all 77 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 188 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (16 children)

Okay, I can give a bit of insight into why this isn't just a shitpost on behalf of Wikipedia's editors. For various important reasons, we have guidelines on article size, and while it's not hard-and-fast, 10,000 words is generally the point where most editors will start wanting to trim material from the article or branch it off into more specific subarticles. An article with more than 15,000 words should "almost certainly be divided or trimmed". For context, the article on "World War II" has 13,000 words, and that's because there are literally tens of thousands of other articles about that war containing offloaded details within details within details.

The article "False or misleading statements by Donald Trump" currently has 21,000 words. It's utterly giga-fucked compared to any other article I've ever seen on the English Wikipedia. And when e.g. the "COVID-19 pandemic" section already has the listed "further information" articles of: "COVID-19 pandemic in the United States", "COVID-19 misinformation by the United States § Trump administration", and "Communication of the Trump administration during the COVID-19 pandemic", what are you even supposed to do? It's fucking impossible.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 145 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    what are you even supposed to do?

    Easy. Break it up into separate articles.

    False or misleading statements by Donald Trump on January 1, 2025

    False or misleading statements by Donald Trump on January 2, 2025

    False or misleading statements by Donald Trump On January 3, 2025

    ...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 107 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Nah, by category could be funnier. "Statements contradicted by science", "Statements contradicted by basic economics", "Statements later directly contradicted by Trump"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    The only problem with this approach is duplication. Many statements would appear in multiple lists

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Then how about a single chronological article of every bogus statement he ever made. Then have other articles that cluster them topically and provide context?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    This it a great suggestion.

    One "Trump fact" could be referenced in multiple articles.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I'm just saying, we can make this so much more funny than a single banner at the top of a single article. We can make multiple, legitimately-needed Wikipedia articles about Donald Trump's horseshit, I want to see some wikipedia editor try and say "no not like that!"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 46 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I know you didn’t ask, but I will tell you that when I saw this post I didn’t interpret it as a criticism of Wikipedia, but of the article subject. I read “Wikipedia at it again” as a positive endorsement about telling the truth.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago

    I agree with that, and I think that one comment below has it wrong. My comment wasn't a defense as much as it was a neutral clarification for readers at home(TM). I try to offer additional context when Wikipedia stuff gets brought up on Lemmy, because 1) selfishly, I think demystifying it makes it more likely that new people try editing, and 2) with Wikipedia being a major anchor of the modern information ecosystem, it's healthier for said ecosystem if people better understand what goes into it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    When he inevitably dies of an aneurysm I hope you like have a script ready to change "is" into "was" because otherwise it's going to take forever.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 16 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Wikipedia's VisualEditor has a find-and-replace feature. But blindly using find-and-replace causes problems when you have sentences like this:

    Donald Trump, who is the current president of the United States, draws a presidential salary of $400,000.

    ...which turns into this nonsensical sentence:

    Donald Trump, who was the current present of the United States, draws a presidential salary of $400,000.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 55 points 1 year ago (16 children)
  • [–] 46 points 1 year ago (13 children)
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    It really freaks me out how if you read a transcript of one of Donald Trump's speeches it literally doesn't make any sense at all. This is a consistent pattern through and through all of his extended stream of consciousness dialogue. And yet somehow we just let him coast on by.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    You need to escape the square brackets otherwise Lemmy converts the entire thing into a link (that goes nowhere) which is just displaying as a single long string with no line breaks making it rather hard to read.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    Thanks hmm which app or browser?

    Safari iOS:

    Voyager:

    This is how I discovered Safari iOS does not make the alt-text discoverable on this server!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    This article may be too long to read and navigate comfortably

    Yeah it's definitely too long. But whose fault is that?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago

    Makes sense to have article guidelines, but I'd argue it's more of a list, documenting for history. I don't think most people would read it like a book, beginning to end, no matter the length. So it should be all-encompassing, not split up.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    in case you're wondering.. no. it's not the longest article on the english wikipedia.. but it's getting close.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] [S] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Waow, did you know that chapter 324 of the UFCW endorsed Lou Correa in the California 46 constituency of the US House of Representatives?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 20 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (20 children)

    Trump lies as often as he poops.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (14 children)

    Given how incredibly full of shit he is, I assumed he's severely constipated, and he spends hours each day squatting over the constitution, trying to take an orange dump on it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    At least some of the lower level judges fight him off it sometimes until the Supreme Court gets around to vetoing them.

    Too many Americans support the corrupt Supreme Court. Authoritarians are not scary as long as the people are not complacent.

    Unhappy with corporate democrats and fascists republicans, do something about them. Or else the bite will hurt more over time. The global boycotts and criticisms will strengthen, doesn’t matter if Vance gets in and tries to pretend to be a good crook cop, the damage is done.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    It's going to take the USA decades to recover from the damage trump has inflicted in just the last 10 months, and it won't start to heal until he's either in jail or dead.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I wouldn’t spend money on their economy until they have improved substantially from before Trump’s second term. Joe Biden was too easy on him, he’s no Lula that’s for sure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I legitimately was surprised that Biden didn't pardon the Jan 6 traitors himself to "let the nation heal" .

    If Democrats don't start fighting back against the Republicans instead of trying to take the high road then we are all fucked.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    That's assuming we ever recover at all. That's a really big if.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Unless the Republican Party is considered toxic to the mainstream it won't get better. Will definitely get worse especially since the mainstream thinks its the Dems who are the problem.

    Fools they are. How is it not obvious the GOP is causing permanent dehydration? America is an embarrassment and is rapidly losing its status as the world leader and it is all because of Donald Trump and his blatant evil!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Their base is just... Too stupid to see through the bullshit. They'll eat anything shovel-fed to them by their trusted news. It even forces churches to the right, when they should lean left. These people trust Jessie waters and Greg guttfeld more than their own spiritual leaders unless they say the same thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    What does the Supreme Court even have to gain. They already have their damn seats and their damn fruit, apples, grapes, even some lemons. Tasty hydrating fruit, wash it down with a new hydrating Volvic Revive, the wild mineral water that hydrates you until you poop sideways!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    I don't think comfort was ever a consideration.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    If it's true, what's the problem?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    Sheesh, stop putting all the responsibility onto Wikipedia and host it externally, there's no shortage of hosts they can link to as a reference from there. F- ing hell, trying to lay shit onto one of the most open and needed sites on the Internet like if you were Elon Musk.. they are already getting enough pressure from the US administration & associates.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Well obviously this is the reason Rafael Cruz has come out against Wikipedia recently. He just wants tighter articles and more conciseness in describing the dishonesty of his God-King. Over-verbosity is the devils work, after all.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    This could be replaced by three words: 'All of them.'

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    A better list would be statements he said that are accurate. It definitely wouldn't be too long to comfortably read.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Is it meant to be read, though? I'd just search for keywords in the article to find whichever lie I was interested in confirming.

    Also, is 21,000 words really that many? The story I'm just about finished writing for fun is at 140K words. I'm starting my fourth read-through for editing. It's not that big of a deal. I guess people don't read anymore?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 12 points 1 year ago

    Also, is 21,000 words really that many? The story I'm just about finished writing for fun is at 140K words. I'm starting my fourth read-through for editing. It's not that big of a deal. I guess people don't read anymore?

    Allow me to poke some fun at this.

    Also, is a 1,000 calorie cupcake really that many? The wedding cake I just finished baking is at 25,000 calories. This is the fourth one I've made. It's not that big of a deal. I guess people don't eat anymore?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago*

    I guess people don’t read anymore?

    You hopefully saw that I linked the article size guidelines above alongside the 21,000 words figure. That page is only 1700 words, so feel free to give it a read and see if it soothes your curiosity for why we have them (definitely feel free to ask if any claims made seem dubious or terminology is unclear).

    Keep in mind that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and that this singular "article" represents nearly 50 pages of prose in 12-point, single-spaced print – the size of a novella. Wikipedia articles are meant to be encyclopedic treatments of their subjects, not dissertations on them.

    Edit: just checked, and the "Download as PDF" of this article is 153 pages long.

  • source
  • parent