Realistically it's more like 100 support Israel, 100 vehemently oppose it, and 200 just play along with whatever the leader says to not get kicked out of the party.
I do own a railroad. I bought it for $200. I own Reading Railroad, B&O, and I'm trying to work out a deal to acquire Short Line from my brother in exchange for Vermont Avenue.
🚨 TRADE OFFER 🚨
I get: billions of dollars worth of guns, planes, and other military equipment
You get: loads of bad press, occasional dinner with Bibi (while supplies last, no cash value, void where prohibited)
Nobody is advocating for blindly trusting data from the user.
"I have no problem living in a house of cards as I make sure to never bump against the walls."
The level of co-ordination is not even remotely comparable. If you make a post that embarrasses a big company or the state on Western social media, it usually stays up. They rarely intervene. Meanwhile in China, you have the entire state apparatus coming as one unified force after popular posts to shut down this type of talk.
This diagram is nonsense. JavaScript programmers know to simply never use == but to use === instead. Half of JavaScript is like this. Oh, there's a feature, but it behaves in a super weird way so we don't use it to avoid the weirdness.
My Chinese room theory of politics: I don't actually care whether anyone truly believes what they say. Words speak louder than thoughts and actions speak louder than words. As long as someone is useful as an implement to enacting progressive policy priorities, successful at shepherding legislation, and campaigns for the election of progressives, or can be strong-armed into doing the above three, I could not care less whether they actually believe in what they say.
"Senate Democrats are united in our support for Abdul El-Sayed, because we know he will fight for the economic interests of working families in Michigan, unlike Mike Rogers, who is a tool of Donald Trump and billionaire donors," [Chuck Schumer] said.
For once Schumer is 100% right.
The state party officials need to expel her from the party. Even if it would only have a symbolic effect they need to make clear that this is unacceptable for anyone who calls themselves a Democrat. If moderates ask progressives to "vote blue no matter who" and then turn around to endorse collaborators then they need to get the boot.
This is mostly true, China will happily treat you with sincerity and goodwill as long as you are willing to overlook what China calls its "internal affairs" and are willing to refrain from "intermeddling" with issues which it considers threatening to its "national sovereignty".
Voters have shown they don't punish candidates for election denialism. So there is no political cost to denying elections. The reason that doing that used to be taboo is that candidates thought appearing like a sore loser would turn off voters for future elections.
