I've been using KeePassXC with Syncthing for years and it's been great as a password manager for myself. But I don't need to share those credentials with anyone.
post
Iβm tired
Bitwarden is pivoting towards the same enshittification path as everything else, so thatβs not gonna be a good long term for a password manager. They hired a new ceo whose only noteworthy experience is prepping companies for mergers and acquisitions, and briefly removed messaging on their website about always having a free tier which they reinstated after backlash. All signs point to a sinking ship, imo.
I donβt have the answer for what to use instead since Iβm still a paid subscriber with them, but Iβm looking around. Probably keepassxc but I donβt know enough to host and sync my own.
KeepassDX on android. Any keepass .kdbx file opener on every OS. .kdbx file saved on a local network shared folder on an always on raspberry pi. Access the folder on all devices, open the file with keepass app.
No sync, no extra sync software, no dangling copies, changes are immediate, decryption happens on device not over the network. Step up to network share over sftp. Tailscale tunnel to access when away from home.
Vaultwarden is a great alternative.
However, Vaultwarden only implements the webvault, the client apps are still only supplied by Bitwarden, which they could make incompatible with Vaultwarden at some point.
the client apps are still only supplied by Bitwarden
Not true. You could also use Keyguard.
Which is a proprietary crap.
Their github page is public and you can review the code if you want to. What are you talking about?
I'm talking about the license. It is proprietary.
What is it exactly that you want to do but can't? Anyone can audit the code, you could see if they were doing something sketchy. Sounds lile you just want to complain.
Open Source is not just about the source code availability. Keyguard is proprietary and I try to avoid proprietary software.
So no real reason then. Gotcha.
Just because someone's constraints don't apply to you doesn't mean they aren't "real", maybe try to not be so dismissive of other people's needs?
We're here discussing the possibility that BW enshittifies, and you suggest an alternative that has everything ready from its day1 to enshittify. Just saying.
Uhm, no? I was talking about BW only as a client for Vaultwarden and mentioned thar Keyguard is an alternative client. There's nothing "enshitified" about it. What exactly is the issue about it only being source available?
I didn't write it was enshittified. I'm saying it bears just as much risk of enshittification as BW clients, even worse here since you can't fork it.
Literally anything can "enshittify". A project being open source does not ensure that won't happen.
you canβt fork it.
Well, technically you can, there's nothing stopping you. There are 121 forks already. Not sure you can distribute it though.
Regardless of all of this, it's just like any app or service. You can use it while it meets your needs and drop it when it doesn't. In this particular case, you can at least see the source code and actually make sure that there's nothing bad in there.
Source available does not mean the same thing as Open Source.
Re-read my comment. Did I say "open source"? Also, I reiterate my question, what does it being source available entail for you? Is there anything more insecure? Is there something you can't do? This sounds more like a pet peeve than an actual problem.
Calm down random internet stranger. Adding clarification does not mean I accused you of saying anything you didn't. Relax.
the community already made a custom server that's compatible with Bitwarden, I imagine if Bitwarden cut them off then they could make a custom client for it as well.
in fact I believe there are community made Bitwarden apps already for Linux desktops, although I never tried them because I just use the browser extension.
Indeed, and I do not like that I have to have another repository just for the bitwarden app.
I am not really worried though. If they completely fuck up, a fork of the app will be a matter of seconds.
AFAIK the concept behind keepassxc is that it's an encrypted .kdbx file that you sync yourself among your devices by any means you can. There are official apps for Windows/Linux/Mac, browser extensions for Firefox/Chrome/Chromium/Vivaldi, there's integration with ssh-agent, and 3rd-party apps for Android and iOS.
I don't think Keepass does syncing. I just leave the database in my Nextcloud sync folder on my desktop, and I can always pull the latest version to my phone. It'd be a bit more annoying if I routinely added new entries from my phone since Android won't let the NC app maintain bidirectional sync, but I pretty much always do it from my desktop, so the workflow is fine for me personally. If you do it on your phone, you can upload the changed version, but I think you'd have to do it manually, so not a great flow, but if it's a rarity, not too big a deal to me.
write a bash script that rsyncs your keepass database to your other devices and run it once in a while. i have seen way too many online password vaults get hacked to ever bother with them.
Bitwarden is pivoting towards the same enshittification path as everything else
Yeah... I've noticed as well.... also interested in a good alternative.
Yah for now keeping Proton Pass only for that reason. And still on Gmail because I'd tried thrice migrating all to Proton but something always annoyed me.
this is exhausting
Don't worry, it'll keep going. There are so few exceptions to multi-product companies becoming shit in the long term
It is. I just made the switch last year and spent forever making hide-my-e-mail adresses for every service , web page and online store I had subscribed to. My Proton subscription just renewed so I guess Iβll wait another 11 months to see how this pans out before I make a decision.
I started with those, but then thankfully quickly realized itβs a great form of vendor lock.
Itβll still be a pain to migrate, but at least not AS bad as it could have been.
Hide-my-emails keep working after you leave proton if you have your own domain. I left proton last year and the alias I created there still point to my email address. But you have to have it point to a custom domain email address
Obsidian is proprietary. It can go fuck itself.
I don't know if I'd still suggest Bitwarden with the dual-licensing drama from not too long ago and the new CEO.
I wouldn't trust Bitwarden anymore. I don't believe they've done anything bad just yet, but they recently sold out to a private equity firm and quite literally removed "transparency" from their company values. KeePassXC is your friend.
But they replaced transparency with "trust" so surely we can trust them right? /s
I don't trust bitwarden. This was very annoying: https://community.bitwarden.com/t/copying-values-brings-up-remote-desktop-window/100351/20
They claimed copying on Linux was only possible via screensharing despite literally every other app being able to copy text without that. The thread ends with "it's linux's fault bro" and yet the issue seems to have been fixed since then.
Ahh too bad then I'll switch to Keepass yeah
I'm not sure if you are aware, but there is a reason why it is explicitly xc instead of just keepass. Xc is the Foss one & keepass is a corporate hell hole
There's also ChiPass if you want no vibe code: https://codeberg.org/ChiPass/ChiPass
quite literally removed βtransparencyβ from their company values
No they didnt. Why do people keep making up this bullshit?
"Bitwarden company values spell the word βGRIT,β and stand for:
- Gratitude
- Responsibility
- Innovation
- Trust"
It used to say Inclusion and Transparency, before they sold out.
IVPN is a well-established private VPN provider, with a strong track record.
Windscribe is also of note, being part of the cross-promotional circle of agreements with other established and trusted services such as Tuta, and Addy.io
Obscura is also worth a look for the especially privacy minded approach they take to running a VPN, essentially severing the entry and exit points of your network traffic across providers so that even if Obscura or their partners were to fail a user's privacy, there wouldn't be anything lost.
Mullvad is also a longstanding and respected VPN but I believe there's been pretty severe controversy around them recently, and that should be looked into before considering them. They were essentially the gold-standard up until recently.
All of these providers have a variety of anonymous payment methods, to varying degrees of convinience and anonimity.
IVPN speeds are pretty bad IME, check if it works for you before committing to it
wow thanks for all those details!!
Felt like giving a little list off the top of my head instead of just going 'use what I use!'
If you want any assistance, I'm always open to help out :)
How is IVPN when it comes to p2p file sharing?
Ivpn doesn't support port forwarding so it probably won't work well for filesharing. Private internet access has support for it, although I'm not thrilled with its jurisdiction atm, but that being said they have been subpoenaed before & were unable to produce logs so they probably aren't bsing their no log policy.
Have you tried airvpn? I haven't yet, but I've seen it recommended and it supports port forwarding.
Private Internet Access was acquired by some group which has snatched up a lot of VPN services, I find it all quite shady and would hazard against trusting them.
Pia is owned by kape technologies, a company founded by former Israeli intelligence officers that buys up VPNs.
I tend to recommend airvpn for cheap port forwarding but bear in mind you may recognize the need for a separate normal service because of airs unique position in the marketplace.
Couldn't tell you, sorry. They don't support port forwarding but I'm not too sure on how that'd effect, say, torrenting.
Xeovo is the only VPN provider that has posted explicit anti-fascist statements, if that's what you're looking for. Even IVPN defended Mullvad.
I've known someone who uses both Proton's VPN and the Mullvad one. From what I saw when I tested theirs, the Proton one manages to get through and works with frontends, whereas Mullvad doesn't always, but it's got more finetuning.
Mullvad's co-founder funds the Swedish alt-right
That's the part that confuses me. Mullvad has distanced itself from his stance. As for the party..:
My analysis
The party he supports has been claimed to be Marxist, and elements of that can be seen in it favouring a 30-hour workweek, strong secularism, making public transit free of charge, as well expanding social housing.
However, it (falsely) aligns workers with the business class, thus showing elements of favouring the bourgeoise rather than the proletariat; it also is nationalist in character, rather than internationalist, and wishes to deport fellow labourers. Moreover, it disfavours green energy and is thus a tool of the global capitalist coal and petrol companies. It also opposes liberating the worker from gender-based negative discrimination, because it wants to abolish quotas.
Since their policies don't support inherent change of power structures, nor liberate the worker from discrimination, I would label them as revisionist marxists due to their alliance with the oligarchs.
Proton on the other hand, has confirmed donations that tend to be for organisations which I'd label as broadly progressive, but generally towards the centre-left. However, their CEO is obsessed by AI and has supported a statement of Trump. So it's really crazy.
Bitwarden's gone private equity. I'd hold off on switching to them; maybe try to live with KeePass if you're not on a family plan.
I switched over to vaultwarden. I am stuck on an iPhone for the time being and I don't care for all the Keepass ios apps.
Completely valid. I myself am still on Bitwarden, waiting for the other shoe to drop, but my family is already entrenched in it.
I think if I have to move them again, I might seriously consider forking keepass, adding the features I use in bitwarden.
I do not look forward to dealing with IOS tho.
Vaultwarden is completely Bitwarden-compatible. You can export all data from Bitwarden server/service, import it into Vaultwarden server, and your family will not notice the change at all, except you'll ask them to change address in their already installed Bitwarden app.
They don't need to change anything else. To them, it will still be the same Bitwarden.
and your family will not notice the change at all
Here lie dragons: for as long as the private equity firm that owns Bitwarden chooses to let us use their clients.
There are non-Bitwarden Android clients around, but they lack Chrome extensions and IOS.
True, this is a possibility. But, in years of Vaultwarden's existence, this never happened.
100% but for years of Vaultwarden's existence, they haven't been owned by private equity.
Just keep your eyes open and know that it could come for us. I've stopped counting on how many services went private->enshitify bad enough for me to bail.
Fair enough. In case we do need to move, here's a quick tip: KeepassXC and many other password managers are able to read Bitwarden export files, so you can seamlessly move credentials there, should the need arise.
Also, Vaultwarden has a web interface, which can do as a temporary or full substitute. I used it for a while, it's totally doable.
I would switch to KeePass if its sync method was more sane than "big binary file + Syncthing", it seems like all the password manager options kindof suck in some way
aughhh dealing with syncthing and keepass was a painnnnnn. it was way too easy for things to desync. i just switched to my own vaultwarden instance and called it a day.
Yeah, there are a bunch of ways to tackle that. Chunk-Based Content-Addressable Block Storage (that weird thing where they put a folder of 0-A the folders under that with hex-based naming and small chunks of data wouldn't be horrible keeping update sizes managable. The real problem there is dealing with Syncthing conflict files. The monobinary is either new or old. Maybe a local-only CBC with deltas delivered by syncthing so they can overwrite each other and a rollback/history option.
P2P anything is complicated. Something as damning and imporant as password management makes it so much worse.
there's still vaultwarden. i just self-host that and use the official bitwarden clients (android app + firefox extension). even if bitwarden itself shits the bed and takes their clients down with it, i don't doubt there will be alternatives up and running relatively quick.

top 98 comments