you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 91 points 5 days ago (5 children)

"Senate Democrats are united in our support for Abdul El-Sayed, because we know he will fight for the economic interests of working families in Michigan, unlike Mike Rogers, who is a tool of Donald Trump and billionaire donors," [Chuck Schumer] said.

For once Schumer is 100% right.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 5 days ago (3 children)

    This coming from Schumer is honestly almost as shocking as Stevens choosing to completely burn her bridges with the Democratic Party.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 5 days ago (2 children)

    Schumer says whatever toady thing he needs to to keep his job.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    My Chinese room theory of politics: I don't actually care whether anyone truly believes what they say. Words speak louder than thoughts and actions speak louder than words. As long as someone is useful as an implement to enacting progressive policy priorities, successful at shepherding legislation, and campaigns for the election of progressives, or can be strong-armed into doing the above three, I could not care less whether they actually believe in what they say.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 5 days ago*

    At the margin, sincere belief is still better. Which is to say, Schumer should still be replaced with an actual progressive/leftist/socialist at the earliest opportunity, regardless of how he tries to pivot to act like one. I'll appreciate the cynical pivot in the interim, but that's as far as it goes.

  • source
  • parent