Tbf i'll gladly let the .ml ppl criticise the capitalists and liberals, that's something we can agree on
amazingtopballs
A line from Bakersfield to Barstow (both in California) would seem handy.
Newton to Oklahoma City and then Hastings as well!
La Junta to Denver also (both in Colorado), so if a line has issues, it's possible to travel by another.
Marxism-Leninism*
Might wanna spruce up on anarchist and council communism, those are anti-authoritarian.
I used to be a social democrat as well, gradually drifted towards those though. If you've any questions, feel free to ask!
Polcomp communities often lean alt-right, wouldn't count those.
Antarchy, never heard of that one.
Isn't there AnarWiki? That one's pretty good.
Also, aside from what other commenters pointed out: communism ≠ marxism-leninism
anarchist & council communism also exist!
Are there no limits to presidential vetoes?
In a nutshell, once a simple majority (>50%) of US states enact it, they will have all electoral votes for presidential elections awarded to whichever candidate gains most votes. That means the Electoral College's effects (faithless electors, not aligning with popular votes, etc.) will be sidelined.
Therefore, rather than an oligarchy (the Electoral College), it is the public that decides the election.
Situations like Bush winning or Hillary losing, would then no longer occur, because both of these won only due to the electoral college.
i don't get the joke(?), could you explain?
That's the part that confuses me. Mullvad has distanced itself from his stance. As for the party..:
My analysis
The party he supports has been claimed to be Marxist, and elements of that can be seen in it favouring a 30-hour workweek, strong secularism, making public transit free of charge, as well expanding social housing.
However, it (falsely) aligns workers with the business class, thus showing elements of favouring the bourgeoise rather than the proletariat; it also is nationalist in character, rather than internationalist, and wishes to deport fellow labourers. Moreover, it disfavours green energy and is thus a tool of the global capitalist coal and petrol companies. It also opposes liberating the worker from gender-based negative discrimination, because it wants to abolish quotas.
Since their policies don't support inherent change of power structures, nor liberate the worker from discrimination, I would label them as revisionist marxists due to their alliance with the oligarchs.
Proton on the other hand, has confirmed donations that tend to be for organisations which I'd label as broadly progressive, but generally towards the centre-left. However, their CEO is obsessed by AI and has supported a statement of Trump. So it's really crazy.
I've known someone who uses both Proton's VPN and the Mullvad one. From what I saw when I tested theirs, the Proton one manages to get through and works with frontends, whereas Mullvad doesn't always, but it's got more finetuning.