No, I am Spartacus. Just me.

Watashi mo Spartacus desu.

They don't care about optics? Really? The same guys who lie whenever an ICE shooting happens to immediately portray the victim as a criminal? The same guys who changed the names to the Department of War and the Gulf of America? The same guys that launch political prosecutions they know will never succeed (like the reflecting pool cases), just to sooth Trump's ego?

These clowns are void of substance. They're nothing but optics.

You need to apply more critical thinking and consider the actual motivations prosecutors are under. It does no good to just model your adversaries as infinitely powerful demons and assume they have the will and capacity to do all the evil all the time. It makes you incapable of rational thought.

There are very real downsides to a prosecutor bringing a case again and again. Downsides that actually hurt their goals.

• With each trial the evidence gets less fresh.
• With each trial the prosecutor seems to more of the public as the villain.
• With enough trials defendants can start making legal claims based on due process grounds (not double jeopardy grounds.)
• Every trial is a roll of the dice that the jury will return a full verdict of not guilty, rather than merely a hung jury.
• With each trial the popularity of the defendant increases, upping political pressure on the prosecutor.
• After enough trials, the governor will be under pressure to just grant the defendant a pardon.
• With more and more trials, the prosecutor risks completely destroying their career. They risk being seen as an incompetent clown who either can't get a conviction or is too dumb to realize when he doesn't have a case.

You can assume the prosecutor is evil if you want. But that doesn't mean you can pretend that the prosecutors still aren't mortal human beings with the same worldly pressures as anyone else. And despite Trump's verbal diarrhea, federal prosecutors have had to abandon countless cases due to lack of evidence, Trump's tantrums be damned.

Even if you assume the prosecutor is willing to do anything to get the maximum conviction possible, they still will not endlessly try defendants. Each trial makes a conviction more unlikely. Which is why charges get watered down and plea offers get more generous.

https://thelegalguide.org/how-often-can-hung-jury-lead-retrial/

I'm just describing how hung juries work and the pressures involved on both prosecution and defendant. Maybe you should think before you speak. And start by not being a pompous ass.

I'm taking about them reporting what's around. Having that kind of information you can easily track who visited specific location at specific time.

As it should.

The police cornering someone in a McDonalds and "finding" evidence behind a wall of officers with zero transparency is exactly why courts shouldn't admit such evidence.

Maybe if police didn't have a documented history and widely known legacy of false imprisonment, planting evidence, and down right corruption...

Depends how corrupt the system has become. That's why the defense wants as much broadcasting as possible; Sunlight is one hell of a disinfectant.

Fun fact, if you're white, you can easily smuggle things by just not watching the search.

The cop is watching you to know when to signal the dog to alert.

And this frame up/parallel construction was so inept it makes me believe for a split second they are not adequately competenr manage to send those signals.

Can you back this up or is it just a trust me bro?

Hmm

Oh, that's a nice headlock sir, oh, ah yes, I see that you know your judo well.