"You can't reason a person out of a situation they didn't use reason for to begin with" is a lesson everyone learns eventually...
post
The earth is procedurally generated around my surroundings and is simulated on the backend everywhere else.
For optimization reasons, only the slice you currently look at is actually computed completely, the rest is just approximated. That's why closing your eyes when you're about to crash into something actually helps: chances are in the lower approximation, you'll just clip through the wall a bit.
Yeah but that's because you're the main character, the rest of us just have to deal with low LoD :(
The meter doesn't work :(
She cannot win, he will not hear at all; The planet keeps on being spherical.
Sie erklärt und tut es kund,
dass selbst wenn er sich weigert,
die Erde bleibt trotz allem rund.
He claims the Earth is as flat as a lasagna
I guess that's what happens when there's three balls on ya
She cannot win, he factually will not hear her great woids; The planet earth is actually an oblate spheroid
I actually thought the last word was "flat" but I guess I misread it the first time 😵💫 completely changes the tone.
One way, it's like it doesn't matter what ignoramuses believe—reality is what it is; the other way it's like the powerful make the reality through force.
What are the stars? They are bits of fire a few kilometres away.
We could reach them if we wanted to. Or we could blot them out.
The earth is the centre of the universe. The sun and the stars go round it.
For certain purposes, of course, that is not true. When we navigate the ocean, or when we predict an eclipse, we often find it convenient to assume that the earth goes round the sun and that the stars are millions upon millions of kilometres away.
But what of it?
Do you suppose it is beyond us to produce a dual system of astronomy?
The stars can be near or distant, according as we need them.
Do you suppose our mathematicians are unequal to that?
Have you forgotten doublethink?
I think having the final word be "flat" makes it so much better. It opens up the poem to a much wider set of interpretations. There's yours, but you can also derive this statement about male dominance in hetero relationships, for example.
Oh yeah totally, the poem is already so gendered.
The "he" and "she" lend themselves to commenting on cishet dynamics, patriarchy; related incumbent power structures in the way "he" in the poem dismisses "her" arguments and tone and just waits her out.
It reminds me so much of the toxic relationships I know of where the woman's perspective is viewed as emotional, radical, and so not privileged with serious consideration.
I once had an elder coworker who said all the dinosaurs died in Noah's great flood. I'd try reasoning with him but ultimately it was way more fun to ask him if god could create a rock that he couldn't lift.
I think with people so entrenched in a silly opinion its way more fun to identify their most absurd belief and mock them relentlessly for it. I think for flat earthers its "so where does the air and water go when it falls off?"
I used to work with a guy who was also a Methodist pastor. Most of our conversations were perfectly normal and fine, but every once in a while he would be like, "So where do you think the government is hiding the nephilim fossils?"
Or ask if round earth is a massive conspiracy, what's the angle? How does getting people to believe in a flat earth rather than a round one serve an agenda to the point where even a simple test that could prove the flatness always "goes wrong"? And if they say that the experimenters get threatened or something, why do they generally remain as confused flat earthers afterwards? If they were going to be threatened, why half-ass it and let them continue pushing flat earth instead of making them change sides?
I tend to find people who are a bit crazy/conspiracy brained tend to easily accept other people's motives as being insane as their own reasoning.
Similar to how one can't logic themselves into a position they fought against logic to get into, I don't think people can usually empathize their way out of a position they fought against empathy to get into.
Imo that's why ridicule is maybe more effective even though it will entrench some of them. The conspiracy aspect is hardest to explain with raw quantity though. Its like "there are like 10-20 million people in america who interface with NASA and plane pilots and like 200 million americans who interact with airlines and can vouch for every flight path, you think all these people are all in cahoots?" Because getting like 10 people to all show up a job and work together on a day is tough business. Getting 10,000 million+ together to play an elaborate prank for 500 years would cost more than the GDP of planet earth.
evolution doesnt contradict the Bible The Bible says Earth and humans were created in 7 days but those are 7 days for God, and we dont know how long a day is for God, and it was written before the 24 hour system
There's people out there that think everything written in the King James version of the bible are literally true and allegories do not exist. A day is 24 hours to them. A year is 365 days. Nothing is ever lost in translation or merely a human trying to put words to something they don't fully understand.
They refuse to comprehend that it could be any other way.
Wendy Cope has a healthy way to cope with frustrating interactions, I see. Maybe I should start writing poems too, when I run into human shapes brick walls.
I assume this is in grade school between kids. If you're looking for a girlfriend this will not work. If you're a husband and would like some romance this will not work.
Y'all are all crazy, clearly the earth is a donut!!!!
Tap for spoiler
In all seriousness, after some point gotta realize that you can’t use logic to convince them
Lmao, I am going to piss so many people off with this. Thank you for sharing it!
all 50 comments