No, you are!
Thanks! Replaced.
Previously crossposted as found.
This is not true. Mainstream feminism is not aimed at domination over men, but it may naturally be more focused on women's rights issues.
This is why this place exists - to coordinate people fighting for equality from both sides. There are undoubtedly many issues men face that women don't, and this is part of what we aim to solve.
Fighting for better future for men doesn't mean standing against feminism.
Oh. Is there anyone who can have you for a day or two as you sort these things out? It helps to have a clear head and a little backup.
I'm sure this will get solved better than you think, and I'll be glad to hear back how it goes for you.
Same to you!
Our goals are completely shared here: we both want for every person to get the support they need, and foster the community in which people are supportive of each other, regardless of gender and other conditions.
The only difference is approach: while you go straight on promoting the end goal, I try to clear up what stops people from embracing it. Both approaches are needed at the same time, and both are valid.
Loneliness, let alone "male loneliness epidemic" was never even mentioned anywhere in the post or the pic. But yes, everyone can get lonely, and our best chance to combat it is to have healthy communities, not stripe anyone of their autonomy.
Going immediately defensive over what wasn't even mentioned is, generally, antithetical to building a healthy community, though. Thereby, further lashes like this may result in a ban by the Rule 2. I hope this message finds you well.
Feminism is good, but I do not think it's right to fight for men's rights under this banner. It's simply too easy to hijack by reminding that feminism is, in principle, about women's rights (hence the name), and completely lose the part about men from the conversation. This happened before, and it will happen again.
It's very unfortunate that "men's rights activism" was also hijacked by patriarchal assholes who have nothing in common with actual men's rights. But masculism as a whole can be remedied, and can complement feminism organically as part of a broader antisexism movement.
So, ideally, we should agree on feminism being a movement for equality with focus on women's issues, masculism is the same but focusing on specific issues of men, and both uniting to bash patriarchals and fight for a better, more equal and just future.
NSFW, TMI
…I mean, all I can offer is my body, and I doubt you’d want that :P…
Girlie, you have a great man and growing following on the naughty side of the Fediverse. You sure about that? 😏
Also, having a person to talk to can be very important, and it's cool of you to share this 😊
You should really place a /j somewhere before someone thinks they're screwed
- People had a choice between two evils, and practically no way to elect anything else. Democrats rapidly deteriorated the quality of life of Americans and funded cruel genocidal wars, which led many to protest vote Republican.
- After Trump actually won for the second term, many regrets were voiced about this protest vote. Ultimately, this led to what we have now: complete domination of Democrats in Congress. People really, really despise what's happening, but can't do much else until the next presidential election turn.
- Trump won his first presidency through representative vote; popular vote (i.e. votes of the actual voters) was on the side of Hillary Clinton. Basically, in every actual democracy Hillary would win that election, but the quirks of US electoral system decided otherwise.
So, in aggregate, Trump won his first presidency against the will of the people, and his second one in large part due to protest vote against war and genocide. Protest vote backfired, and people try to at least recover some of the damage while thinking of new ways to make at least one party give a single damn about what population wants.
Besides, this fails to mention that people are different, and lumping them over their citizenship is extremely counterproductive. If anything, it serves the rest to feel superior while doing nothing. At any given time, about half of US population wants global cooperation, social reforms, and common good. They are not your enemies in any way, shape or form - they're only unfortunate to be there in this day and age.
Same goes for other corners of the world, be it Russia, Israel, Iran, China, or anything else. Everywhere, there's plenty of people who fight back, who do not agree with whatever their government is doing. They are not your enemies. In fact, these are often the very people you interact with, and shoving blame in their face is hypocritical, counterproductive, and plain rude.
I see!
