Counter point on that, that might affect the legality of DNS over HTTPS

Reminds me of a video essay from SovietWomble about a game. Bit of a spoiler since he's got very few video essays posted so look away if you must buut:

In the game The Forest, he noticed that there's very little items connecting the game mechanics to the final story, and also how they messed up by doing part of the game world the wrong way around, mismatching two halves of the map and making facts from the lore mismatch the actual environment.

He mentioned how it was very likely a symptom of poor planning, and mentioned how the whole point of doing several meetings is so that even if you spend a lot of time just in meetings, you save a whole lot more by avoiding wasted work and keeping a consistent plan

Shader Editor on Android, I write my own live wallpapers right on my phone!

I can kinda get the sentiment behind that polarization. There's such a strong drift towards LLM use that it takes hardline stances to try and slow it down

Oof, yeah that's rough. Thanks for sharing this though, this is the first time I'd heard of Tata owning steel manufacture overseas too

I'm not sure it's all of them really. Electricity, water, waste disposal and intra state roads are usually state/city owned utilities in India, with Highway, Railway and most of the Oil and Gas ones under the central government. Some are taken up by both, like public education. Even for the ones that Tata and Reliance are fairly nestled in, there's government owned competitors (ex. Steel manufacture and Telcom)

I'm necessarily summarising here, but there's a non-negligible level of public sector competition here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_Sector_Undertakings_in_India

It's genuinely impressive how many domains they've conglomerated into, I'd compare them to Samsung. Kinda helps that the family is more of the industrialist kind rather than the pure corpo kind, though I really wouldn't be surprised if they had controversies of their own

I mean, personally it's because I don't get a lot of messages in the first place, and most of the time I'm just lost in my thoughts and not actively busy so it's a nice change of pace. Now, even I'll admit 2 seconds is a little short, but I'm often ready with a response within 10

I believe he meant to say no lasting nuclear debris, ie not a dirty bomb. The bomb explodes and releases lethal radiation, but the resulting irradiated terrain will be comparatively safe comparatively quickly

Note that the article feels LLM-generated, here's the wiki link instead: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Movile_Cave

.kkreiger! (Maybe not the one you were referring to, but fits the bill at 96KB in size)

Percentages are somewhat misleading here. That's around 2 in 25, enough to falsely accuse a student or 2 in a fairly standard classroom for example.

I remember somebody mentioning a quote along the lines of "A 95% success rate sounds good, until you become the 1 in 20 that it kills"