And what kind of pedestrian crossing looks like that?

The sign above the button looks like a 1 hour parking sign, and the big brown sign should be legible even with all the jpeg

Yellow lines always separate directions of travel. So yellow lines will only be down the middle of the road. White lines will be in between lanes travelling the same direction, and along the edges of the road.

there is an intersection near me (east coast USA) with one lane on one side of 2 yellow lines and 3 lanes on the other side. It's definitely possible. It does have turning arrows, but those would be a bit out of view from this angle I think (they're kinda far back). The picture is still very implausible though because of the very uneven lane widths and the weird crosswalk paint. The closest lane looks like it could only fit half a car.

I like to think coyotes are perfectly capable of this behavior, but they make the conscious choice to be lawless jaywalkers to stick it to the man.

Wait, look at the placement of the road markings, especially the yellow line. Wtf

also notice how they try to sound like newspaper article without saying anything specific.

genuine news texts will say "person x from institution y says: >...<" not "biologists believe" and "lead researcher says".

Yeah. It was amazing and wild while it lasted, though.

pah, stand aside

That's actually a more convincing image. The one looks like it's hiding something because it's so low-res

I've seen foxes use the crosswalk, but never push the button. If the story stayed at "This animal is smart enough to know that it won't get hit if it stays in the little white lines" then I probably wouldn't have clocked it. Still, what a horrible, dishonest thing to do.

I asked the Magic 8 Ball and it said that signs point to yes.

Gemini is worse than useless when it comes to this sort of thing. It's simultaneously the most confidently-wrong of any AI model and also the most willing to fold to even the smallest amount of criticism.

It will tell you whatever you want to hear, every time, regardless of the actual reality.

Why do people even bother with AI, when it's so often wrong?

Just say no.

You do see the flaw in your logic here, right?

These screenshots are art.

See your problem here was asking for sources. Why would you need sources sir? You should just enjoy you got an answer, Sheesh!!

I always get a kick out of people getting frustrated when they SHOW AN AI SOMETHING and then ask if it's "real."

Ai: "Of course its, 'real.' Bitch, you just showed it to me."

Stunning amount of hammer hate coming from people who aim for their thumbs.