MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Billionaire Elon Musk likely broke Wisconsin law when he handed out $1 million checks to voters in the 2025 state Supreme Court election, a bipartisan panel has found.

The Wisconsin Elections Commission last week referred two complaints to the Brown County district attorney’s office, which can choose to bring criminal charges over violating the state law against election bribery. Prosecutors have 40 days to report back to the commission.

Musk, the founder of SpaceX and CEO of Tesla, was deeply involved in the effort to flip majority control of the highest court in battleground Wisconsin.

The tech titan and groups he supported spent at least $20 million on the candidate backed by Republicans, Brad Schimel. However, he lost by 10 percentage points to Democratic-backed candidate Susan Crawford.

A month after the lopsided loss, Musk announced that he would be spending far less on political campaigns. Spending on the election topped $100 million, making it the most expensive judicial race in U.S. history.

Prosecutors will decide if Musk should be charged over the $1 million checks

The complaints, which are confidential under state law, were brought by voters in Milwaukee and Green Bay, which is in Brown County. Musk handed out checks at a rally there just days before the election.

The Wisconsin Elections Commission, consisting of three Democrats and three Republicans, voted 5-1 in closed session on Thursday to refer the complaints to the district attorney, the commission’s spokesperson Emilee Miklas said.

Brown County District Attorney David Lasee, a Republican, did not immediately return a message seeking comment Tuesday.

The motion approved by the elections commission said it found probable cause that Musk broke Wisconsin law by making a social media post offering $1 million to people who voted in the Supreme Court election “in order to induce them to vote in that election.”

top 66 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 161 points 3 months ago* (14 children)

How about we arrest and charge that motherfucker?

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 53 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    Can't do that. It would be bad for business.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Crooks who do tyranny, specially publicly, have no reason to be allowed to continue doing business

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • That's the thing we're all fighting for thousands to pay rent and buy food. Some bastard who steals $1M literally gets someone killed, that's like 20 people getting laid off, 20 households that wont have money for medicine housing and food, but the rich asshole gets a slap on the wrist because he didn't do anything violent with his body. He just clicked a button and stole millions, but that's way more damaging to society and kills people in a way that a shoplifter would never be able to even if they shoplifted every single day.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago* (2 children)

    Unfortunately, the ones that are supposed to do that, all work with him. I mean it's so obviously clear at this point. So many things have happened in this past little while that should have been instant arrest or investigations, or you know, just plain people getting fired or removal from offices. But it's clear, they all work together.

    I guess you could say, the justice system overwhelmingly (not everyone but most) works for the executive branch now. It bows down like a little bitch and licks the executive branch boots.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    It always has worked for the executive branch. The difference is the executive branch used to pretend to be impartial and find the best person for the job, and leave them alone to do it. These days the corruption is expected, and even desired, by a large portion of the American population.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 79 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Until he gets arrested, it's meaningless.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 44 points 3 months ago

    Likely?

    It's called buying votes.

  • source
  • [–] 38 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    They're so terrified of setting the precedent of sending a rich person to prison. If a crime of this magnitude was committed by a poor person they would be disappeared for eternity.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    The amount of damage DOGE did, just so he could shut down all the investigations into his companies, is incalculable. He belongs in prison for the rest of his life.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 60 points 3 months ago
    [–] 28 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    So it turns out that all this time a law is only really a law if it's enforced. Most of my life I assumed laws were laws when they became laws. But nope, the past few years have demonstrated that my assumption was false.

    So no, he didn't break any Wisconsin laws because they ain't gonna do shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    untrue we'll probably build him a data center the way they are tanking this state, I hope we have a massive swing next election because we need to clean the whole state house from the influences of paul ryan, robin vos, scott walker and ron fucking jonson and all the rest of those who've sold out our state for their own enrichment

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Except that's not how it went down, it wasn't simply trying to get people to vote, you had to sign a form of intent saying you would vote for their candidate before you would be eligible for whatever piddly shit they were bribing people with, it should absolutely be an open and shut case in any just world.. but

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Likely!?!

    I'm so sick of this kid glove horseshit.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    To be fair to journalists, they have to phrase it this way, until it's proven in a court of law I guess.

    But I do hope that the article goes out of its way to point out that he broke the law already, many times, even with very similar shit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 3 months ago

    Mee-lon borke the law countless times. The president of the us of na broke the law countless times (the supreme court said that's ok).

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago

    Throw that bitch ass in prison

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago

    Next time I break the law I'll take my punishment as a sternly worded letter from the doj too thanks.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Even if they fined him a trillion dollars he would still be a billionaire.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Golly, I wonder what Dear Leader would say about that?

    gBdZn5a36JH671U.jpg

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago

    So fucking do something already.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago
    [–] 9 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Whoa! I know a whole set of Americans who are apparently really upset at immigrants coming and breaking the law, or so they say. This will be the top story on Fox News any minute now.

    Unfortunately though, he's too rich for consequences, and if recent history has shown us anything, it's that our corpo overlords think no consequences == no crime.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 3 months ago

    yet nobody did anything for 1+years, not even the DNC which they dint bother do any investigating the election machines.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    If you are worth a trillion dollars, you can't break the law

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    Who is going to enforce that?

    Minimum wage employees???

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago
    [–] 18 points 3 months ago

    And???

    It ain't like the "justice system" is going to do jack shit about it. You have to be poor in order to get your ass thrown in prison.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    Don't worry, I'm sure he'll have to pay a big fine of 0.000,000,00,000,001% of his net worth. Oh, and pinky promise not to do it again.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    That was only last year? It feels like three lifetimes ago.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago

    No kidding bribing people to vote is clearly illegal.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    "Elon broke the law"

    There fixed it for tou

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    Isn't it fun that the media offers a presumption of innocence when we're talking about our evil billionaire oligarchs despite hard facts to the contrary, but we get a presumption of guilt even when there is zero evidence to back it up?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    Did anyone ever to track and report further on the "winners"?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    No. You don't say...

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    Hopefully corruption along the way doesn't turn this into a, ya he did it, but his candidate lost so we'll give it a pass, type situation.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago*

    Timothy Mcveigh likely broke the law when he bombed the post office in Oklahoma.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    Gee, almost decided it might be a problem before the elecrions after next elections after the problem.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Wait. He actually GAVE them money? I thought I heard he only said he would, but never paid out because all the checks bounced.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago
    [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Is election fraud punished en gros or per vote?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago
    30 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 64 points 3 months ago (11 children)

    Remind me what's supposed to happen when people break the law

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    You get SMACKED or SLAMMED in newspaper articles. The damage to your ego is enough punishment really. Much worse than any fine or jail time.

    Billionaires have it rough.

    /s

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    First the papers CHOP you down, and then they DROPKICK you into the gutter, then SUPLEX your reputation, followed by a HEADLOCK, and then oh no what's this why are they climbing the corner post - MOONSAULT onto your ego with a flying elbow

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Ow, that hurt just to watch. Actually, after seeing the media give such a vicious beatdown, the billionaire seems like the underdog - we should really root for them instead!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Don't worry, the billionaire flouts all regulations and bravely pulls out a gun on his assailants. A tense deadlock ensues, but watch out oh dear here comes Bernie Sanders with the steel chair!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago

    Especially since it wasn't even a lottery, he flat out just picked who he thinks would play the best as advertisments, but sold it as "anyone can win"

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    The damage is now done and he's going to get what, a fine or some shit? Doubt it. A shrug and a strongly worded don't do that again- He will promptly do it again.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Even a $1bill fine would mean little to that man.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    man

    Lol.

    He's a soft little child trapped in a man's body.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    A fair point.

    It is amazing the level of emotional retardation that happens to these men when they start with money and then succeed in making a stupid, can’t even spend it all amount in their 20s. Real life has never happened for them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    We can (and should) elect a president who would go after all these criminals.

    There's literally no reason not to do it.

    Anyone telling you differently is just trying to get people to skip voting

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I'm 100% with you on this. The Dems are also complicit in not ensuring voters knew what illegal activities were happening at the time — when DOGE was in full swing, the left sat on their hands and allowed Musk and his army of hackers to siphon off terabytes of sensitive data. That said, I do believe in a swing of the pendulum, though this time it may swing further to the left than many expect.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    I mean, it depends on what you mean by "the Dems"...

    Schumer and Jefferies were/are lame ducks and obviously did nothing despite holding congressional leadership positions

    And the DNC stayed out of it, because they shouldn't be involved in stuff like that, the party should never be setting policy like that.

    Individual politicians with Ds by their names were ringing the alarm bells throughout that period and continue to do so.

    There just wasn't/isn't much they can do for the next 6 months.

    Things can get a lot better just by then

    That said, I do believe in a swing of the pendulum, though this time it may swing further to the left than many expect.

    I agree many don't see it coming...

    But for people that know history, another FDR is obviously right around the corner, and we're a lot more likely to get a progressive Senate/House which not having is what held FDR back. Even if not, the president has a lot more power compared to 80 years ago.

    Shit looks bad and could get way worse, but on a 20 year timeline I never been more optimistic about America's future.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 3 months ago

    The entire country is such fucking clown shoes.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    DOESN'T MATTER AT ALL UNLESS THERE ARE REPERCUSSIONS

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    But it's only a bribe if he actually paid anyone. I heard all checks bounced.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Wisconsin’s election bribery statute, which makes it illegal to offer “anything of value” to induce someone to vote, not vote, or support a candidate.

    https://www.newsweek.com/elon-musk-broken-election-laws-possible-outcomes-12198703

    Feel free to look up other sources or the actual statute.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    Definitely broke the law, and definitely will have zero consequences.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    LOL, "likely".

  • source