top 79 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 107 points 4 months ago (15 children)

It doesn’t help my hope for things that, every time Carney clearly represents the owner class over the working class, I see people in comment sections talking about they “don’t like it but you gotta get things done!”. No, this is bad and should not be excused, and why do we always have to have excuses and patience for centrist and right-wing bullshit, which has still yet to show any real functionality, but we won’t even try being progressive despite the innumerable examples of progressive policy working all over the world? Even Mamdani is making it work in the US and we act like Carney needs to allow unreviewed distruction of our environment to benefit O&G companies or the whole country will up and die in only a couple years’ time.

I’m so tired of this crap. I’m so tired of us willfully throwing away our rights and self-respect just to get leaders who will ignore us at every possible turn. I’m sick of people saying that the left will be like Soviet Russia while everything they describe as guaranteed with progressivism is literally happening, openly, in front of them under conservative governments(like our current one, too). Degrading our democracy almost feels like it’s still democratic because so much of the population seems perfectly happy to watch it happen.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 4 months ago

    I am not far left enough to say communism is the right goal, yet, but I am further left than saying we need socialist reforms. I am from Saskatchewan so I can see the benefits of psuedo-socialized markets (think phone and internet with Sasktel sticking it to the big 3) I just wish the rest of the province could see it to. If Saskatchewan can see it and really start celebrating it maybe the rest of Canada could as well.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Many jobs SHOULD be public sector jobs. Like water utilities, garbage collection, electrical utilities, teaching, college teacher.

    These public sector jobs should be 4 days a week, with a 5th day of retraining/training. So people keep gaining more skills encase technology changes the workforce, and make peoples' lives more meaningful.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    The fifth day should just be free, with training being offered during portions of the year for everyone or as a system similar to, but separate from, vacation days. Imagine a couple weeks in the year where everyone gets together for training or a fairly generous pool of training days to take from and an approved list of courses.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 4 months ago (10 children)

    I'm 100% behind you with this.

    And every time I mentioned how it was a bad idea to vote for Carney and how bad he is, I kept being downvoted and then people comment "yeah but we would've has Poilievre otherwise."

    No we wouldn't. A lot of NDP ridings turned red because of this. But people should have voted for the NDP. With them as a strong opposition, we would still be in a better position in a minority big C Conservative government than we are right now with a majority small c conservative government.

    Carney is a corporatist. He knows how to sweet talk investors to gain their trust like any CEO can bullshit people into buying their stock. And he's done that with all of Canada.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 4 months ago (9 children)

    Be careful what you wish for...

    we would still be in a better position in a minority big C Conservative government than we are right now with a majority small c conservative governent.

    You might not have been aware of the full stakes and nuances of the situation in late 2024, early 2025. At around December 2024, Trudeau was so unpopular that Poilievre was in clear majority territory, not minority if an election were held then.

    This is more a matter of opinion, and I agree what we have is not a great situation, but do you really think that having Pierre in charge, with a cabinet of emboldened racists and a coalition of a group of conservative Liberals would be better than this? Metaphorically I see it as having Pierre in the driver's seat with Liberals with them in the front and the NDP backseat driving in the opposition, versus Mark in the front, with the NDP and the Cons together in the back with PP unable to find a compelling message.

    Plus, getting Lewis to unapologetically push left-wing ideas for us I think is a better strategy than Singh's centre-left conciliatory approach that had exhausted its usefulness. The orange wipeout was, rightfully IMO, a wakeup call for the Canadian left.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (8 children)

    ...the Singh centre-left got lots of stuff done in Canada like a dental plan.

    The left needs simpler ideas, like 'we'll just hire your kids right out of trade school, and give them a job building 500,000 social housing units' so they can make money and get experience'.
    The left also needs to get tough on crime. Get rid of the violence in prisons by making them safe, but put lots more people behind bars.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (7 children)

    Agreed with your first and second points, crime definitely is a separate discussion, I'm mixed on that.

    Recall that I wrote "...had exhausted its usefulness", implying it was good, but unlikely to be as effective going forward.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    The police forces are controlled by very right wing people, they don't put any energy into causes that they don't like, like loud and reckless driving cars.
    It would be good to make the police forces more responsive to the communities they serve, but the left has no interest. Legalize drugs, make they only available through license sellers...and go after the unauthorized seller very very very hard, because those people don't care about you, or making Canada better.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    but the left has no interest.

    You mean the centrist liberals right? Progressives are 100% on board with changing the way law enforcement is done, top to bottom. Its a core of their platform.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    Progressives are 100% on board with changing the way law enforcement is done

    The left can't communicate what it wants law enforcement to be.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Actually they have. Many times. They mainly want to defund the police and use these funds for other social programs meant to reduce crime overall. Social housing is one of them. Legalizing drugs, sex work, increasing wages to allow people to afford their basic needs like shelter and food, providing better access to mental health services and social workers, etc.

    Conservatives on the other hand want the opposite. They want to defund everything else and give it all to the cops who are just going to beat up and arrest people who are clearly in need of help. Can't afford shelter? Camp in a park. But that's illegal. Can't afford food? Steal it. But that's illegal. Can't get mental health? Go in full mental breakdown and use illegal drugs to try and self medicate. But that's illegal.

    Get the point?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Defunding the police and using that money legalize all drugs...is an idealist plan that won't end well. Police reform sure, legalized drugs sure. But some explanation between the two positions needs to be thought through.

    About 10% of society is made up of people that are evil, like to pull wings of flies, kick dogs, laugh at handicapped people. The left has no way of dealing with them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 4 months ago

    Ah I see, its all the out of power progressives fault. Darn those progressives. Powerless and maligned but completely at fault for the abuses of leadership.

    Aslo you frame it as if it was simply a problem of progressives communicating what centrists and the right just somehow cant see, or the centrists and right being willing to listen.

    Could it be the centrists and right know exactly what the problems are and choose not to address them?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 4 months ago

    Democracy in the entire west is eroding.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 4 months ago (20 children)

    And Canadians don't have the same excuses to not do anything about it unlike the muricans. Their healthcare is not tied to their jobs.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 4 months ago* (4 children)

    Their healthcare is not tied to their jobs.

    sure, if you dont care about your teeth, eyes, mental health, physiotherapy....

    All tied to employment...

    And before anyone jumps in here with "at least not as bad as america!!!".... thats exactly the kind of low bar thinking that landed us in this situation..

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago

    And before anyone jumps in here with “at least not as bad as america!!!”… thats exactly the kind of low bar thinking that landed us in this situation…

    Well, look at the bright side: at least you don't yet have to compare your country with North Korea like Americans do to make it seem less bad.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    OK. I broke and dislocated my shoulder in 2024. I was in emergency for a while. My open reduction and internal fixation on the left proximal humerus was scheduled fairly quickly. I didn’t have to take out a mortgage for the surgery. I wasn’t financially ruined to get the use of my arm back. If you want teeth, eyes, mental health, and physiotherapy? Be prepared to pay way higher taxes! Your choice….

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (13 children)

    No, but it is tied to politics. What treatments Canadians have access to is determined by unaccountable appointed bureaucrats at the ministries of health.

    As an example, GLP-1 is only available to Canadians who are diagnosed with diabetes. It is not available for general weight loss.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    You can get the prescription for weight loss in Canada, especially if your current weight puts you at risk. I already know a few people taking the generic for this purpose. Insurance companies are the ones that refuse to provide coverage for anything other than diabetes treatment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    In the US anyone can decide they want to take the drug and just go to one of the websites that advertise all over the place and get a prescription with no issues.

    In Canada, if your current weight does not put you at risk but you would still prefer to lose some weight, you’ll have to convince your doctor who may refuse you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (7 children)

    The two aren't comparable. You really want Doug Ford to decide what and who can be eligible for what treatments, only to have it overturned by the next premier?

    Unelected, nonpartisan bureaucracy is what prevents those swings.

    But you're not wrong - Ford is smothering healthcare, as seen by the hospitals struggling with finances right now. Its a problematic sign if most of the major hospitals are all struggling at the same time. Less funds mean poorer service and less availability, and that part is directly driven by politics in the longrun.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    You really want Doug Ford to decide what and who can be eligible for what treatments, only to have it overturned by the next premier?

    No, the total opposite. I think the government regulation of medicine should be limited to ensuring a drug’s safety, but not efficacy. This was the regime we had decades ago that gave us some of the most useful medications we still have, such as NSAIDs, antibiotics, and many vaccines.

    Let me, an individual, decide (along with my doctor) which drugs I should or shouldn’t be taking.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    but not efficacy

    that's how you get snake oil

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (2 children)

    you make an adulterous and valid point. godsdamn curing ourselves by poisoning ourselves to death.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 55 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

    Excellent article. Thanks for posting.

    Trudeau's failure to bring in proportional representation will be a missed opportunity with severe consequences that most don't fully appreciate.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    This this this. So much this. Canadians do not understand just how catastrophic of a fuckup that was. The consequences of that have not yet been truly felt but it will be horrendous when they are. Canada's electoral system is a goddamn joke and, in my opinion, is barely even a democracy at all because of it.

    Just like the US, we are one 51% vote away from a bad actor gaining absolute power and tearing down everything Canadians have known and loved. Hell, even right now we have a majority government that the people did not vote for.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Our system is better than the US’s system. By just a hair but it is better, but yes we need election reform.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    Literally the argument the article is criticizing. Don't compare one country to another like that. Sure you can take specific examples of how something doesn't work in certain circumstances, but doing a direct compare just to say "At least we're not as bad as ____" is ultimately defeatist.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 4 months ago*

    "Every crisis is an opportunity"

    -- Every single slimy "liberal" politician who is really just a posh autoritarian with a toolbox of Identity Politics slogans.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 4 months ago

    Actually, this is not about Canada, this is about the world. And it’s frightening: https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=Fd-_VDYit3U&ra=m

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago

    It’s happening all across the west

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Democracy IS THE COMPROMISE.

    The alternative is a nonstop threat of violence that makes the "Wild West" look like a monk's retreat.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago* (7 children)

    UK and Germany's too. Hungary, France, Denmark and Italy also not in great shape. Anywhere there's heavy zionist genocider influence campaigns. Coincidence maybe. Spain and Ireland are doing great as an anti-pattern.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    The richest man in the world does a Nazi salute and you think "it must be the Jews behind all of the problems"?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago

    They weren't taking about "the Jews". They were talking about genocidal, racest, apartidests that are interfering in other countries elections.

    You don't have to get pissy because they didn't list everyone in that category.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    High chance Elon is pro-Israel. It's a symptom, not the disease.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • They all are... That's the actual goal as we move forward to a new age of complete human ownership via technology attached to government.

    The idea of Nation is transitioning out.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago
    [–] 9 points 4 months ago (10 children)

    I actually voted for Mark Carney out of pure fear of what PP would do. But I had no idea it would still turn out this bad.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Mark Carney has spent 24-7 meeting with European countries, creating new trade deals, alleviating the dependence we have on the country that is calling us the “51st state”. I’m down with that :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago

    He also has been cozying up to the most insane US companies, too. His problem with the US is only that he wants Canada to remain nominally independent while still basically being a fully owned asset of US corporate interest.

    In short, its Trump's wording he is opposed to more than anything. The moment the fucker dies is the moment it is business as usual in his mind.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 child)

    I voted Pierre because the current government intends to criminalize nearly a million people, myself included, for firearms we purchased legally and have been available to the Canadian market since the 70’s.

    Say what you want about firearms, the money put into Bill C21 could’ve gone into mental health awareness or increased the budget to the firearms program & RCMP detachments performing background checks, hell I think an improved Canadian Firearms Safety Course is about due with stricter requirements.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -1 points 4 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Fiscal policies? The guy is basically gutting everything in favor of his rich buddies. You think Doug's fatass privatization of healthcare is alone to him.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 4 months ago (2 children)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 2 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    I'm a bit put off by our rating now placing behind Brazil as I'm pretty sure in practical terms Canada is still more Democratic in many aspects. Does it mean we're not sliding? I'm certain we are,but I think methodology might be flawed and as a result we've got sensational-ish content.

    TBF - yes democracy is sliding in Canada, just look at recent government moves i Quebec and Alberta as a sample. Meaning we have to fight for it at the polls and on the streets. It's far from "game over" but it could be at some point.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    I’m pretty sure in practical terms Canada is still more Democratic in many aspects

    I'm not as familiar with either system as you seem to be. What is it about Brazilian politics that makes you feel Canada is more democratic?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (2 children)

    we can start with favellas which have no equivalent in Canada (treatment of indigenous people is a separate issue and looks to be similarly bad in both cases). Then we can look at Brazilian latest election scandals etc. which have no equivalents in modern Canadian elections. Then we can look at corruption levels in politics.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago* (1 child)

    So the favelas are bad, obviously, but I don't quite see the relation to democracy. They're certainly an indicator of poverty, but I'm not entirely sure what they indicate regarding democracy.

    Then we can look at Brazilian latest election scandals etc.

    I don't really know about these scandals, but when I think about other scandals surrounding elections, they're not necessarily an indictment of the democratic system itself, right? I mean, Trump clearly disputed the election results of the 2020 election, but does that mean the election was unfair? But in all honesty, I haven't looked at their latest election scandals, and you seem to have looked at it, so maybe you know better. What was the latest election scandal?

    Then we can look at corruption levels in politics.

    I suppose we could. Did you? Is it worse in Brazil?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago

    favella dwellers are people with virtually no rights, i.e. no "democracy" for them, fact that someone would weaponize democratic processes to get rid of democracy is the problem with latest scandals. In terms of corruption, anecdotally I hear stories from (ex)Brazilians that I cannot draw parallels to in Canada

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›