all 78 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 105 points 4 months ago* (5 children)

It won’t fail if implemented in the US. The US is convinced that bettering its people is libtard stupidity.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 4 months ago

    There's also the matter of how every institution here exists to extract wealth profitably. It's not just libtarded to invest in citizens at a less than explosive profit return, it also undermines the system of exploitation that needs people dumb and cheap to hire.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    It worked in the US for many years...quietly. Ask Boomers, Gen-X, and probably Millenials how much their University of Puerto Rico education cost them, and you'll mostly get a big fat $0. For a long time, UPR price per credit was closely tied to federal Pell grants. The grant check, which applied a vast majority of students, would cover credits and books most of the time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    It requires two things America doesn't want to do.

    Taxing the rich and nationalizing an industry.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (3 children)

    nationalizing an industry.

    Not even. Every state has a public university system. Many of which used to be free. It’s as simple as investing enough that they be free to state residents again.

    Let the private universities continue as they want. Some people will use them but they’ll need to compete against free

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (2 children)

    It's not, because public universities are price gouging.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    It would absolutely work.

    Forcing people into crippling debt, however, helps create the indentured servitude class. The in debt students and future workers are less likely to waste time on stupid things like protesting or revolt.

    Educational debt is one of the prongs of system rigging and the elites in America prefer it this way.
    Elite owned media keeps pumping out the bs of affordability and scaring people with trans nonsense and the cycle keeps on going.

    If Americans could wake the f up it could change quickly, but history has shown that they won’t.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    It also helps push people away from furthering their education. If its just another bill to pay, why bother when you can get just as good a job without it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    I would love so much to go to college, but yeah, at this point in my life it becomes a business question, rather than about personal betterment. Everything is a desperate "Return on Investment" calculation anymore.

    Yeah, it definitely pushed me away. I can do art and gamedev without a degree (but haven't made it yet for a plethora of reasons), but you need a bachelor's if you want any hope of escaping the country. Drat! Cornered.

    I teach myself stuff all the time, but it doesn't come with a paper that says I put myself deep in debt to do it, so, I'm automatically disqualified for "good" jobs. :(

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    America tried to make college free by guaranteeing free grant money for college. The colleges then suddenly needed to up the tuition fees setting us back to square one.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 4 months ago

    Someone asked why we don't have bullet trains and I think my answer there is equally applicable here:

    Rampant corruption redirects almost all federal resources to contractors and corporations.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    American who moved to Denmark (though I haven't yet studied here at university, just language schools).

    It would work in the US just fine, except that it wouldn't funnel money from 18 year old kids taking out loans to rich people's pockets.

    My overall tax burden is only a little higher (3.5-4%) than it was in the US. And for that I get healthcare, university, significantly better working conditions and QoL all around, and a society I'm proud of instead of ashamed of.

    Big recommend, though I don't consider the language easy

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    My overall tax burden is only a little higher (3.5-4%) than it was in the US.

    Does that also take into consideration not having to pay insurance premiums for basic healthcare?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 24 points 4 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

    you're wrong. only 35% of adults over 25 have a bachelors degree or higher.

    50% is if you include 'some college' which means people who went but have no degree, or have an associates or other trade school/post-secondary level education.

    no idea where you are getting 60% from, unless you're talking about certain states where most of the educated folks live.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    People are talking about taxes, but there is one part that is overlooked in how the decisions were being made.

    College in the USA used to be much cheaper. The federal government gave state governments land to sell in order to fund "land grant colleges", basically the top of most states' public education system. There was massive funding into these colleges, which generally meant that private colleges needed to be somewhat competitive with poorer students. Government funding continued through the middle of the twentieth century with the GI Bill and a mix of federal and state aid to keep tuition low.

    However, starting in the 1990's, three things started happening. First, millennials were getting ready to go to college in a wave that colleges had never seen, requiring the building of new facilities. Second, school rankings were becoming more important, so colleges started chasing clout and that chase cost money. Third, financial aid started to incorporate student loans as a way for kids to pay for college.

    So, tuition costs soared as colleges were spending massive amounts of money on new buildings and ways to increase prestige while aid programs shifted to loans. In a lot of cases, states even pulled back funding as student loans could fill the void. Students still came as it was seen that a college education was required to have a good middle class life in the future.

    Now that the millennial wave has crested, colleges are dealing with massively falling student numbers, which is a major problem given it became a significant revenue source.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago*

    Yep, great comment.

    And right now a lot of schools are shutting down because they can't enroll enough students and they charge way too much to attend. Like 12 schools in my state have closed in the past 2 years. These are typically cheaper schools too, but students don't want to go to cheap schools, so they don't apply.

    Basically, it's a story of gluttony and greed.

    The pricing dynamics of college education is also obscured. Basically, the reason they all charge so much is because they don't want to look 'cheap'. So if one place hikes tuition, they ALL have to do it, because they don't want to seem 'cheap' compared to a competitor. Nobody wants to go to the 'cheap' school.

    There are great studies about how many colleges, when they increased their sticker prices, saw more students apply to go there. Because if you apply between a uni that charges 50K an one that charge 100K, the 100K one MUST be better. right? This means all the cheaper universities inflated their prices to look competitive with the more expensive ones.

    BUT the real cost that students pay at both places is pretty much the same.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    this misses what happened to public colleges, like the land grant colleges you mention. at the height of counterculture, campuses exposed everyone to powerful ideas that made them do all kinds of organizing against the establishment. for example in 1970 the Ohio National Guard was called onto Kent State University and fired over sixty rounds into anti-war protestors, killing four. Ronald Reagan became California Governor, defunded universities, and introduced tuition to stop this onset of class consciousness; in his words, to bar “undesirables” from college. then in 1975, NYC went almost bankrupt, and regretfully adopted the same measures upon the City University system in a ton of cuts to tackle $14 billion and growing in debt. thus the same policies spread across the rest of the US. a similar reason is why the “leftist” party in Britain managed to landslide against 20 years of Conservative rule by promising to introduce tuition.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago

    I'll tell you what's at the bottom of it. If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you.

    Lyndon B. Johnson

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago

    That line of thinking is the backbone of us propaganda.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    A ton of reasons. Among them: capitalist/military extremism. Private sector profits and """defense""" are treated as holy, so the profits of the education sector and of weapons manufacturers need to be protected. The completely out of control military expenditure is one large reason why Americans can't have many nice things that other countries have (education, healthcare, etc.) as it sucks so much of the national budget.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    You don't understand American politics until you understand American racism.

    Plenty of Americans would rather die of a treatable disease than have one penny of their hard-earned taxes go to a black person's healthcare.

    The American experiment with socialism died the instant it could no longer legally exclude black peopde.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    Yes, there's a lot of that too, but I don't think that the American experiment with socialism died because of that or that it's even dead.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    I find that things that don't make sense in American history and politics suddenly become perfectly rational when you consider racism.

    And if you look at conservative attacks on social welfare policy, it is often and most effectively done simply be associating welfare with "undeserving" black people. Reagan's cadillac "welfare queen" was racially coded, as was the "young bucks" eating steaks with food stamps (steak is a food, go figure).

    This is the Southern Strategy, how the Republican Party flipped confederate slave states from D to R after the passage of civil rights.

    If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you. ― Lyndon B. Johnson

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago

    Because conservatives/regressives who elect felons, rapists, and pedophiles said so.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    For any question about "why is this extra bad in the United States?", racism is probably a big factor. There's a book "Dying of Whiteness" that's pretty horrifying. Some people would literally rather suffer and die personally than let black people have nice things.

    It's not the only factor, but it's a big one.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    Pick an issue in the US and it's probably because of xenophobia of some flavor (racism, bigotry, etc) or money. Often both.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    For the epstein class it's only ever about money - they make up the racism/bigotry to get poor people to support their grift.

    Not to say they aren't racist/bigoted, but to them, it's just a tool to get the money.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 31 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Americans are selfish assholes, it is just a fact. I have lived here almost 50 years and that's all there is to it

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 child)

    Why is American culture so selfish, though? Humans are just animals and are easily influenced. "Culture" is a continuously moving target. What are the sources that have had the most influence on Americas population over the last 20-80 years?

    As a foreigner who was heavily influenced by American culture up until getting cable news in my room and watching fox news as a teenager in 2001, the year I was studying modern history and its propaganda, I would argue the root cause is Americas business and political leadership. Millions of people have expected mask-off fascism from America far longer than Trump's been relevant. Why did those people come to that conclusion long ago?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    Yeah I'm not saying it's all their fault either, and I am just as much of a product of that culture it's inescapable. I would agree with you there, but from the start we have always loved a story about someone coming from nothing, it's a story we have been telling ourselves over and over in this country, and while it happens it requires a great deal of support around you and that is never mentioned by anyone. It has gone way downhill since Reagan I would say, the 80s was just a supercharged consumerism culture here, which pits people against each other because when you have your neighbors competing against each other over who has the biggest house or boat or nicest car or whatever, they are spending spending spending. Lifestyles of the rich and famous, Cribs, celebrity worship, all that junk is to blame too

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    Does everyone get it or free for those who test into the institutions. do others get like community college equivalent?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    They require passing grades in relevant high school level subjects, like engineering might require you to pass mathematics, physics and English on a high level.

    Some of the more sought after ones have thresholds for your average grade, but if you qualify you should always be able to get in somewhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (2 children)

    Everyone.

    As said, some studies can’t take everyone so if there’s a higher demand then the requirements to get in is higher (think GPA)

    But you can apply to multiple schools

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    ok so there is enough capacity to take in everyone. is it a one time thing or can people mid career retool or refreshen. honestly univeristy should be based on merit and we should have varied enough programs that most everybody can find something that fits them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    What makes you think it would fail? In all likelihood, it would probably be very successful if properly supported.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    Its a matter of culture and society

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago

    It would not work because an educated populace is harder to control. Uneducated people will be easily manipulated to fight amongst themselves while the oligarchs do whatever they want

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Public universities were in many cases free following WW2. But the generation made use of that, then pulled the ladders up in typical “I got mine. Fuck everybody else,” boomer fashion.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    Yup, and then it became "I was able to work a summer job and pay for my entire tuition, why are you whining you lazy young kid", ignoring the fact that you literally can't do that anymore.

    I am ineligible for any federal or state grants. I'm an adult who lives alone, works full time, and pays all my own bills. I had to drop out of college because I couldn't afford the 20k a year tuition. The government told me that based off my income I should be able to afford to pay $39k worth of tuition and fees on my own, at the time I was making about $44k a year in total pay with OT. I guess I can just go live in a fucking box and eat out of the garbage while I finish my degree.

    Meanwhile my old boss, who is married with a kid, dual income making a 6 figure salary and owns a really nice house, gets over 10k a semester in grants to attend 2 college classes a semester, because having a kid and owning a house means you can claim those expenses. I can't claim my rent as a living expense on the FASFA, therefore the government assumes I get free housing somehow.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago* (2 children)

    One problem seems to be that Americans treat education as a for-profit business. Universities must make money, text book publishers ask for horrendous amounts because they know the students have no other chance than to comply and there are probably many more places where money gets funneled away.

    Many European countries on the other hand treat education as a service to society and an investment into everyone's future. We already have a shortage of well-educated professionals so we want to reduce the number of roadblocks that smart people have to overcome to reach their full potential.

    In Germany, most universities have an administrative fee of about 100-200€ per semester that may pay for things like mandatory insurances, a students union and in the case of my old university, a psychological help service. For a couple of years, we had a 500€ per semester fee on top of that but it turned out that wasn't very popular. I think the first state to get rid of it was Baden-Württemberg when the Greens won the state election.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 child)

    In america we have 1 administrator for every 2.5 students. And we have 1 faculty for every 30 students, and half the faculty are not full time.

    It takes a lot of people to run the sports facilities, the healthcare clinics, the support services, the DEI offices, the grants admin, the labs and computer facilities, etc.

    Education is not the point of our universities. What it is is making sure each student that attends is a very happy little camper. And that's exactly what our uni system has become, sleep away camp where you fill you days with fun activities, clubs, and sports, and you only spend about 10 hours a week doing anything educational.

    Then we lament that our graduates lack basic job skills and can't read, do mathematics, or write...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    Not to mention that most colleges have basically become real estate businesses with a school attached to them. In most college towns the college itself is the largest land owner. They are able to use small government to force sales and pick up real estate at small cost and later sell them for huge revenue. The rich schools aren't using their billion dollar endowments to benefit the school employees or students any more, they're using it to buy property.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    If we didn't have a military we could do it. The world would still bitch at us for not policing the world. Either way we're bitched at, so who cares.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    The US used to have free state colleges, but only Pepperidge Farm remembers.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    False premise.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago* (5 children)

    Who says it'd fail in the US? Oh right - people who are just politically opposed to the idea just because, and therefore invent reasons why it'd allegedly fail. Same as any other remotely decent thing that demonstrably works elsewhere.

    An afterthought to this is that, while every country thinks it's special, the US thinks it's real special, and the exceptionalist mindset is probably not helping.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago* (4 children)

    good luck getting universities and the american population to give up college sports, and all the other shit that american universities do taht don't exist in europe.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (3 children)

    That would be an example of one of those invented reasons I was mentioning, yeah.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    OK, go tell the ivy league universities to give up all their sports programs. see how that goes over.

    because the rest of the usa education system follows what they do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    It wouldn't?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Does the EU have free college and access across the union?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    This is not mandated at EU level afaik. Though I found this compare page. Though I'm not sure, what these number include. For example germany is listed as free, though you pay I think between 300 and 400€ per semester. Though that includes a public transport ticket for all of germany (Deutschlandticket). And of course no housing included.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    higher education in america is fundamentally culturally different.

    like our entire culture is.

    that's why.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Because smart people don't like Trump.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Moreover, the Danes give about $1000/month to students enrolled in university. Foreningers have a work requirement (not much) to ge the same benefit, too.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    It won't work in the US because those who profit from higher education successfully used their exorbitant fees to fund lobbyists and propagandists to convince Americans it's both normal and required.

    We're far more oligarchy than democracy.

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    Mainly Danish, Swiss and European citizens are eligible to study without stressing over student debt

    Yet only 47% have a college degree. It's better than the US at 38% but then that figure is an average over the entire country. For example Poland in the EU is at 28% while DC in the US is at 65%.

    I suspect that it's a difference in presentation. In the US college is free for anyone with high grades because of scholarships. In Denmark school is free for anyone with high grades. If you don't have high grades, you aren't allowed to go to college in Denmark.

    EU schools separate kids out at an earlier age into Trade and College. Whereas the US sells the idea that everyone should try and go to college. So kids take on debt to go to college when they shouldn't have ever gone. If they had been in the EU, they would have never been presented with the idea of college- they would have been forced into trades like manufacturing and repair.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago*

    yep. people don't really want to acknowledge that in the german/danish systems, and often schools in asia, if you aren't a top student you aren't getting a higher education, it's completely barred from you.

    and a lot of the same economic issues persist... most top students come from rich families... just like in the USA.

    there is more opportunity for a poor kid to go to college for free/low cost in the USA. but they are a minority of students, and a lot of people HATE and resent them for that. especially the mediocre students from wealthy families.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago

    It's the a major motivation for people to join the military.

  • source