it might be a failure to read on my part but this reads as unfixed on Debian but fixed on Arch

Edit: Oh, yeah ok, in the security repo it's fixed, why is the vulnerable version distributed to stable though?

Not only does cachy work perfectly, Debian needs so much fiddling around to get latest software versions it's a hindrance for a lot of stuff including gaming

Wouldn't the allergens be burnt off? (assuming you could even handle it before it's burnt etc)

Wouldn't that also be true for someone condemned to life in prison?

In any case, I feel like people given life, especially at 18, should be given the option of death, life sentence is way harsher than death in my eyes.

Because it wasn't php proper, it was an interpreter for PHP and Hack (their own language), and since 2019 they cut off PHP anyway

Also it's mostly because the vast majority of those "70% of websites" that use PHP are wordpress installs, and wordpress never switched to the HHVM.

There are also temporary mail services which work as inboxes

https://mail.tm/ for example. You never have to give them your email

Yup. European style social democracy is slowly being dismantled, in France & other countries. That's the root of why protests are erupting there

Of course, there’s an important group that falls outside the bounds of the study: anyone who got hooked on vaping without trying cigarettes first.

Hmm

Edit:

I checked other sources because the article is just bad

https://www.oncologyrepublic.com.au/e-cigs-linked-to-increased-lung-cancer-risk-after-quitting-real-cigarettes/6075

They have these quotes from the researchers

Taken together, these findings suggest that, while e-cigarette use after quitting smoking may attenuate lung cancer-specific benefits of cessation, the broader health benefits of quitting conventional cigarettes are not eliminated

Although e-cigarettes contain potentially carcinogenic substances, dual use may nonetheless be associated with lower cumulative exposure to toxicants than exclusive combustible cigarette smoking

So it's not quite the "wow" finding "futurism" seems to claim. It just reinforces the consensus on vapes: If it's that or smoking, then vaping is better. That's not news, that's what doctors have been saying since vapes started becoming mainstream more than a decade ago.

IMO that kind of article is extremely damaging: it convinces smokers that vaping isn't better, so they might as well keep their current habit.

Especially if the article is trash enough to warrant reading about the study specialized journals that take their job seriously to dispell the sensationalist headline. As we know people always read past the headline, and love to dig into jargon-heavy medicine journals to get a proper grasp of the underlying study.

Shame.

The bot traffic in question is indexing crawlers. Yandex is a search engine (among other things), there is nothing suggesting they're hosting LLMs to run bot accounts

Do you mean Santeria?

The issue isn't necessarily that the work could be considered derivative, but rather that the notion of copyright exists only for work authored by a human. If it's not produced by a human, then the copyright belongs to no one, and no one can license it because no one owns it.

I feel like it's one of those cases where both the interest & liability is a public issue. This is a perfect case for a public service, and not one for a "go fast and break things" & enshittification economic model

But I fear that both the US (duh) and Europe are way too neoliberal to ever consider this seriously