▲ 654 ▼ The speed of light (mander.xyz) submitted 5 months ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz 123 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 81 points 5 months ago (19 children) permalink fedilink source hideshow 19 child comments replies: [–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 206 points 5 months ago (6 children) When sailing boats pushed for speed they ended up hitting an unexpected speed barrier. As you increase velocity the break wave created by the bow of the ship elongates until the length of the ship is at 1 wavelength, then the hull drag prevents further acceleration. For a 50 meter ship it's about 17 knots. You can get much faster lifting the boat from the water as you gain speed with an underwater wing, the current max speed was set 47 years ago at ~276 knots. But that's only because they can remove the hull from the high drag environment and is extremely dangerous to attempt to break. The speed of light is nothing like that because spacetime itself can stretch and squish, I just wanted to talk about boats for a bit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 40 points 5 months ago Still very interesting permalink fedilink source parent [–] icelimit@lemmy.ml 36 points 5 months ago* So you're saying, we need to jump the spaceship out from space/time. With a wing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 5 months ago (1 child) I'm not even mad because now I get why and how these competition multihull boats basically fly above water while keeping like 1% of the boat in water permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 months ago Those ones are reaching a new speed limit as well, the cavitation around the hydrofoil starts at a certain speed/angle and stalls the foil, which then abruptly drops the hull back into the water. I’ve been wondering how long before the equivalent of variable swept wings will be added to the cup boats. permalink fedilink source parent [–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 5 months ago I love this because this feels like something the 10th doctor would say to confused daleks while stalling permalink fedilink source parent [–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago I don't like being deceived John! Tell me more about boats! permalink fedilink source parent [–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 41 points 5 months ago* (5 children) You have two observers, moving directly opposite each other. Each has a flashlight pointing back at the other. The speed of the light from those torched is the same for both observers. (Instead the light would be red-shifted.) Add a third observer, stationary to one and moving towards the other. As the third observer passes that observer, the speed of light from their flashlight never changes, and it’s the same speed as from the other two. (Instead it would go from being blue shifted to red shifted.) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] scbasteve@lemmy.world 48 points 5 months ago (4 children) This adds substantially more questions than it answers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] technohacker@programming.dev 35 points 5 months ago -Scientists after discovering General Relativity permalink fedilink source parent [–] derek@infosec.pub 6 points 5 months ago It makes sense after accepting spacetime is mutable. Reference frames are merely referential localization. permalink fedilink source parent [–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 months ago It's complicated (and don't trust me too much, I'm not qualified), but if you've heard of time dilation and whatnot, if you start traveling at speeds comparable to the speed of light, spacetime distorts in such a way that from your point of view all light coming from any direction travels at the same speed. This is also why (or one of the reasons) according to science you cannot travel faster than the speed of light, since light would still need to be traveling away from you at the speed of light and you'd need to occupy negative space in that direction, or something like that. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works -2 points 5 months ago Different phases (colours of light) move at different speed, and have different longevity, I think. So how they always thought those pretty galaxy nebula photos, were red? Actually turns out that phase of light just travels for a longer time. Lasts longer. OK, now someone correct me, because I have absolutely no idea what I'm talking about. Just bring up vague floating memories from an article i read once. permalink fedilink source parent [–] tuxiqae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 months ago (4 children) The fact that this gif has a brief pause between the "ex" and the "explain" really irks me permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] MJKee9@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago Ex...Term...Ah....Nate!!!! permalink fedilink source parent [–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (2 children) It’s there to convey the line’s intonation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] tuxiqae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 months ago (1 child) Yeah, so it should be "Ex" and then add to it "plain" The way it currently is looks like a stutter, "ex-explain" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago Well now it's ruined for me permalink fedilink source parent [–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago The simplest explanation I know: Nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. If you ever end up with something that makes the speed of light change, it's actually time that changes. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 206 points 5 months ago (6 children) When sailing boats pushed for speed they ended up hitting an unexpected speed barrier. As you increase velocity the break wave created by the bow of the ship elongates until the length of the ship is at 1 wavelength, then the hull drag prevents further acceleration. For a 50 meter ship it's about 17 knots. You can get much faster lifting the boat from the water as you gain speed with an underwater wing, the current max speed was set 47 years ago at ~276 knots. But that's only because they can remove the hull from the high drag environment and is extremely dangerous to attempt to break. The speed of light is nothing like that because spacetime itself can stretch and squish, I just wanted to talk about boats for a bit. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 40 points 5 months ago Still very interesting permalink fedilink source parent [–] icelimit@lemmy.ml 36 points 5 months ago* So you're saying, we need to jump the spaceship out from space/time. With a wing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 5 months ago (1 child) I'm not even mad because now I get why and how these competition multihull boats basically fly above water while keeping like 1% of the boat in water permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 months ago Those ones are reaching a new speed limit as well, the cavitation around the hydrofoil starts at a certain speed/angle and stalls the foil, which then abruptly drops the hull back into the water. I’ve been wondering how long before the equivalent of variable swept wings will be added to the cup boats. permalink fedilink source parent [–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 5 months ago I love this because this feels like something the 10th doctor would say to confused daleks while stalling permalink fedilink source parent [–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago I don't like being deceived John! Tell me more about boats! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 40 points 5 months ago Still very interesting permalink fedilink source parent
[–] icelimit@lemmy.ml 36 points 5 months ago* So you're saying, we need to jump the spaceship out from space/time. With a wing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 5 months ago (1 child) I'm not even mad because now I get why and how these competition multihull boats basically fly above water while keeping like 1% of the boat in water permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 months ago Those ones are reaching a new speed limit as well, the cavitation around the hydrofoil starts at a certain speed/angle and stalls the foil, which then abruptly drops the hull back into the water. I’ve been wondering how long before the equivalent of variable swept wings will be added to the cup boats. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] anomnom@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 months ago Those ones are reaching a new speed limit as well, the cavitation around the hydrofoil starts at a certain speed/angle and stalls the foil, which then abruptly drops the hull back into the water. I’ve been wondering how long before the equivalent of variable swept wings will be added to the cup boats. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 5 months ago I love this because this feels like something the 10th doctor would say to confused daleks while stalling permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago I don't like being deceived John! Tell me more about boats! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 41 points 5 months ago* (5 children) You have two observers, moving directly opposite each other. Each has a flashlight pointing back at the other. The speed of the light from those torched is the same for both observers. (Instead the light would be red-shifted.) Add a third observer, stationary to one and moving towards the other. As the third observer passes that observer, the speed of light from their flashlight never changes, and it’s the same speed as from the other two. (Instead it would go from being blue shifted to red shifted.) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] scbasteve@lemmy.world 48 points 5 months ago (4 children) This adds substantially more questions than it answers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] technohacker@programming.dev 35 points 5 months ago -Scientists after discovering General Relativity permalink fedilink source parent [–] derek@infosec.pub 6 points 5 months ago It makes sense after accepting spacetime is mutable. Reference frames are merely referential localization. permalink fedilink source parent [–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 months ago It's complicated (and don't trust me too much, I'm not qualified), but if you've heard of time dilation and whatnot, if you start traveling at speeds comparable to the speed of light, spacetime distorts in such a way that from your point of view all light coming from any direction travels at the same speed. This is also why (or one of the reasons) according to science you cannot travel faster than the speed of light, since light would still need to be traveling away from you at the speed of light and you'd need to occupy negative space in that direction, or something like that. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works -2 points 5 months ago Different phases (colours of light) move at different speed, and have different longevity, I think. So how they always thought those pretty galaxy nebula photos, were red? Actually turns out that phase of light just travels for a longer time. Lasts longer. OK, now someone correct me, because I have absolutely no idea what I'm talking about. Just bring up vague floating memories from an article i read once. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] scbasteve@lemmy.world 48 points 5 months ago (4 children) This adds substantially more questions than it answers. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] technohacker@programming.dev 35 points 5 months ago -Scientists after discovering General Relativity permalink fedilink source parent [–] derek@infosec.pub 6 points 5 months ago It makes sense after accepting spacetime is mutable. Reference frames are merely referential localization. permalink fedilink source parent [–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 months ago It's complicated (and don't trust me too much, I'm not qualified), but if you've heard of time dilation and whatnot, if you start traveling at speeds comparable to the speed of light, spacetime distorts in such a way that from your point of view all light coming from any direction travels at the same speed. This is also why (or one of the reasons) according to science you cannot travel faster than the speed of light, since light would still need to be traveling away from you at the speed of light and you'd need to occupy negative space in that direction, or something like that. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works -2 points 5 months ago Different phases (colours of light) move at different speed, and have different longevity, I think. So how they always thought those pretty galaxy nebula photos, were red? Actually turns out that phase of light just travels for a longer time. Lasts longer. OK, now someone correct me, because I have absolutely no idea what I'm talking about. Just bring up vague floating memories from an article i read once. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] technohacker@programming.dev 35 points 5 months ago -Scientists after discovering General Relativity permalink fedilink source parent
[–] derek@infosec.pub 6 points 5 months ago It makes sense after accepting spacetime is mutable. Reference frames are merely referential localization. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 months ago It's complicated (and don't trust me too much, I'm not qualified), but if you've heard of time dilation and whatnot, if you start traveling at speeds comparable to the speed of light, spacetime distorts in such a way that from your point of view all light coming from any direction travels at the same speed. This is also why (or one of the reasons) according to science you cannot travel faster than the speed of light, since light would still need to be traveling away from you at the speed of light and you'd need to occupy negative space in that direction, or something like that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works -2 points 5 months ago Different phases (colours of light) move at different speed, and have different longevity, I think. So how they always thought those pretty galaxy nebula photos, were red? Actually turns out that phase of light just travels for a longer time. Lasts longer. OK, now someone correct me, because I have absolutely no idea what I'm talking about. Just bring up vague floating memories from an article i read once. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tuxiqae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 months ago (4 children) The fact that this gif has a brief pause between the "ex" and the "explain" really irks me permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] MJKee9@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago Ex...Term...Ah....Nate!!!! permalink fedilink source parent [–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (2 children) It’s there to convey the line’s intonation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] tuxiqae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 months ago (1 child) Yeah, so it should be "Ex" and then add to it "plain" The way it currently is looks like a stutter, "ex-explain" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago Well now it's ruined for me permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MJKee9@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago Ex...Term...Ah....Nate!!!! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (2 children) It’s there to convey the line’s intonation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] tuxiqae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 months ago (1 child) Yeah, so it should be "Ex" and then add to it "plain" The way it currently is looks like a stutter, "ex-explain" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago Well now it's ruined for me permalink fedilink source parent
[–] tuxiqae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 5 months ago (1 child) Yeah, so it should be "Ex" and then add to it "plain" The way it currently is looks like a stutter, "ex-explain" permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago Well now it's ruined for me permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 1 point 5 months ago Well now it's ruined for me permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 point 5 months ago The simplest explanation I know: Nothing can travel faster than the speed of light. If you ever end up with something that makes the speed of light change, it's actually time that changes. permalink fedilink source parent