▲ 392 ▼ Can anyone identify this colony formation? (mander.xyz) submitted 1 year ago by fossilesque@mander.xyz to c/science_memes@mander.xyz 49 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (30 children) Look at the calendar, it's 9/11... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 30 child comments replies: [–] dudinax@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago (29 children) Is this some kind of meta-joke? What does Saddam have to do with 9/11? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 29 child comments replies: [+] over_clox@lemmy.world -16 points 1 year ago (27 children) This is not at all a joke. Saddam Hussein orchestrated the 9/11 attack. This isn't even funny, please educate yourself. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 27 child comments replies: [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (19 children) Are you conflating Osama Bin Laden with Saddam Hussein, for whom as summarized by wikipedia: In 2003, a US-led coalition invaded Iraq, falsely accusing him of developing weapons of mass destruction and of having ties with al-Qaeda. Unless you have that evidence the world was looking for I don't want to spread old, debunked propaganda. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 19 child comments replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (16 children) Oh please, Obama wasn't even on the scene when I got the info on Osama, I definitely know the difference. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (15 children) Can you cite where Saddam is involved in 9/11? Again, it's generally accepted history that the Bush Administration claimed he supported the attacks, never presented evidence he was involved, then later admitted he was not involved. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/sep/12/september11.usa2 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 child) Also, that document was first archived in August 2013, not 2006, not 2001 https://web.archive.org/web/20130830185412/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/sep/12/september11.usa2 So please don't try to refer me to ancient shit that could have been altered over many years... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I'll stop referring to sources that could have been altered, when you start providing specifics about who you think deleted what and why? permalink fedilink source parent [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (12 children) Did you miss the mass erase of online data? My data is before the mass erase. I don't even trust modern links, they've all been tampered with. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) They're in your walls they're gonna come for you permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* Har har, you're phunny. Some say perfect paranoia is perfect awareness. No, I don't believe there are microphones or cameras hidden in the walls. You think I'm stupid? The microphones and cameras are right here in the tablet I'm holding right now.. Nothing hidden anymore, it's right in front of you... permalink fedilink source parent [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) You do realize that reads like you're off your meds. I work in IT. There have definitely been several attacks on the quality of information available to the general public in the last few decades, but none that I would qualify as a singular "the" Could you be more specific on which attack (or by whom) you're referring to? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] skisnow@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago I think they're a person who's honestly in a dark place. I think they're objectively wrong about the 'Saddam being linked to 9/11' thing, and I worry that they've been a bit lost in their own head a bit. The idea that data was deleted isn't meritless in the sense that between enshittification and Musk's tech bros there's good reason to believe censorship and destruction have occurred recently (and they're only the latest in a long line of maliciously maligned actors). But I agree that their posts are so ridiculously textbook schizophrenic, that I do wonder if it's an act. Yet, nonetheless it costs me little to be kind. 😅 permalink fedilink source parent [+] fossilesque@mander.xyz [S] 1 point 1 year ago (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (5 children) GAO-04-1033T Legit info, and I'm sure that's not all.. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] fossilesque@mander.xyz [S] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (3 children) I don't trust any information about this subject, even my own info. It's all very prone to misinformation, propaganda, and general manipulation. But of all sources you'd suggest, Wikipedia? You gotta be shitting me. My sources are between the GAO (Government Accountability Office) and a hefty data dump of early years of Wikileaks. Anyways, yeah I have plenty enough reason to not trust currently available information, it's all probably been cherry picked and edited to hell and back for the modern narrative. I have much more original information. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I'm not trusting any external source here. I grew up under the Bush presidency and simply remember the whole fiasco. Bush and friends invented the link to justify their prior war plans, when pushed to prove there was a connection, Bush failed to produce evidence. You're implying Bush (or … someone?) had the evidence that would have vindicated him, but rather than share it, deliberately buried it and successfully hid it from the whole world? permalink fedilink source parent [+] fossilesque@mander.xyz [S] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago I just got done saying that I don't trust any info on this subject, even the huge archive I inherited from my late father. But I'm more inclined to trust the data from my late father, before many documents conveniently got edited, blacked out or just became missing. Anyways, I don't care what anyone thinks or can or cannot prove about Hussein, it's perfectly normal to hide in a hole in the ground if you've done nothing wrong... Oh wait.. permalink fedilink source parent [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago Also, Bin Laden was a puppet of Hussein permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] dellish@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago Dafaq? Saddam had nothing to do with it, and a vast majority of the world knew that at the time. That's why the bullshit WMD story was circulated as an excuse to attack, and still most of the world was dubious at best. permalink fedilink source parent [+] fossilesque@mander.xyz [S] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] over_clox@lemmy.world -7 points 1 year ago (4 children) Please just don't, I've got gigabytes of info on this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children) Do you realize that the damaged area of the Pentagon was way smaller than the plane that supposedly hit it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago You should make a video about this and put it on YouTube and let us know when you’re done. Use all your data permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) load more comments (1 reply)
[–] dudinax@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago (29 children) Is this some kind of meta-joke? What does Saddam have to do with 9/11? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 29 child comments replies: [+] over_clox@lemmy.world -16 points 1 year ago (27 children) This is not at all a joke. Saddam Hussein orchestrated the 9/11 attack. This isn't even funny, please educate yourself. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 27 child comments replies: [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (19 children) Are you conflating Osama Bin Laden with Saddam Hussein, for whom as summarized by wikipedia: In 2003, a US-led coalition invaded Iraq, falsely accusing him of developing weapons of mass destruction and of having ties with al-Qaeda. Unless you have that evidence the world was looking for I don't want to spread old, debunked propaganda. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 19 child comments replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (16 children) Oh please, Obama wasn't even on the scene when I got the info on Osama, I definitely know the difference. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (15 children) Can you cite where Saddam is involved in 9/11? Again, it's generally accepted history that the Bush Administration claimed he supported the attacks, never presented evidence he was involved, then later admitted he was not involved. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/sep/12/september11.usa2 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 child) Also, that document was first archived in August 2013, not 2006, not 2001 https://web.archive.org/web/20130830185412/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/sep/12/september11.usa2 So please don't try to refer me to ancient shit that could have been altered over many years... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I'll stop referring to sources that could have been altered, when you start providing specifics about who you think deleted what and why? permalink fedilink source parent [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (12 children) Did you miss the mass erase of online data? My data is before the mass erase. I don't even trust modern links, they've all been tampered with. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) They're in your walls they're gonna come for you permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* Har har, you're phunny. Some say perfect paranoia is perfect awareness. No, I don't believe there are microphones or cameras hidden in the walls. You think I'm stupid? The microphones and cameras are right here in the tablet I'm holding right now.. Nothing hidden anymore, it's right in front of you... permalink fedilink source parent [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) You do realize that reads like you're off your meds. I work in IT. There have definitely been several attacks on the quality of information available to the general public in the last few decades, but none that I would qualify as a singular "the" Could you be more specific on which attack (or by whom) you're referring to? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] skisnow@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago I think they're a person who's honestly in a dark place. I think they're objectively wrong about the 'Saddam being linked to 9/11' thing, and I worry that they've been a bit lost in their own head a bit. The idea that data was deleted isn't meritless in the sense that between enshittification and Musk's tech bros there's good reason to believe censorship and destruction have occurred recently (and they're only the latest in a long line of maliciously maligned actors). But I agree that their posts are so ridiculously textbook schizophrenic, that I do wonder if it's an act. Yet, nonetheless it costs me little to be kind. 😅 permalink fedilink source parent [+] fossilesque@mander.xyz [S] 1 point 1 year ago (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (5 children) GAO-04-1033T Legit info, and I'm sure that's not all.. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] fossilesque@mander.xyz [S] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (3 children) I don't trust any information about this subject, even my own info. It's all very prone to misinformation, propaganda, and general manipulation. But of all sources you'd suggest, Wikipedia? You gotta be shitting me. My sources are between the GAO (Government Accountability Office) and a hefty data dump of early years of Wikileaks. Anyways, yeah I have plenty enough reason to not trust currently available information, it's all probably been cherry picked and edited to hell and back for the modern narrative. I have much more original information. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I'm not trusting any external source here. I grew up under the Bush presidency and simply remember the whole fiasco. Bush and friends invented the link to justify their prior war plans, when pushed to prove there was a connection, Bush failed to produce evidence. You're implying Bush (or … someone?) had the evidence that would have vindicated him, but rather than share it, deliberately buried it and successfully hid it from the whole world? permalink fedilink source parent [+] fossilesque@mander.xyz [S] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago I just got done saying that I don't trust any info on this subject, even the huge archive I inherited from my late father. But I'm more inclined to trust the data from my late father, before many documents conveniently got edited, blacked out or just became missing. Anyways, I don't care what anyone thinks or can or cannot prove about Hussein, it's perfectly normal to hide in a hole in the ground if you've done nothing wrong... Oh wait.. permalink fedilink source parent [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago Also, Bin Laden was a puppet of Hussein permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] dellish@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago Dafaq? Saddam had nothing to do with it, and a vast majority of the world knew that at the time. That's why the bullshit WMD story was circulated as an excuse to attack, and still most of the world was dubious at best. permalink fedilink source parent [+] fossilesque@mander.xyz [S] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] over_clox@lemmy.world -7 points 1 year ago (4 children) Please just don't, I've got gigabytes of info on this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children) Do you realize that the damaged area of the Pentagon was way smaller than the plane that supposedly hit it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago You should make a video about this and put it on YouTube and let us know when you’re done. Use all your data permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) load more comments (1 reply)
[+] over_clox@lemmy.world -16 points 1 year ago (27 children) This is not at all a joke. Saddam Hussein orchestrated the 9/11 attack. This isn't even funny, please educate yourself. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 27 child comments replies: [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (19 children) Are you conflating Osama Bin Laden with Saddam Hussein, for whom as summarized by wikipedia: In 2003, a US-led coalition invaded Iraq, falsely accusing him of developing weapons of mass destruction and of having ties with al-Qaeda. Unless you have that evidence the world was looking for I don't want to spread old, debunked propaganda. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 19 child comments replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (16 children) Oh please, Obama wasn't even on the scene when I got the info on Osama, I definitely know the difference. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (15 children) Can you cite where Saddam is involved in 9/11? Again, it's generally accepted history that the Bush Administration claimed he supported the attacks, never presented evidence he was involved, then later admitted he was not involved. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/sep/12/september11.usa2 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 child) Also, that document was first archived in August 2013, not 2006, not 2001 https://web.archive.org/web/20130830185412/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/sep/12/september11.usa2 So please don't try to refer me to ancient shit that could have been altered over many years... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I'll stop referring to sources that could have been altered, when you start providing specifics about who you think deleted what and why? permalink fedilink source parent [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (12 children) Did you miss the mass erase of online data? My data is before the mass erase. I don't even trust modern links, they've all been tampered with. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) They're in your walls they're gonna come for you permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* Har har, you're phunny. Some say perfect paranoia is perfect awareness. No, I don't believe there are microphones or cameras hidden in the walls. You think I'm stupid? The microphones and cameras are right here in the tablet I'm holding right now.. Nothing hidden anymore, it's right in front of you... permalink fedilink source parent [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) You do realize that reads like you're off your meds. I work in IT. There have definitely been several attacks on the quality of information available to the general public in the last few decades, but none that I would qualify as a singular "the" Could you be more specific on which attack (or by whom) you're referring to? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] skisnow@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago I think they're a person who's honestly in a dark place. I think they're objectively wrong about the 'Saddam being linked to 9/11' thing, and I worry that they've been a bit lost in their own head a bit. The idea that data was deleted isn't meritless in the sense that between enshittification and Musk's tech bros there's good reason to believe censorship and destruction have occurred recently (and they're only the latest in a long line of maliciously maligned actors). But I agree that their posts are so ridiculously textbook schizophrenic, that I do wonder if it's an act. Yet, nonetheless it costs me little to be kind. 😅 permalink fedilink source parent [+] fossilesque@mander.xyz [S] 1 point 1 year ago (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (5 children) GAO-04-1033T Legit info, and I'm sure that's not all.. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] fossilesque@mander.xyz [S] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (3 children) I don't trust any information about this subject, even my own info. It's all very prone to misinformation, propaganda, and general manipulation. But of all sources you'd suggest, Wikipedia? You gotta be shitting me. My sources are between the GAO (Government Accountability Office) and a hefty data dump of early years of Wikileaks. Anyways, yeah I have plenty enough reason to not trust currently available information, it's all probably been cherry picked and edited to hell and back for the modern narrative. I have much more original information. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I'm not trusting any external source here. I grew up under the Bush presidency and simply remember the whole fiasco. Bush and friends invented the link to justify their prior war plans, when pushed to prove there was a connection, Bush failed to produce evidence. You're implying Bush (or … someone?) had the evidence that would have vindicated him, but rather than share it, deliberately buried it and successfully hid it from the whole world? permalink fedilink source parent [+] fossilesque@mander.xyz [S] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago I just got done saying that I don't trust any info on this subject, even the huge archive I inherited from my late father. But I'm more inclined to trust the data from my late father, before many documents conveniently got edited, blacked out or just became missing. Anyways, I don't care what anyone thinks or can or cannot prove about Hussein, it's perfectly normal to hide in a hole in the ground if you've done nothing wrong... Oh wait.. permalink fedilink source parent [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago Also, Bin Laden was a puppet of Hussein permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply) [–] dellish@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago Dafaq? Saddam had nothing to do with it, and a vast majority of the world knew that at the time. That's why the bullshit WMD story was circulated as an excuse to attack, and still most of the world was dubious at best. permalink fedilink source parent [+] fossilesque@mander.xyz [S] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] over_clox@lemmy.world -7 points 1 year ago (4 children) Please just don't, I've got gigabytes of info on this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children) Do you realize that the damaged area of the Pentagon was way smaller than the plane that supposedly hit it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago You should make a video about this and put it on YouTube and let us know when you’re done. Use all your data permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] TeddE@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (19 children) Are you conflating Osama Bin Laden with Saddam Hussein, for whom as summarized by wikipedia: In 2003, a US-led coalition invaded Iraq, falsely accusing him of developing weapons of mass destruction and of having ties with al-Qaeda. Unless you have that evidence the world was looking for I don't want to spread old, debunked propaganda. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 19 child comments replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (16 children) Oh please, Obama wasn't even on the scene when I got the info on Osama, I definitely know the difference. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (15 children) Can you cite where Saddam is involved in 9/11? Again, it's generally accepted history that the Bush Administration claimed he supported the attacks, never presented evidence he was involved, then later admitted he was not involved. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/sep/12/september11.usa2 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 child) Also, that document was first archived in August 2013, not 2006, not 2001 https://web.archive.org/web/20130830185412/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/sep/12/september11.usa2 So please don't try to refer me to ancient shit that could have been altered over many years... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I'll stop referring to sources that could have been altered, when you start providing specifics about who you think deleted what and why? permalink fedilink source parent [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (12 children) Did you miss the mass erase of online data? My data is before the mass erase. I don't even trust modern links, they've all been tampered with. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) They're in your walls they're gonna come for you permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* Har har, you're phunny. Some say perfect paranoia is perfect awareness. No, I don't believe there are microphones or cameras hidden in the walls. You think I'm stupid? The microphones and cameras are right here in the tablet I'm holding right now.. Nothing hidden anymore, it's right in front of you... permalink fedilink source parent [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) You do realize that reads like you're off your meds. I work in IT. There have definitely been several attacks on the quality of information available to the general public in the last few decades, but none that I would qualify as a singular "the" Could you be more specific on which attack (or by whom) you're referring to? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] skisnow@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago I think they're a person who's honestly in a dark place. I think they're objectively wrong about the 'Saddam being linked to 9/11' thing, and I worry that they've been a bit lost in their own head a bit. The idea that data was deleted isn't meritless in the sense that between enshittification and Musk's tech bros there's good reason to believe censorship and destruction have occurred recently (and they're only the latest in a long line of maliciously maligned actors). But I agree that their posts are so ridiculously textbook schizophrenic, that I do wonder if it's an act. Yet, nonetheless it costs me little to be kind. 😅 permalink fedilink source parent [+] fossilesque@mander.xyz [S] 1 point 1 year ago (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (5 children) GAO-04-1033T Legit info, and I'm sure that's not all.. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] fossilesque@mander.xyz [S] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (3 children) I don't trust any information about this subject, even my own info. It's all very prone to misinformation, propaganda, and general manipulation. But of all sources you'd suggest, Wikipedia? You gotta be shitting me. My sources are between the GAO (Government Accountability Office) and a hefty data dump of early years of Wikileaks. Anyways, yeah I have plenty enough reason to not trust currently available information, it's all probably been cherry picked and edited to hell and back for the modern narrative. I have much more original information. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I'm not trusting any external source here. I grew up under the Bush presidency and simply remember the whole fiasco. Bush and friends invented the link to justify their prior war plans, when pushed to prove there was a connection, Bush failed to produce evidence. You're implying Bush (or … someone?) had the evidence that would have vindicated him, but rather than share it, deliberately buried it and successfully hid it from the whole world? permalink fedilink source parent [+] fossilesque@mander.xyz [S] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago I just got done saying that I don't trust any info on this subject, even the huge archive I inherited from my late father. But I'm more inclined to trust the data from my late father, before many documents conveniently got edited, blacked out or just became missing. Anyways, I don't care what anyone thinks or can or cannot prove about Hussein, it's perfectly normal to hide in a hole in the ground if you've done nothing wrong... Oh wait.. permalink fedilink source parent [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago Also, Bin Laden was a puppet of Hussein permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (16 children) Oh please, Obama wasn't even on the scene when I got the info on Osama, I definitely know the difference. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 16 child comments replies: [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (15 children) Can you cite where Saddam is involved in 9/11? Again, it's generally accepted history that the Bush Administration claimed he supported the attacks, never presented evidence he was involved, then later admitted he was not involved. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/sep/12/september11.usa2 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 child) Also, that document was first archived in August 2013, not 2006, not 2001 https://web.archive.org/web/20130830185412/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/sep/12/september11.usa2 So please don't try to refer me to ancient shit that could have been altered over many years... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I'll stop referring to sources that could have been altered, when you start providing specifics about who you think deleted what and why? permalink fedilink source parent [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (12 children) Did you miss the mass erase of online data? My data is before the mass erase. I don't even trust modern links, they've all been tampered with. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) They're in your walls they're gonna come for you permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* Har har, you're phunny. Some say perfect paranoia is perfect awareness. No, I don't believe there are microphones or cameras hidden in the walls. You think I'm stupid? The microphones and cameras are right here in the tablet I'm holding right now.. Nothing hidden anymore, it's right in front of you... permalink fedilink source parent [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) You do realize that reads like you're off your meds. I work in IT. There have definitely been several attacks on the quality of information available to the general public in the last few decades, but none that I would qualify as a singular "the" Could you be more specific on which attack (or by whom) you're referring to? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] skisnow@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago I think they're a person who's honestly in a dark place. I think they're objectively wrong about the 'Saddam being linked to 9/11' thing, and I worry that they've been a bit lost in their own head a bit. The idea that data was deleted isn't meritless in the sense that between enshittification and Musk's tech bros there's good reason to believe censorship and destruction have occurred recently (and they're only the latest in a long line of maliciously maligned actors). But I agree that their posts are so ridiculously textbook schizophrenic, that I do wonder if it's an act. Yet, nonetheless it costs me little to be kind. 😅 permalink fedilink source parent [+] fossilesque@mander.xyz [S] 1 point 1 year ago (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (5 children) GAO-04-1033T Legit info, and I'm sure that's not all.. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] fossilesque@mander.xyz [S] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (3 children) I don't trust any information about this subject, even my own info. It's all very prone to misinformation, propaganda, and general manipulation. But of all sources you'd suggest, Wikipedia? You gotta be shitting me. My sources are between the GAO (Government Accountability Office) and a hefty data dump of early years of Wikileaks. Anyways, yeah I have plenty enough reason to not trust currently available information, it's all probably been cherry picked and edited to hell and back for the modern narrative. I have much more original information. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I'm not trusting any external source here. I grew up under the Bush presidency and simply remember the whole fiasco. Bush and friends invented the link to justify their prior war plans, when pushed to prove there was a connection, Bush failed to produce evidence. You're implying Bush (or … someone?) had the evidence that would have vindicated him, but rather than share it, deliberately buried it and successfully hid it from the whole world? permalink fedilink source parent [+] fossilesque@mander.xyz [S] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago I just got done saying that I don't trust any info on this subject, even the huge archive I inherited from my late father. But I'm more inclined to trust the data from my late father, before many documents conveniently got edited, blacked out or just became missing. Anyways, I don't care what anyone thinks or can or cannot prove about Hussein, it's perfectly normal to hide in a hole in the ground if you've done nothing wrong... Oh wait.. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TeddE@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (15 children) Can you cite where Saddam is involved in 9/11? Again, it's generally accepted history that the Bush Administration claimed he supported the attacks, never presented evidence he was involved, then later admitted he was not involved. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/sep/12/september11.usa2 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 15 child comments replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 child) Also, that document was first archived in August 2013, not 2006, not 2001 https://web.archive.org/web/20130830185412/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/sep/12/september11.usa2 So please don't try to refer me to ancient shit that could have been altered over many years... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I'll stop referring to sources that could have been altered, when you start providing specifics about who you think deleted what and why? permalink fedilink source parent [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (12 children) Did you miss the mass erase of online data? My data is before the mass erase. I don't even trust modern links, they've all been tampered with. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) They're in your walls they're gonna come for you permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* Har har, you're phunny. Some say perfect paranoia is perfect awareness. No, I don't believe there are microphones or cameras hidden in the walls. You think I'm stupid? The microphones and cameras are right here in the tablet I'm holding right now.. Nothing hidden anymore, it's right in front of you... permalink fedilink source parent [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) You do realize that reads like you're off your meds. I work in IT. There have definitely been several attacks on the quality of information available to the general public in the last few decades, but none that I would qualify as a singular "the" Could you be more specific on which attack (or by whom) you're referring to? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] skisnow@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago I think they're a person who's honestly in a dark place. I think they're objectively wrong about the 'Saddam being linked to 9/11' thing, and I worry that they've been a bit lost in their own head a bit. The idea that data was deleted isn't meritless in the sense that between enshittification and Musk's tech bros there's good reason to believe censorship and destruction have occurred recently (and they're only the latest in a long line of maliciously maligned actors). But I agree that their posts are so ridiculously textbook schizophrenic, that I do wonder if it's an act. Yet, nonetheless it costs me little to be kind. 😅 permalink fedilink source parent [+] fossilesque@mander.xyz [S] 1 point 1 year ago (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (5 children) GAO-04-1033T Legit info, and I'm sure that's not all.. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] fossilesque@mander.xyz [S] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (3 children) I don't trust any information about this subject, even my own info. It's all very prone to misinformation, propaganda, and general manipulation. But of all sources you'd suggest, Wikipedia? You gotta be shitting me. My sources are between the GAO (Government Accountability Office) and a hefty data dump of early years of Wikileaks. Anyways, yeah I have plenty enough reason to not trust currently available information, it's all probably been cherry picked and edited to hell and back for the modern narrative. I have much more original information. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I'm not trusting any external source here. I grew up under the Bush presidency and simply remember the whole fiasco. Bush and friends invented the link to justify their prior war plans, when pushed to prove there was a connection, Bush failed to produce evidence. You're implying Bush (or … someone?) had the evidence that would have vindicated him, but rather than share it, deliberately buried it and successfully hid it from the whole world? permalink fedilink source parent [+] fossilesque@mander.xyz [S] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago I just got done saying that I don't trust any info on this subject, even the huge archive I inherited from my late father. But I'm more inclined to trust the data from my late father, before many documents conveniently got edited, blacked out or just became missing. Anyways, I don't care what anyone thinks or can or cannot prove about Hussein, it's perfectly normal to hide in a hole in the ground if you've done nothing wrong... Oh wait.. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] over_clox@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 child) Also, that document was first archived in August 2013, not 2006, not 2001 https://web.archive.org/web/20130830185412/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/sep/12/september11.usa2 So please don't try to refer me to ancient shit that could have been altered over many years... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I'll stop referring to sources that could have been altered, when you start providing specifics about who you think deleted what and why? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TeddE@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I'll stop referring to sources that could have been altered, when you start providing specifics about who you think deleted what and why? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] over_clox@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (12 children) Did you miss the mass erase of online data? My data is before the mass erase. I don't even trust modern links, they've all been tampered with. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 12 child comments replies: [–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) They're in your walls they're gonna come for you permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* Har har, you're phunny. Some say perfect paranoia is perfect awareness. No, I don't believe there are microphones or cameras hidden in the walls. You think I'm stupid? The microphones and cameras are right here in the tablet I'm holding right now.. Nothing hidden anymore, it's right in front of you... permalink fedilink source parent [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) You do realize that reads like you're off your meds. I work in IT. There have definitely been several attacks on the quality of information available to the general public in the last few decades, but none that I would qualify as a singular "the" Could you be more specific on which attack (or by whom) you're referring to? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] skisnow@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago I think they're a person who's honestly in a dark place. I think they're objectively wrong about the 'Saddam being linked to 9/11' thing, and I worry that they've been a bit lost in their own head a bit. The idea that data was deleted isn't meritless in the sense that between enshittification and Musk's tech bros there's good reason to believe censorship and destruction have occurred recently (and they're only the latest in a long line of maliciously maligned actors). But I agree that their posts are so ridiculously textbook schizophrenic, that I do wonder if it's an act. Yet, nonetheless it costs me little to be kind. 😅 permalink fedilink source parent [+] fossilesque@mander.xyz [S] 1 point 1 year ago (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (5 children) GAO-04-1033T Legit info, and I'm sure that's not all.. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] fossilesque@mander.xyz [S] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (3 children) I don't trust any information about this subject, even my own info. It's all very prone to misinformation, propaganda, and general manipulation. But of all sources you'd suggest, Wikipedia? You gotta be shitting me. My sources are between the GAO (Government Accountability Office) and a hefty data dump of early years of Wikileaks. Anyways, yeah I have plenty enough reason to not trust currently available information, it's all probably been cherry picked and edited to hell and back for the modern narrative. I have much more original information. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I'm not trusting any external source here. I grew up under the Bush presidency and simply remember the whole fiasco. Bush and friends invented the link to justify their prior war plans, when pushed to prove there was a connection, Bush failed to produce evidence. You're implying Bush (or … someone?) had the evidence that would have vindicated him, but rather than share it, deliberately buried it and successfully hid it from the whole world? permalink fedilink source parent [+] fossilesque@mander.xyz [S] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago I just got done saying that I don't trust any info on this subject, even the huge archive I inherited from my late father. But I'm more inclined to trust the data from my late father, before many documents conveniently got edited, blacked out or just became missing. Anyways, I don't care what anyone thinks or can or cannot prove about Hussein, it's perfectly normal to hide in a hole in the ground if you've done nothing wrong... Oh wait.. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) They're in your walls they're gonna come for you permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* Har har, you're phunny. Some say perfect paranoia is perfect awareness. No, I don't believe there are microphones or cameras hidden in the walls. You think I'm stupid? The microphones and cameras are right here in the tablet I'm holding right now.. Nothing hidden anymore, it's right in front of you... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago* Har har, you're phunny. Some say perfect paranoia is perfect awareness. No, I don't believe there are microphones or cameras hidden in the walls. You think I'm stupid? The microphones and cameras are right here in the tablet I'm holding right now.. Nothing hidden anymore, it's right in front of you... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TeddE@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (2 children) You do realize that reads like you're off your meds. I work in IT. There have definitely been several attacks on the quality of information available to the general public in the last few decades, but none that I would qualify as a singular "the" Could you be more specific on which attack (or by whom) you're referring to? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] skisnow@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago I think they're a person who's honestly in a dark place. I think they're objectively wrong about the 'Saddam being linked to 9/11' thing, and I worry that they've been a bit lost in their own head a bit. The idea that data was deleted isn't meritless in the sense that between enshittification and Musk's tech bros there's good reason to believe censorship and destruction have occurred recently (and they're only the latest in a long line of maliciously maligned actors). But I agree that their posts are so ridiculously textbook schizophrenic, that I do wonder if it's an act. Yet, nonetheless it costs me little to be kind. 😅 permalink fedilink source parent
[+] skisnow@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago I think they're a person who's honestly in a dark place. I think they're objectively wrong about the 'Saddam being linked to 9/11' thing, and I worry that they've been a bit lost in their own head a bit. The idea that data was deleted isn't meritless in the sense that between enshittification and Musk's tech bros there's good reason to believe censorship and destruction have occurred recently (and they're only the latest in a long line of maliciously maligned actors). But I agree that their posts are so ridiculously textbook schizophrenic, that I do wonder if it's an act. Yet, nonetheless it costs me little to be kind. 😅 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TeddE@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago I think they're a person who's honestly in a dark place. I think they're objectively wrong about the 'Saddam being linked to 9/11' thing, and I worry that they've been a bit lost in their own head a bit. The idea that data was deleted isn't meritless in the sense that between enshittification and Musk's tech bros there's good reason to believe censorship and destruction have occurred recently (and they're only the latest in a long line of maliciously maligned actors). But I agree that their posts are so ridiculously textbook schizophrenic, that I do wonder if it's an act. Yet, nonetheless it costs me little to be kind. 😅 permalink fedilink source parent
[+] fossilesque@mander.xyz [S] 1 point 1 year ago (6 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (5 children) GAO-04-1033T Legit info, and I'm sure that's not all.. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] fossilesque@mander.xyz [S] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (3 children) I don't trust any information about this subject, even my own info. It's all very prone to misinformation, propaganda, and general manipulation. But of all sources you'd suggest, Wikipedia? You gotta be shitting me. My sources are between the GAO (Government Accountability Office) and a hefty data dump of early years of Wikileaks. Anyways, yeah I have plenty enough reason to not trust currently available information, it's all probably been cherry picked and edited to hell and back for the modern narrative. I have much more original information. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I'm not trusting any external source here. I grew up under the Bush presidency and simply remember the whole fiasco. Bush and friends invented the link to justify their prior war plans, when pushed to prove there was a connection, Bush failed to produce evidence. You're implying Bush (or … someone?) had the evidence that would have vindicated him, but rather than share it, deliberately buried it and successfully hid it from the whole world? permalink fedilink source parent [+] fossilesque@mander.xyz [S] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago I just got done saying that I don't trust any info on this subject, even the huge archive I inherited from my late father. But I'm more inclined to trust the data from my late father, before many documents conveniently got edited, blacked out or just became missing. Anyways, I don't care what anyone thinks or can or cannot prove about Hussein, it's perfectly normal to hide in a hole in the ground if you've done nothing wrong... Oh wait.. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] over_clox@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (5 children) GAO-04-1033T Legit info, and I'm sure that's not all.. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] fossilesque@mander.xyz [S] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (3 children) I don't trust any information about this subject, even my own info. It's all very prone to misinformation, propaganda, and general manipulation. But of all sources you'd suggest, Wikipedia? You gotta be shitting me. My sources are between the GAO (Government Accountability Office) and a hefty data dump of early years of Wikileaks. Anyways, yeah I have plenty enough reason to not trust currently available information, it's all probably been cherry picked and edited to hell and back for the modern narrative. I have much more original information. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I'm not trusting any external source here. I grew up under the Bush presidency and simply remember the whole fiasco. Bush and friends invented the link to justify their prior war plans, when pushed to prove there was a connection, Bush failed to produce evidence. You're implying Bush (or … someone?) had the evidence that would have vindicated him, but rather than share it, deliberately buried it and successfully hid it from the whole world? permalink fedilink source parent [+] fossilesque@mander.xyz [S] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago I just got done saying that I don't trust any info on this subject, even the huge archive I inherited from my late father. But I'm more inclined to trust the data from my late father, before many documents conveniently got edited, blacked out or just became missing. Anyways, I don't care what anyone thinks or can or cannot prove about Hussein, it's perfectly normal to hide in a hole in the ground if you've done nothing wrong... Oh wait.. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] fossilesque@mander.xyz [S] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (3 children) I don't trust any information about this subject, even my own info. It's all very prone to misinformation, propaganda, and general manipulation. But of all sources you'd suggest, Wikipedia? You gotta be shitting me. My sources are between the GAO (Government Accountability Office) and a hefty data dump of early years of Wikileaks. Anyways, yeah I have plenty enough reason to not trust currently available information, it's all probably been cherry picked and edited to hell and back for the modern narrative. I have much more original information. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I'm not trusting any external source here. I grew up under the Bush presidency and simply remember the whole fiasco. Bush and friends invented the link to justify their prior war plans, when pushed to prove there was a connection, Bush failed to produce evidence. You're implying Bush (or … someone?) had the evidence that would have vindicated him, but rather than share it, deliberately buried it and successfully hid it from the whole world? permalink fedilink source parent [+] fossilesque@mander.xyz [S] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago I just got done saying that I don't trust any info on this subject, even the huge archive I inherited from my late father. But I'm more inclined to trust the data from my late father, before many documents conveniently got edited, blacked out or just became missing. Anyways, I don't care what anyone thinks or can or cannot prove about Hussein, it's perfectly normal to hide in a hole in the ground if you've done nothing wrong... Oh wait.. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (3 children) I don't trust any information about this subject, even my own info. It's all very prone to misinformation, propaganda, and general manipulation. But of all sources you'd suggest, Wikipedia? You gotta be shitting me. My sources are between the GAO (Government Accountability Office) and a hefty data dump of early years of Wikileaks. Anyways, yeah I have plenty enough reason to not trust currently available information, it's all probably been cherry picked and edited to hell and back for the modern narrative. I have much more original information. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] TeddE@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I'm not trusting any external source here. I grew up under the Bush presidency and simply remember the whole fiasco. Bush and friends invented the link to justify their prior war plans, when pushed to prove there was a connection, Bush failed to produce evidence. You're implying Bush (or … someone?) had the evidence that would have vindicated him, but rather than share it, deliberately buried it and successfully hid it from the whole world? permalink fedilink source parent [+] fossilesque@mander.xyz [S] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago I just got done saying that I don't trust any info on this subject, even the huge archive I inherited from my late father. But I'm more inclined to trust the data from my late father, before many documents conveniently got edited, blacked out or just became missing. Anyways, I don't care what anyone thinks or can or cannot prove about Hussein, it's perfectly normal to hide in a hole in the ground if you've done nothing wrong... Oh wait.. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TeddE@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago I'm not trusting any external source here. I grew up under the Bush presidency and simply remember the whole fiasco. Bush and friends invented the link to justify their prior war plans, when pushed to prove there was a connection, Bush failed to produce evidence. You're implying Bush (or … someone?) had the evidence that would have vindicated him, but rather than share it, deliberately buried it and successfully hid it from the whole world? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] fossilesque@mander.xyz [S] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago I just got done saying that I don't trust any info on this subject, even the huge archive I inherited from my late father. But I'm more inclined to trust the data from my late father, before many documents conveniently got edited, blacked out or just became missing. Anyways, I don't care what anyone thinks or can or cannot prove about Hussein, it's perfectly normal to hide in a hole in the ground if you've done nothing wrong... Oh wait.. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] over_clox@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago I just got done saying that I don't trust any info on this subject, even the huge archive I inherited from my late father. But I'm more inclined to trust the data from my late father, before many documents conveniently got edited, blacked out or just became missing. Anyways, I don't care what anyone thinks or can or cannot prove about Hussein, it's perfectly normal to hide in a hole in the ground if you've done nothing wrong... Oh wait.. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] over_clox@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago Also, Bin Laden was a puppet of Hussein permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dellish@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago Dafaq? Saddam had nothing to do with it, and a vast majority of the world knew that at the time. That's why the bullshit WMD story was circulated as an excuse to attack, and still most of the world was dubious at best. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] fossilesque@mander.xyz [S] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [+] over_clox@lemmy.world -7 points 1 year ago (4 children) Please just don't, I've got gigabytes of info on this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children) Do you realize that the damaged area of the Pentagon was way smaller than the plane that supposedly hit it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago You should make a video about this and put it on YouTube and let us know when you’re done. Use all your data permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[+] over_clox@lemmy.world -7 points 1 year ago (4 children) Please just don't, I've got gigabytes of info on this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children) Do you realize that the damaged area of the Pentagon was way smaller than the plane that supposedly hit it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago You should make a video about this and put it on YouTube and let us know when you’re done. Use all your data permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[+] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (3 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] over_clox@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children) Do you realize that the damaged area of the Pentagon was way smaller than the plane that supposedly hit it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago You should make a video about this and put it on YouTube and let us know when you’re done. Use all your data permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] over_clox@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (2 children) Do you realize that the damaged area of the Pentagon was way smaller than the plane that supposedly hit it? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago You should make a video about this and put it on YouTube and let us know when you’re done. Use all your data permalink fedilink source parent load more comments (1 reply)
[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago You should make a video about this and put it on YouTube and let us know when you’re done. Use all your data permalink fedilink source parent
