- Someone want to claim "illegals" were voting in blue states when Democrats started winning elections but didn't expect the massive loses in red states.
First the trans affirming misogynist parrot, now the transition assistance moose.
The simple wisdom of animals never ceases to amaze.
Yes, but even AFAB people sometimes take Cialis for pulmonary hypertension. So you need to tell me if you take any kind of "PDE5 inhibitor" sildenafil/Viagra, vardenafil/Levitra, tadalafil/Cialis, ED med, or "boner pill" for any reason at all. Any gas station pills? Are you sure?
I need to know because this nitroglycerin tablet I'm considering to treat your chest pain has some interactions with those kinds of medications. The biggest one being dying.
even in medical contexts
I don't ask anyone their AGAB in the back of the ambulance, but there's a chance I need to know what organs someone does or does not have (regardless of gender). I'll straight out ask "Do you have _______?" if it's relevant to the symptoms, along with an explanation as to why I'm asking if necessary. It's not just reproductive organs either: appendix, kidneys, intact lungs, etc -- but people never have a problem answering when I ask about those.
I don't know the patient, have access to their medical information, or have "labs" and imaging equipment. I'm not going to make assumptions because that's both shitty and irresponsible. All I have are my eyes, ears, hands, and some potentially invasive questions. My job is to figure out what's going on so we can start fixing it and get definitive treatment started faster as the hospital. I also want to know acuity so someone doesn't die waiting in the ED.
E.g. "I don't have ovaries or a uterus" eliminates a ton of possibilities for what's causing intense abdominal pain -- burst ovarian cyst, ectopic pregnancy, dysmenorrhea, etc. "I don't have a prostate" is the same for urinary retention or polyuria. Can't have testicular torsion if you don't have testicles, and it saves us both from me asking to look at your crotch if you tell me.
If I have a good working diagnosis and supporting findings to give in my inbound and handoff report we might bypass the ED and go straight to the appropriate floor, or at least bypass triage and go straight to a room. The attending staff at the hospital have a better idea of where to start with tests, imaging, and treatment.
There are degrees of shitbaggery. There are people that can be redeemed without too much pain.
Nobody is an angel: everyone has harmful views and does bad things -- it's just a question quantity and quality. As much as it sucks the reality is if we set the bar too high we're going to spend life alone ... and risk being a hypocrite as well.
So we tolerate peoples failings as we hope they tolerate ours. We grow and redeem ourselves by learning of our flaws and blind spots from other people.
That being said there's a line where its not worth it. Everyone has to decide where that is for themselves.
Not conservative, not "republican": MAGA.
My MAGA relatives are some of the worst human beings I've met. Hateful, loud, dumb bigots that seem unable to act like a decent human being for more than a few minutes at a time. I've heard the shit they've let slip out and they meant (and mean) every word.
They're not welcome in my home and I am sure as shit am not wasting my time on them.
Hilariously, it seems to have backfired in several instances for the GOP.
Be gay, do crime.
I learned phonics (which is essential) but also ended up self-teaching myself visual reading. Unless there's an unfamiliar word or unusual sentence structure I usually don't subvocalize or "hear" what I'm reading. When I was younger teachers would be upset because I typically finished reading the novel they assigned in the first or second in class "reading time".
So there is absolutely significant value in visual reading, skimming, cueing, etc -- but skipping phonics is insane. It's like teaching someone how to run before they can walk. It also ignores not everyone is great at running and leaves those people especially screwed.
brain dead
Yes, because after 3 major election cycles that were inundated with (proven) bad actors flooding social media with the same tired talking points people aren't suspicious of brand new accounts relentlessly spaming those same talking points right before another major election.
God, people are so braindead.
The one you'd rather fight.
It's almost as if they're both bad: but one is significantly worse than the other and in most races there isn't a viable 3rd option.
So if regardless of who wins we're going to have to coerce, argue, and fight them ... why the hell wouldn't we pick the one we have a better chance against?