all 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 11 points 1 month ago (1 child)

Sweet, so he supports WFH?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    supports WFH

    it's going to be fascinating if the epstein class reverses its position on this because it means that the cabal(s) the benefit from commercial real estate -- the ones that had enough leverage to kill wfh -- are no longer dominant and/or have divested.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    Recent droughts in California proved that won't work. We were told to cut back on water, so we did. Rates were increased to make up for lost revenue due to lower demand.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    Car centric infrastructure leaves no choice. Some basic oil demand is forced upon everyone. (if this gets bad enough, maybe biking over empty highways would be cool, but i doubt it will get that bad)

  • source
  • 115 comments in c/nottheonion@lemmy.world view that post
    26 comments in c/fuckcars@lemmy.world view that post
    26 comments in c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world view that post
    18 comments in c/usa@lemmy.ca view that post
    14 comments in c/usa@lemmy.ml view that post
    3 comments in c/usa@midwest.social view that post