top 91 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 105 points 4 months ago (25 children)

The Complete Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy.

All of Discworld.

  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    All of Discworld.

    That'd be a pretty big book...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    I'm working on that currently. I think I'm on book 6, so only about 40 more to go lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    I don't know exactly how much of my warped view on reality is directly attributable to reading the Guide at a young age. I hope most of it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Likewise. I think it made us better people

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago

    After reading it in my early teens, I didn't know anyone who might enjoy it. So I took the book and wrote a note that said "This book is not just a book you find, it also finds you." and I put it in someones mailbox. I sometimes wonder if that person whoever it was liked it or even read it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago* (7 children)

    I’ve read the series (well only the Douglas authored books). I have a copy of The Complete Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy which I have not read. Does it make a difference?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

    Much like the TV minseries, book, movie, radio play and audiobooks - all incarnations of The Guide are accurate and complete, especially the parts that contradict.. It just depends on which multiverse you have existen been fromme. (Universal relativism weirds language.)

    At least that’s what I believe.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    The Guide from Mostly Harmless agrees with you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    See? Its even more internally consistent than the Bible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    I only wish we had gotten The Salmon of Doubt.

    While the Guide is important, I actually think Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency and Long Dark Teatime of the Soul might both be more important. I'm actually often saddened they didn't get as much love as Hitchhiker's Guide.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    The Douglas-authored books would be...all of the Hitchhikers' Guide books. Which is what the Complete Hitchhiker's Guide is.

    I think it may not make a difference, no.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago* (4 children)

    I was trying to narrow it down to 1 discworld book. Ive got it down to Small Gods, Jingo or Thud!.

    I also got confused whether a full stop goes after the ! Or not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Small gods is for sure one of my favorites!

    If there's an exclamation mark (!) there's generally no period (.).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Even in this case, where the ! is part of the title?

    It was 50/50 and looks like i picked unwisely

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago*

    The exclamation mark is part of the title. I would say the hard stop goes at the end of the sentence otherwise the exclamation mark could be construed as part of the sentence and not part of the title.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 31 points 4 months ago

    A pixie book or equivalent. Pixie books are short children's books (maybe 12 DinA6 pages with very little text and lots of pictures). They are dirt cheap and there is a big bowl full of them in many books stores in Germany. They are meant to get kids into reading and that's why I 'nominated' them here xD

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Meditations by Marcus Aurelius.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 26 points 4 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 19 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    A lot of fiction here so I'll go the other way and suggest "Perfectly Legal: The Covert Campaign to Rig Our Tax System to Benefit the Super Rich--and Cheat Everybody Else" by David Cay Johnston.

    https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/291700/perfectly-legal-by-david-cay-johnston/

    If people aren't outraged, they aren't paying attention.

    Sample:

    "Once, Blattmachr devised a way that Bill Gates, the richest man in America, could reap $200 million in profits on Microsoft stock without paying the $56 million of capital gains taxes that federal law required at the time. The plan was so lucrative that Gates would not have to pay a single dollar in tax and would even be entitled to an income tax deduction of $6 million or so. And that was just the initial plan. The concept could be applied endlessly, allowing Gates to convert billions of dollars in Microsoft stock gains into cash over the years. So long as the Internal Revenue Service did not challenge the deals, then Gates could realize unlimited capital gains without the pain of taxes.

    The trick was in manipulating charitable trusts, a common enough device used by generous people who own an asset, such as stock or a building that has appreciated in value. Instead of selling the asset and investing the after-tax proceeds, an individual or a married couple can donate the asset to a charitable trust that they control. The trust sells the asset tax-free and invests the proceeds, giving the donating individual or couple a lifetime income, typically 6 percent per year. When the donors die, what remains in the trust, typically half its value, goes to charity.

    Blattmachr’s plan was to take back not 6 percent annually for life, but 80 percent per year for two years. Gates could have pocketed at least $192 million without paying any tax. Then the trust would fold and a charity would get the remaining sum, less than $8 million. Under the plan Gates could have converted into cash more than 96 percent of gains on the Microsoft shares he donated, not the 72 percent he was entitled to after federal capital gains taxes. The charity would get less than four cents on each donated dollar. The government would collect nothing.

    The scheme even created a tax deduction that was enough to reduce Gates’s income taxes by about $2 million.

    Whether Gates took advantage of such a plan is not known for sure because the law makes individual income tax records confidential. What is known is that when Blattmachr made this route available to others, it sold like a treasure map where X marks the tax-free spot. Billions of dollars of assets poured into these short-term charitable trusts and their super-rich owners took many millions of dollars of income tax deductions that further cut into the flow of revenue to the government.

    The technique was so outlandish that when some other tax lawyers got their hands on the map in March 1994, they sent it to the Department of the Treasury in a plain brown envelope. That July, Treasury blocked the route to newcomers and said that it would pursue those who used the device. However, the Internal Revenue Service never announced whether it collected any of the taxes. One hint that the IRS may not have acted against those who used the technique can be found in the records of United States Tax Court, which is where taxpayers challenge the IRS. There are no Tax Court cases in which taxpayers fought for a court blessing on the device, known in taxspeak as an “accelerated charitable remainder trust.”

    The Treasury rules shutting down this route to tax-free investment profits were not the end of stretching charitable trusts in ways never anticipated by Congress. So facile is Blattmachr’s mind that from those 1994 rules he divined a new route to tax-free gains. He started selling a new treasure map and billions of dollars more in capital gains passed untaxed into the bank accounts of his clients before the government blocked that second path, known in taxspeak as “son of accelerated charitable remainder trust.”

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    There’s been a lot of abuse of Trusts in finance for a while. This seems like a good recommendation.

    One thing I don’t follow; if someone puts their money into a charitable trust, achieving those lighter tax rules, wouldn’t the obvious rule be that the trust could only then be spent on communal benefit, NOT withdrawn as a personal piggy bank?

    It’s fine if someone wants to make an account that is given to charity in case of their death, but then pro-charity tax rules shouldn’t take effect until they die. I’m confused as to why it wouldn’t work that way.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Stranger in a Strange Land

    Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

    Same message, two vastly different methods of communicating it

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (2 children)

    I'm not sure hhgttg recommends incest with large breasted red heads as much as stranger in a strange land.

    I guess I'll bite, what's the message?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    recommends incest with large breasted red heads as much as stranger in a strange land.

    Whut?

    I guess I’ll bite, what’s the message?

    That life is inexplicable and overly complicated because people are hung up on others perceptions instead of what makes them happy. And if everyone just chilled out and tried to make shit a lot better, we'd all be better off

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    This is my mistake,.I went through a Heinlein phase and this one was the last straw for me.I may have had some bleedover from his other books, where I recall his treatment of women sucked ass, was pretty incestuous, and always features promiscuous red heads. I did really like "the moon is a harsh mistress" even if I think libitarism is purile.

    I still think stranger is just a Jesus story (it's been ages), where hhgtg didn't have a point except maybe you are at the mercy of the universe, and God is sorry for the inconvenience.

    I'm not sure how you got that message, Arthur specifically isn't even aware of his friend being an alien when his house is demolished. He kind of just faces what's next in terror, at least until the fenchurch bits. Even when he's stuck on earth I wouldn't say he's having a good time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    A Wizard of Earthsea by Ursula K. Le Guin.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 75 points 4 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    Was going to say this, many people cite it but never read. It is readable well, do it.

    Also, I think Fahrenheit 451 translates far better to our situation, as I see media and social media in there long before it was even thinkable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    1984/farenheit 451/Brave New World are the adolescent trilogy for me that anyone who wants to understand the nature of people and mechanics of power would do well to read.

    I'd add Animal Farm to that as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    It's good to add the other two too but I never could read brave new world, I struggled page by page and gave up. Can not name a specific reason other than I could not get into it.

    From a story perspective it should be perfect for me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Aldos Huxley is not a great writer. I think he had a better understanding of humanity than Orwell... Or at least, I feel like his books are more insightful, but he is not as good of a writer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    One of the few times reading a translated book is better tgan the original, I read it in Spanish and I guess the translator made it more tolerable because I'm not much of a reader at all (I've read at most five books on my own, less if we don't count unfinished)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 4 months ago

    Demon Haunted World -Carl Sagan

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 4 months ago

    Any one of them.

    Please.

  • source
  • [–] 52 points 4 months ago* (7 children)

    A People's History of the United States, by Howard Zinn.

    There is so, so much that Americans don't know that they don't know.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Got some random highlights? I’m curious how many I’ve seen mentioned on Lemmy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

    The first that I usually mention is the Coal Wars / Battle of Blair Mountain or the Sand Creek Massacre, but there are many events that American students are made to be ignorant if on purpose.

    It also got me to learn that after meeting the natives for the first time, Columbus literally wrote in his diary about how easy it would be to steal from them because they were so peaceful.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Cool, I knew about those! The ones that threw me for a loop were Seneca Village (Black community bulldozed for Central Park) and the bombing by police in Philly in 1983.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    Oh yeah. Thank you for sharing.

    I've heard of those two as well, but even so, there's a lot written about in the book that I never learned, even through the earning of my bachelors degree, which is why I'm always quick to recommend that people read it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Reading that right now. Definitely changing my perspective that America was once a good place.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago

    Follow it up with Settlers, a history of settler-colonialism and the slave trade in the US. No matter how much you think you know about the history of indigenous genocide and chattel slavery in the US, reality is likely far worse than you think.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago

    While I read it in university for a history class… I quite like Candide by Voltaire. Sometimes we all should just tend our own gardens.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 4 months ago

    Aldous Huxley's Island. Something to aim for.

    Also, it's been a while since I read it, and it's a bit didactic, but Daniel Quinn's Ishmael. It's about a telepathic gorilla, and it had the capacity to blow minds.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    Shogūn (really hope I got that phonetic right) by James Clavell. Even, maybe especially if you're not a weeaboo.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    I fell into an amazing illustrated edition from The Folio Society:

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Fuck it was the ō. That looks really sick though. Could you post a picture of one of the illustrations???

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    That was a stock image, these are my personal copy.

    Artist is Chris Malbon:

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

    The Dispossessed by Ursula Le Guin.

    Few other sci-fi books do as good a job of depicting how a gift/library economy could work like in practice. It's quite a hopeful vision of where we can collectively go in the future.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    The Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck. Just the intermissions would get everyone's blood boiling.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 4 months ago (8 children)

    1984, so that people mentioning it online will stop sounding like complete fucking idiots.

    Or perhaps The Jungle; it sparked public outcry and major overhauls the last time it became popular, maybe it can work its magic again.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    1984 was about the government being able to read your mind so they can give you a rat, right?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    No, that was the diary of Ann Frank actually.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 5 points 4 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 19 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Hah. I'd be happy to hear that everyone read at least one book in their lifetime.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Which is ridiculous. I've read one book since the weekend.

    It should be made clear though that there are book and there are Books. I feel like this question is about the latter and those are not the ones you had to read in as part of your middle/high school curriculum. Also the one that I read probably doesn't qualify as a capital B book.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Atlas Shrugged

    (Haha just kidding!)

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago*

    The Fountainhead was actually an interesting enough story even if you don't agree with the message Rand conveyed.

    Atlas shrugged is just... Verbose. Has a plot but my god, the pages upon pages of monologue was too much.

    But in the end neither are required reading (and I know you weren't suggesting as such.)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago

    Oh the places you'll go!
    Dr Seuss

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago
    [–] 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

    The egg by Andy Weir. It gave me the basis for Gnosticism / the spirituality that I genuinely think is closest to the truth ie: humans do have a soul, but it's all the same soul / consciousness that just splits up into sperate little chunks of perception for a little bit at a time before rejoining the whole in different places and splitting off again from and to a completely different place. Honestly the main thing I learned from psychology, neurology, and physics classes is that time, or at least the human perception of it, is almost completely bullshit, and that our perception of our brain as a separate thing that controls the rest of our body, or even as our body as a separate thing from the world like a suit in space is a significant cause of mental illness.

    Why does our sense of self so often stop at our brain when most of our neurotransmitters are in our gut? How can you be the cells but not the fluid you filter then piss out? Your upper layers of skin and hair are dead how can they be more you than the air trapped between them? There's a reason drugs dissolving your sense of self, even temporarily, is often described as a positively transformative experience.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago

    Paulo Coelho - The Alchemist
    Robert M. Pirsig - Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance
    Stephen King - The Stand

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›