top 98 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 151 points 5 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 88 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Time to crack open a cold one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 88 points 5 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 74 points 5 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 68 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    I've posted this comic a frightening amount in the last few weeks.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 46 points 5 months ago (6 children)

    If a woman isn’t insatiable for me I’m not interested

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    Sounds like you just don't know how to satisfy 🤷‍♀️

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    It's a lot less effort to satisfy someone who wishes to be satisfied.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    An audible sigh followed by "Fine" or "Sure" = Yes

    But the lack of enthusiasm really kills the mood.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago*

    If you're at that point, often, repeatedly... unless you're with an Ace, your relationship is either over or wholly performative.

    Probably best that you realize that.

    IMO, consenting but unenthusiastic sex is worse than none, you should both have more respect for yourselves and either talk out what's really bothering one or both of you, or just admit that you don't even like each other.

    The sort of converse of this is that if you do actually want to have sex with someone, but tell them you don't, or never directly say yes... yeah you need to learn how to communicate directly instead of vaguely through extremely non objective innuendo.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (6 children)

    Pfft, a simple "Yes" is not exactly enthusiastic consent. I need enthusiastic consent before I even send the first message.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    If it's not "Gee golly willikers, yes! Yes! A thousand times yes!" with stars in her eyes while she's farting rainbows, then it's a no. /s

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    Uh, how many hues do you need in your rainbow because I found just the right gal for you except her rainbow is all red and made of blood. She's farting blood.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 29 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    Technically, humans are animals so this basically rules out everything except corpses and sentient plants, fungi, and inanimate objects.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 5 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago

    Ok but she's not going to say no because of the implication.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    But only if the person has consented to it during their life. Some people are now arranging things, so that necrophiles can have one happy moment in their life at least "the proper way", some allegedly going even further and letting their bodies to be preserved for sex purposes. While it makes me go "eww", at least it's not something like parents letting pedophiles to rape their kids, not the animal stuff, etc..

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    Yeah i have some questions about the animal one...

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    I used to go to church at this cult and people are weird. There was this kid there (he's okay now but like, we all grow up a little twisted) who was always making jokes about putting peanut butter on his nethers and having his dog lick it off. One day someone must have reported the jokes and that was the last time (thank gods) we heard them, despite months of telling him that was fucked up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago

    Some people think animals can consent, it's just "non-verbal". Best you can get is sometimes you'll have to restrain (or drug) an animal in heat less. In reality, that's like if pedophilia was okay if the child was teen and extremely horny, in reality teens are more often targeted than pre-pubescent kids, and they also groomed with sexual and/or romantic favors.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 5 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 17 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    I feel like you're allowed to hesistate and still say a "yes" yes, especially since the "threatened and then said yes" is separate on this. It can be complicated and thought over first, no?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    They would have done better to make it more about talking someone into it or pestering them than about "hesitation". Maybe "reluctant" would have been better.
    Sometimes people need to do a little internal status check. "I had a headache all day, am I not feeling it or would it be a fun alternative to ibuprofen?"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 5 months ago

    Is this about website cookies?

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    I might get hate for this, but you can still consent when you're drunk, so long as you're not like barely conscious drunk or you're not being manipulated coerced by someone.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah, as an alcoholic, I don’t think every sexual encounter I’ve had in the past decade or more was mutual rape.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    If both are drunk, neither can rape and it is kind of seen like animals fucking naturaly. You both wake up as non-animals and are horrified by the ugly person on the other side that you fucked.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    Okay, but the line about "bribed" doesn't sit right with me. We doing SWERF stuff now?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 5 months ago

    Bribes are given as a form of coercion, if it's legit sex work than no bribe is given and both parties are consenting. Just giving someone money or good in trade for a service isn't a bribe.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago

    Depends on. If it's someone who actually wants to do it, then it's not a bribe. However if someone doesn't want to be a sex worker gets money (or workplace promotion, toys, candies) offered for sex does constitute as bribing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

    Is considering sex work generally non-consensual a SWERF thing? I’d guess most people who think that don’t at all want to exclude sex workers…it’s not a criticism of sex workers. I also don’t think it precludes that some people might not have a coercive experience with sex work. Im sure there are plenty of people selling feet pics on instagram and feeling great about it, and maybe that's fine...but I don't think that's the norm!

    Maybe I’m wrong though; I don’t intend to be a swerf, but I do think sex work is generally non-consensual. Most paid work is probably non-consensual on some level but I think sex kind of has a special place in non-consensual activity.

    Sex work is obviously something many people feel forced into. 73% of sex workers have at least one disability; maybe they feel they have other options, but it looks like that's not most people's experience: https://www.ctvnews.ca/vancouver/article/nearly-3-in-4-sex-workers-live-with-a-disability-rare-bc-report-finds/

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 30 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    Danger: Please don't give anyone the idea that the only way for men to get lucky with a woman is via murder.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 5 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago

    So what does it mean when he says, "That's an extra $150"? Is that a yes?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago*

    I’m going to scroll through this whole comment section and not see a single Sexy Losers reference, aren’t I?

    Edit: bjoern’s restored my faith in shitposting.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    Ask Trump or anyone that went to Epstein's island and they'll say they never heard no and even if they heard no they didn't understand it and still did whatever they wanted.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 5 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago

    So when I'm dead I'm consenting to have my likeness used

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    Tf you mean yes?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago
    [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    Must've been the wind

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›
    9 comments in c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world view that post