392
Can anyone identify this colony formation? (mander.xyz)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/science_memes@mander.xyz
49 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Can you cite where Saddam is involved in 9/11? Again, it's generally accepted history that the Bush Administration claimed he supported the attacks, never presented evidence he was involved, then later admitted he was not involved.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/sep/12/september11.usa2

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Also, that document was first archived in August 2013, not 2006, not 2001

    https://web.archive.org/web/20130830185412/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2006/sep/12/september11.usa2

    So please don't try to refer me to ancient shit that could have been altered over many years...

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    Did you miss the mass erase of online data?

    My data is before the mass erase.

    I don't even trust modern links, they've all been tampered with.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    They're in your walls they're gonna come for you

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    Har har, you're phunny.

    Some say perfect paranoia is perfect awareness.

    No, I don't believe there are microphones or cameras hidden in the walls. You think I'm stupid? The microphones and cameras are right here in the tablet I'm holding right now..

    Nothing hidden anymore, it's right in front of you...

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    You do realize that reads like you're off your meds.

    I work in IT. There have definitely been several attacks on the quality of information available to the general public in the last few decades, but none that I would qualify as a singular "the"

    Could you be more specific on which attack (or by whom) you're referring to?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)
    [removed by mod]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I think they're a person who's honestly in a dark place.

    I think they're objectively wrong about the 'Saddam being linked to 9/11' thing, and I worry that they've been a bit lost in their own head a bit.

    The idea that data was deleted isn't meritless in the sense that between enshittification and Musk's tech bros there's good reason to believe censorship and destruction have occurred recently (and they're only the latest in a long line of maliciously maligned actors).

    But I agree that their posts are so ridiculously textbook schizophrenic, that I do wonder if it's an act. Yet, nonetheless it costs me little to be kind. 😅

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [+] [S] 1 point 1 year ago (6 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    GAO-04-1033T

    Legit info, and I'm sure that's not all..

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [+] [S] 1 point 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    I don't trust any information about this subject, even my own info. It's all very prone to misinformation, propaganda, and general manipulation.

    But of all sources you'd suggest, Wikipedia?

    You gotta be shitting me. My sources are between the GAO (Government Accountability Office) and a hefty data dump of early years of Wikileaks.

    Anyways, yeah I have plenty enough reason to not trust currently available information, it's all probably been cherry picked and edited to hell and back for the modern narrative.

    I have much more original information.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    I'm not trusting any external source here. I grew up under the Bush presidency and simply remember the whole fiasco.

    Bush and friends invented the link to justify their prior war plans, when pushed to prove there was a connection, Bush failed to produce evidence.

    You're implying Bush (or … someone?) had the evidence that would have vindicated him, but rather than share it, deliberately buried it and successfully hid it from the whole world?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [+] [S] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago

    I just got done saying that I don't trust any info on this subject, even the huge archive I inherited from my late father.

    But I'm more inclined to trust the data from my late father, before many documents conveniently got edited, blacked out or just became missing.

    Anyways, I don't care what anyone thinks or can or cannot prove about Hussein, it's perfectly normal to hide in a hole in the ground if you've done nothing wrong...

    Oh wait..

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent