I 100% guarantee that "deactivated" cameras are still operational. It's just not the City getting the data.
post
Fun fact the panel, inverter, and battery set up in these do not have any tracking features, that's all in the internals for the camera controller. It's enough to charge any smart phone or tablet if someone you know is living outside and should have a need of that. You do not need anything more than a Philips head screwdriver for most versions, and a security bit for others, both of which you can have for pennies at any hardware store.
Some flock stuff has microphones so avoid talking during the maintenance session 😜
If you cut the solar panel wire at night, no one will know when it happened.
Charge controllers detect open circuit connections, so it will very likely be in a log when suddenly the controller has an open circuit on the input terminals.
They also include SIM cards that come with a Flock-funded data plan.
Bring an all metal tool box to put the camera in it. Instant faraday cage.
Best to open it somewhere that is not frequented by you though, then you can remove the battery and other useful stuff for recycling.
Or just throw the whole thing in the nearest dumpster and let the garbage company take care of it.
I guess the problem starts when two other cameras are watching the same area the first camera is in.
One step away from being relocated to their actual destination: the bin.
honestly idk why they bothered covering them. just disconnect them... as long as they aren't damaged I doubt flock could seek anything on it.
likely safer if they ever get caught. it's not damaging property if there's simply a trash bag over it.
They have solar panels and batteries, they aren't connected to anything.
They're connected to a pole.
You can 100% remove them with a baseball bat.
Why aren't they just... Removing them?
Oh. Its probably because removing them is unnecessarily complicated so they need the company to come do it for them.
You don't have to worry about a complicated removal if you have an angle grinder.
If you had read the article you'd know that the cities aren't sure if they can remove them under the terms of their contracts with flock. So they're covering them while working that out.
I've heard the excuse that they're private property so they can't. They're not hard to remove though. They're usually just attached to poles with pipe clamps.
I'm not so sure about that because even if they are privately owned, that doesn't mean they have the inherent right to be mounted on a city pole. The property isnt harmed by removing them from the pole and storing them in a deep underground bunker infested with Hanta Virus rats, black widows, and alligators.
If I remember correctly the agreement is some kind of lease, so the city/county doesn't really own them after they are installed.
Do also the other thing, where you brake it apart. Same thing, but it's permanently.
I read the beginning of the title as "Cities are Cowering" and now I think it could easily be a part of an alternate title.
Like your the damn government... Just remove the devices, tell Flock where they can pick them up in the next two weeks otherwise they will be sold as is on open market and pay the termination fee or potential lawsuit. Cities get sued like all the time and I am confident even a moderately competent lawyer could find a cheap way out.
the city was sharing Flock camera data for immigration enforcement
Ah, these are in American cities.
apparently on accident,
Oh yes, definitely American.
(Yes I know I skipped over the part about Ohio)
This is an better idea. I was going to shoot them with a paintball gun.
iirc, paintball marker is slightly translucent, right? So maybe like...a sticker?
Some of the cameras by me are a little high up, which is why initially I thought paintball.
I bet I could fly a drone with a trash bag over it though.
I'd like to think that the bag is step 1. Step 2 is to balance an old car tire on top, and set it on fire.
I love the theatrics of it, but surely something less polluting can achieve the same results
- City installs trash bags because they're contractually obligated to keep the devices installed and powered on
- Someone hosts an impromptu Office Space fan meetup, with a fun reenactment of the printer scene
- City sees this, responds with an obvious but legally non-actionable tweet response suggesting it continue (e.g. "Fartsburg loves Mike Judge films, too! So nice to see our citizens enjoying the various forms of recreation and socialization ths city has to offer."), along with some conspicuously-placed garbage cans near all of the cameras' installed locations.
- ???
- (No) Profit. (for Flock)
Trash bags just do that sometimes...
Isn't this a problem that a can of spray paint can solve?
Use spray on flex seal instead, and go with the black one. It sticks better, and it can only be noticed by the lack of reflection from the lens. The police are unlikely to notice, because they rarely use flock by checking a specific camera (they typically just search the whole system for specific vehicles, from a map view), and if no one reports it it can go unfixed indefinitely
Or
Put a fucking bullet in it. Or ~100. Birdshot should do nicely.
Sure, but then it's a lot easier to notice it's broken. It also makes a lot of noise, shooting a gun; a spray can is near silent.
It also can't be cleaned off as fast as paint, and costs more to replace.
Be the change you want to see
Article reminded me that some people say "by accident" (me) and some say "on accident" (my cousins).
I'm surprised Dayton is doing even that. It's a low bar, sure, but it's also Dayton.
I wonder how safe the poles are, compared to well tested road signs that are up. Those easily break off when hit. Will you end up with a solar panel through your windshield in an accident? I feel like one good lawsuit could make Flock have to replace every one of them if a lawyer can convince 12 people that they are a physical danger.
News to me. I wonder when, if ever, I will see this in real life.
You don't have any trash bags?
I've never seen anyone covering Flock cameras nor have I ever seen an average person break a minor law without severe live-ruining repercussions. I have only ever heard of rich people breaking major laws without repercussions.
You don't hear about it because they haven't been caught. Then again, we're talking about covering up a camera... 🤔
Wear a mask and clothing you have never been seen in before that you can dispose of afterward. Maybe use stilts so they'll be looking for a really tall fucker.
One can also purchase aerosol can extension poles for use with spray paint.
If it’s already paid for might as well use them, what a waste of tax dollars. Or at least hit them with a bat and break them if you actually plan on not using them anymore. Covering them with plastic bags allows them to walk it back whenever they feel like it.
So tired of local officials that are so disdainful of protests against their corrupt actions that they’ve willingly and gleefully gone into the ridiculously cartoonish fascism part of capitalism that all the books warned us about. Sorry you don’t like the people who show up to your town halls and city planning meetings, but your job is to listen and if you don’t like it, go be corrupt somewhere else, there’s obviously plenty of options.
So I'm going to guess you didn't read the article....but in this ONE specific case it's actually the police and city covering the cameras until they're removed. The residences were pissed about data to ice...
Fuck flock fuck Ice and fuck anyone supporting these Nazis

no comments (yet)