, unless the person was living in some crumbling, damp tenement that was seldom cleaned. It just got popularized by some bullshit Freakonomics pseudo-analysis.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    that won't work. if everyone were to stop driving or relying on gas tomorrow. the oil companies would still raise the price because they are now "losing money" due to low demand and have to raise prices to make up for the make-believe money they are "losing"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago

    No, with production then vastly too high they wound try to sell as much as possible to at least make some money before/during/after shutting down. But you are free point out where a product got obsolete/not bought and still more expensive despite high production in the past.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    MAGA, the O&G companies and Elon Musk installed Trump because they wanted us to drive less? That was their plan all along? We all believe that ...

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    Yeah you stupid pay pigs, don't you know economics!? Supply and demand! Just stop demanding the resource we spent decades making indispensable and kept artificially scarce!

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    yes, you seeee, you peasants need to stop taking your private jets on unnecessary jaunts.

  • source
  • The broken clock strikes again.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    You can pry my demand destruction from my cold hands by crashing the economy and laying me off!

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    26 comments in c/fuckcars@lemmy.world view that post
    26 comments in c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world view that post
    18 comments in c/usa@lemmy.ca view that post
    14 comments in c/usa@lemmy.ml view that post
    4 comments in c/usa@lemmy.ml view that post
    3 comments in c/usa@midwest.social view that post