I love how just...normal...Linus is. Like...humble. Content.
Like, hey, I revolutionized the world with a pet project. Nbd.
When I was a kid I worshipped Bill Gates and Steve Jobs. I'm glad I realized later that Linus and Woz are the real heroes.
I love how just...normal...Linus is. Like...humble. Content.
Like, hey, I revolutionized the world with a pet project. Nbd.
When I was a kid I worshipped Bill Gates and Steve Jobs. I'm glad I realized later that Linus and Woz are the real heroes.
Does RMS fit in the picture here? The founder of the fsf and GNU.
"Draw me like one of your French Girls, or as recently I have taken to calling them, GNU+French Girls"
Rubbing his belly is lucky.
πΆ I'm too sexy for my shirt, to sexy for my shirt, so sexy it hurts~ πΆ
That's a very German response, but is he a pasta connoisseur? Cold or warm?
i would edit: never mind i read the stallman report and i would be too old/human/alive for him
Well, he is waiting for the pigeon with the print outs of the mails.
When you refer to βthe picture hereβ Iβm not sure if you are talking about the subject of the post, or the image you attached to your comment.
Either way: no.
Isn't it a bit strange not to change your wallpaper to something different than the default Windows one?
For the Arch defaults, I find their stock wallpapers generally pleasing in a weird n-dimensional way. When I was a young microslopper, it was always whatever brought me joy from newgrounds that week.
Archβ¦ defaults?? Are you thinking of cachyOS or maybe plasmaβs defaults?
The default wallpaper is meant to be pleasing, and I guess it's meant to appeal to the average person? I've known several people that don't change their wallpapers or that use that automatic carousel thing with a different image every time you wake the device.
I usually set my wallpaper once right after install then never change it. I only see it for a few seconds right after boot anyways. If you see your wallpaper then you aren't really doing anything.
I think that there's a legit rejoinder of "Why aren't you optimizing the code to reduce compilation time, if it's such a problem?"
For something like C++, ccache, distcc, PIMPL (to reduce use of templates, which blows up C++ compilation time), precompiled headers, make code more modular to reduce the size of the compilation unit that changes when any one change happens, break stuff into libraries, etc. Look to see whether there are things like build timestamps being inserted into headers that are producing unnecessary recompilations. clang and gcc can profile compilations to identify what's chewing up time.
that xkcd comic is coming up on 20 years old. most computers didn't have multiple cores yet.
I mean, none of the optimizations I listed rely on multiple cores.
It's true that just running parallel compilation jobs on your build machine is a simple way to speed things up, no disagreement, but it's not like optimizing compilation time isn't a thing outside of that.
i was thinking more about tooling, most of that stuff didn't exist as widely as today and you couldn't really look for it when waiting for a compile either.
Well...the in-compiler time analysis I think wasn't as good then, though I recall doing my own ad-hoc profiling, logging time for each unit. But the refactoring stuff should be available.
I dunno how far back distcc goes.
checks git repository
The git log goes back to 2008, so almost 20 years, but it's also talking about release 3.0 then, so there might have been time outside a VCS or with history that didn't get imported.
Wikipedia says that ccache goes back 24 years.
In my experience, [proprietary] projects are doing well if their Makefile isn't so broken that they have to run it twice just to make sure everything actually compiles. And you want them to actually optimize it...?!
"Sure, just give me the raise I've been asking for and I'll get right on that."
"..."
"That's what I thought."
IDK man, I like knowing that Frieren is looking out for me in the background. Even if I don't see it, I appreciate that it's there.
If you see your wallpaper then you arenβt really doing anything.
I use sway these days. It's tiling, so I rarely see my desktop background anymore.
But not everyone uses a tiling system.
While I like the idea of avoiding having onscreen pixels wasted showing useless information, and I think that tiling systems do help achieve this, I avoided tiling systems for some years, as a fair bit of software still didn't play well with it (e.g. I remember default behavior with GIMP being half of the screen being the main window, half being the GIMP toolbar window). I think that we're past that phase now, but there are people who prefer stacking window systems for various reasons and don't use tiling systems.
You just gotta be careful which automatic carousel you use...
https://www.techspot.com/news/105673-official-bing-wallpaper-app-does-nasty-malware-like.html
The average tech bro doesn't have the skill to maintain a single system long enough for customizations to matter.
Maybe Linus also has that background.
But we wouldn't know since his screen is off.
I actually really love the default wallpaper in KDE Plasma. It changes with every release. I have a friend who also uses Plasma, and before each release, we always joke that the new wallpaper is our most anticipated feature because we're too lazy to change our wallpapers ourselves and simply wait for new releases to do it for us.
First time I saw that picture, win11 was new, and having it running meant you had a rather recently built PC with a TPM module. So, an additional layer of a (satirical?) hardware flex that I don't think goes well with, well, the worse Windows at the time.
I never look at the wallpaper long enough to care about changing whatever is default
I never pick a custom image for my my OS background, I never see it
Sometimes I switch it to grey or black
since i have family and cant change it to prn,i keep it at default too. Honestly though, i barely see it. Theres always some ui over it.
When I switched to Endeavor, Ganymede was the Default wallpaper and I fucking loved it so I kept it.
The next update it changed (since it was still set to default), so I dug through an rsync backup to find it and changed it back to Ganymede
looks at image with ten visible LED fans
I don't have a problem with people decorating their computers however they want. They paid for it. It's their computer. Everyone's got their own aesthetic preferences.
However, the last build I did, I was getting a little exasperated with how increasingly-hard it is to just find desktop components that don't have RGB lighting on them any more. I mean, to me, the desktop computer is a box that has a bunch of circuit boards in it. I'm generally not looking at my RAM sticks or motherboard segments, and don't have a glass window on the side to admire it (it gets dust in there, and I'd rather have a sturdier case without glass). I could do without the extra light pollution in my life. Most stuff can be disabled, but it's kind of obnoxious to be buying and figuring out how to disable hordes of little RGB LEDs.
I'd also add that where LEDs exist, they have multiplied over the decades not just in number, but also in brightness.
If I wanted to have my computer be a light show, which I don't, I'd get a DMX512 controller for it, and real lighting effects hardware.
Maybe going for rack-mount hardware is an option. It's something that I've thought about sporadically over the years, and it does have certain benefits, if you're willing to give up portability. But rack-mount builds generally command a premium due to the market being less price-sensitive, and noise is often a more of a factor, since datacenters don't care about keeping things quiet for employees.
Paraphrasing a tidbit of information from Northwest Repair, who's a guy on YouTube that does board-level repairs on computer hardware:
Apparently, reprogramming the firmware config and changing the RGB light status on a DRAM module are both done through the same SPI bus. Consequently, every time you change the RGB lighting, it has a tiny chance of accidentally bricking the stick.
So not only is RGB an additional upfront cost that consumers might not want, it could even contribute to long-term costs by reducing the lifetime of some components.
I remember years ago there was a firmware source leak (or maybe the binary was analyzed or something) for gigabyte's led controller firmware/drivers that basically just exposed the firmware programming bus to user land because that's how they did lighting updates and the kernel mode driver just passed whatever the user mode driver gave it, which could include firmware updates to other hardware IDs.
It was at this point that I stopped running a lot of those hardware control utilities (and I suspect that might also be why I barely saw any issues with the Radeon 5700 XT that was a bit infamous for "its" issues that I think might have just been incompatibilities with 3rd party "helper" utilities or shit written by companies that had gotten to the "just ship it" stage of development).
Things like Noctua fans and motherboards aimed at enterprise use cases tend to not have the shiny distractions that average tech bros want.
You probably want to stick with ATX over rack mounted stuff as an individual, just means you have to search for function-over-form brands for peripherals and the motherboard.
top 100 comments