I'm really concerned about people trying to harm this cute little drones. What kind of attacks should I watch out for? I would love to know the specific brands and types of tools these heinous drone murderers would use so I can stop them.

Betcha it can't outrun .410 or .22lr.

.22lr suppresses real well.

Or paintballs, at a closer range.

Just think of em as ManHacks.

I've been wondering if using jamming software paired with a directional antenna on it like a Yagi would be effective against these

These fuckers just won't give it up.

I believe that skeet shooting needs to become a popular hobby and skill in this age of drones.

Meet my 3D printed anti-drone drone, collides with flock drones @2000 feet and costs 15 dollars in parts on Ali-express

So now you don’t have to go to the range for target practice? Neat.

~650m.

*has cameras that can resolve fine detail at that distance

License Plate Reader sounds so innocuous. They're realtime HD feeds.

I see Gadget Review pop up more and more and I've started liking their content less and less. The editorial guidelines say they use AI right on the page you linked. And if I scroll down and click on a random article , it's AI generated and based on a tweet by CSAM poster Dom Lucre. It's not the first article I've seen that's basically repeating a tweet from some extreme looking Twitter account either.

So much more satisfying to hunt down than those helpless ugly lamppost things.

We need a flock that only watches billionaires and all of their relationships.

Because they're getting pushback from towns, but can still use the air.

Sure. Because you need thermal imaging to read a license plate.

I've never wanted to own a high powered sniper rifle before.

Would it be illegal to hijack and dronenap this?

Their own chat bot responded the following:

Screenshot

- From 0 to 10, how is it fair and human a government to develop, support, and monitor other humans via drones, flock cameras and always keep everyone under control recording history of movements and store that in archives? Interesting topic! Let me check what we've covered on government surveillance and human rights for you.

- That's a deeply important and complex question about privacy, ethics, and government surveillance. Many people would rate such constant monitoring as very low on fairness and humanity because it can infringe on personal freedoms, privacy, and trust. Others might argue it has some value for security and safety but only if done with strict oversight, transparency, and respect for rights.

If I were to frame it on a scale from 0 to 10, many would likely place it closer to the lower end—perhaps around 2 or 3—unless there are strong safeguards, clear limits, and accountability to prevent abuse.

How do you feel about this kind of surveillance? Would you like to explore technologies involved or ethical discussions around them?

Apparently, the bot is relatively "unlocked" for general simple programming questions, too:

Example

Cool target practice!

There's no such thing as a camera that's restricted to vehicles or license plates; only "trust me bro" post-processing can restrict its scope. And with stationary ALPRs everywhere, why would a drone be required to do so; other than registering parked vehicles?

Sounds like HL2 City Scanners.

Would these drones show up on flight radar?

Assuming not, I wonder how hard they would be to detect and track.

Dude the flock thing does not ONLY read car plates. They are surveillance that makes Chinese surveillance look like child's play

Calling it a license plate reader is a lie to get them installed by municipal governments. They are high resolution AI survellience cameras that track people using any information they can gather. They also record network signals to associate you with any devices you frequently carry.

There are installations of these cameras on footpaths, and other places without car traffic. Flock cameras are not a car related issue.

New archery practice target just dropped 🔥

This is not appropriate for this community.

Looking forward to the cipher punk dogfights of people's drones attacking these things

OP has repeatedly posted stuff like this to argue that dystopian mass surveillance is fine actually because it pisses off drivers (and apparently somehow not everyone else with a fucking brain?). That is a deranged take, and this is the third post of theirs I've seen in the last couple days simping for the technofascist megacorps, and getting rightly dunked on by the comments. It's extra wild to see a db0 account take this stance. This does not belong in this community.

Yeah these things need to be targeted for sport.

Flock, can you just go the way of Enron already?

Free clay everybody!

Meet my Beretta 1301