cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/32524920

I watched several videos on a Combine Harvester's inner workings and I still don't understand how this thing works.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 166 points 10 months ago* (26 children)

Well, the first step was making a machine that does every step of the process to make it easier. Then you combine those machines into one big machine, hence "combine".

No one starts from zero and builds a machine like this. Each of those processes was its own problem that got solved first.

  • source
  • hideshow 26 child comments
  • [–] 78 points 10 months ago (11 children)

    People don't seem to understand that complicated things don't just get invented out of nowhere. They almost always are the result of many steps along the way, each of which was useful in its own right.

    And that's why it's common that multiple people invent the same thing at the same time. Like the theory of evolution, or the telephone. These things may be complicated, but all of the building blocks were created over a long time, and suddenly, their invention or discovery becomes inevitable.

    Not to say that it never happens that people make large leaps, but it's rare.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    To many "smart" people have stood up and taken the credit for hundreds of others and generations of work.

    We have been sold and buy the idea that there a supermen out there that are beyond clever and capable when they are just the result of their environment and resources from others. And now history is looked at through that lenses looking for singulars where there is plural.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    To many “smart” people have stood up and taken the credit for hundreds of others and generations of work.

    Like CEOs taking credit for all the work their engineers did.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 10 months ago (1 child)

    Same with evolution. "The eyeball is too complex to evolve as a whole unit!" Well, that's absolutely correct. First, start with a patch of light sensitive cells, iterate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    Even all those different little inventions had plenty of steps along the way, and almost all of them were viable during its time.

    The greatest strength humanity has had to create ingenious machines wasn't intelligence.

    It was time and manpower.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 10 months ago (11 children)

    Ok let's start with one. How does one even start to make a self-propelling machine that cuts wheat stalks at ground level?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    Make a self propelled machine and a machine that cuts grass and smoosh them together.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 10 months ago (3 children)

    We did two things first:

    First we made a (simple) machine that cuts wheat stalks at ground level (scythe).

    Second we made a (complex) machine that is self-propelling.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

    I'm gonna guess there was an intermediate step where we put mechanical scythes on horses or something

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 10 months ago

    Well first there's the cutting technology. Scything is ancient. Industrial production of push mowers using cylinder blades were developed in the 1800s and the more modern gas powered rotary cutters came along in the 19th century with many other self-propelled and automated mechanisms. This started with coal and wood fired agricultural equipment used for processing, like threshing and winnowing. As internal combustion engines (gas powered) developed in the 20th century more equipment and processes could be incorporated on-site and in-field.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 10 months ago

    How does one even start to make a self-propelling machine that cuts wheat stalks at ground level?

    You look at a horse-drawn mowing machine like this and start thinking about how you could do something similar without the horse.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

    Stationary processing of grain. Then stationary automated processing of grain. Then add a cutting machine (from harvesting hay) and self-propelling and you've got your combine harvester.

    The loading thing? A extruder on a swivel, old tech.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 10 months ago

    When I was taught that Philo Farnsworth, a "farmer" who "invented" television by using the idea of plowing a field in parallel lines to display an image, I was completely dumbfounded. A farmer figured out how to build a vacuum tube, fire an electron beam, deflect it at phosphor-coated surface, and do so in lines, varying the intensity, to display an image? This simplistic "history" skips about 50 years of progress in vacuum tube design and absolutely fascinating mechanical television.

    On that note, The Upright Thinkers by Leonard Mlodinow is a good book about scientific progress, and really drives a point about incremental nature progress.

  • source
  • parent