Louisiana's Republican governor issued an order on Thursday suspending his state's US House primaries to allow lawmakers to draw up a new congressional map, citing the Supreme Court's decision earlier this week that gutted Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.

Gov. Jeff Landry published his executive order just as early voting was set to begin in Louisiana's congressional primaries—and after some absentee ballots had already been cast. The order states that the US House primaries are "suspended for the duration of the May 16, 2026 and June 27, 2026 election cycles and until July 15, 2026 or until such time as determined by the Legislature," which is instructed to "pass legislation to enact new congressional maps."

The order was met with immediate alarm and outrage. Joel Payne, spokesperson for MoveOn Civic Action, said that "Republicans are colluding in broad daylight to try to rig the electionand silence Black voters."

"The MAGA court made their decision to gut voting rights just in the nick of time for Louisiana Republicans to postpone the scheduled primaries to slice and dice voting maps to pick and choose voters of their liking," said Payne. "MoveOn members will fight like hell against MAGA’s extreme power play in Louisiana and push for stronger voting rights to ensure we the people have the final say in our elections.”

Heather Williams, president of the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee (DLCC), said the conservative-dominated Supreme Court has "opened the floodgates for racial gerrymandering in states across the South" with its decision in Louisiana v. Callais, which severely narrowed the 1965 Voting Rights Act's protections against racial discrimination.

"Even in ruby red states, Republicans see the writing on the wall that voters will hold them accountable for soaring costs this November, which is why they’re rigging the system to dodge accountability," said Williams. "The DLCC stands with Louisiana Democrats in their fight against Republicans’ egregious actions to suppress votes, and the mission to transform the landscape of state legislative power has never mattered more."

The Washington Post reported that Landry, an ally of President Donald Trump who took office in 2024, privately notified Republican US House candidates on Wednesday that he planned to suspend the Louisiana primaries.

"A new Louisiana map would position Republicans to gain one or two seats in the midterms," the Post noted.

In a Truth Social post on Thursday, Trump praised Landry for "moving so quickly" to suspend elections and order the redrawing of Louisiana's maps in the wake of the Supreme Court's latest assault on the Voting Rights Act. The Supreme Court's ruling struck down Louisiana's current map, which included two majority-Black districts.

"What is happening in Louisiana right now," warned Democracy Docket's Marc Elias, "is both a redistricting power grab and a dry run for authoritarian election subversion this fall."

If there is one thing the Republican Party should learn from President @realDonaldTrump— it’s to FIGHT!

That’s exactly what we are doing in Louisiana. Thank you for your support Mr. President! pic.twitter.com/W4rbcTuPp9
— Governor Jeff Landry (@LAGovJeffLandry) April 30, 2026

Trump, who has repeatedly floated the idea of canceling elections, also said Thursday that he spoke to Tennessee's Republican governor and secured a commitment to "work hard to correct" the state's maps following the Supreme Court's ruling.

US House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) voiced support for the large-scale redrawing of congressional maps in light of the Supreme Court's decision.

"I think they should do it before the midterms," Johnson said Thursday.

Landry's order in Louisiana is already facing legal action from state residents, who argued the governor's move would disenfranchise voters.

"These harms are not speculative," warns a lawsuit filed Thursday. "They are imminent: early in-person voting commences on Saturday, May 2, 2026. They are irreparable: once an election day passes, no monetary remedy can restore the franchise."


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

1 comment

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 1 point 6 months ago

He’s doing everything possible to save himself and making things even worse for himself every passing day.

This ends one of two ways: the American people vote for his demise or the American people kill him. He doesn’t understand this yet and keeps pushing for the latter.

  • source
  • 39 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 80 points 6 months ago (4 children)

    Of course he's happy that someone is testing the "suspend elections" tack.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    GOP’s phenomenal New Jim Crow triumph courtesy of the GOP-dominated Supreme Court’s obliteration of the Voting Rights Act!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Isn't this the New New Jim Crow?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 77 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Guillotines. Guillotines for all of them. Democracy needs to be defended decisively.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 6 months ago

    Does anyone else remember all the election map cases the Democrats won on the election year? After years of delay by Republicans? And we were always told it's too late for this year? And there's another bullshit map right before the next election? And it's too late again?

    I remember.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 6 months ago

    This is sedition.

    If the system won't enforce the law, the people will have to.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 6 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 30 points 6 months ago (19 children)

    When are Americans actually going to use their 2A rights for something other than performative bullshit?

    Seriously, this is the kind of shit the law was created to stop.

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 6 months ago (8 children)

    lol it's easy to sit from outside and go "do something" when in reality you would never lift a finger in violence against your government because unless you have nothing left to lose, it's not a winning bet

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    Have you seen how the French reacted to the raising of retirement age? They literally threw a bathtub through their executives home window. Americans should be dragging politicians through the streets by their entrails with all the shit that's been happening but they willingly just keep letting it happen with no actual recourse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    I agree, they should be taking more direct action to confront their leaders. America is nothing compared to France in terms of protests. They have grills that are built to slide onto the metro tram rails so they can feed the protestors as they move down the street, since they do it so much.

    I'm just saying the OP brought up 2A, and that's a pretty final solution that there's no coming back from if you go that route. Protest is one thing, assassination with firearms is a completely different thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    "Violence isn't the answer, until it's the only answer left"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    Luckily I think America still has many disruptive, non-assassination-based responses left. We're quickly careening towards that point, but I think we're still decently far away from all out violence like that. To be honest I don't think it'll ever get to that point in the MAGA time period. I really really hope I'm right.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    I'm not directing people to go do something.

    I'm openly wondering why, in a country with a law that was designed to literally protect the people from tyranny (which I think cancelling elections counts) nobody is doing anything.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 6 months ago* (1 child)

    The hierarchy of needs is being met sufficiently that going against the system providing them is scary, especially when you’re likely to die doing it.

    Same reason the bear runs when the cat chases it. Not worth the fight.

    I’m not saying this is how I believe, just this is what I believe the general reason is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago

    Exactly, everyone is still too comfortable to take such drastic action. That's fortunate because it means society hasn't broken down to the point of people starving and what not (which I don't think it'll ever get to that point in the near term). But it's unfortunate that everyone is still too comfortable to take action.

    Actually, millions of people are taking action in protests, petitions, local referendums, etc. but not many people want to take the most drastic action as they have too much to lose (e.g. their life). I want the regime to fall and face real justice without violence, but the regime is pushing everyone to get violence so they can crack down even harder against any dissent. We're speedrunning to Putin's playbook.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 6 months ago (3 children)

    It's hard. I'm a minority living quite far away with multiple guns, and to get to DC with them and close enough to leverage them would be basically impossible.

    I have them for any impending civil war against neighbors or otherwise, because I feel like that's coming.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    impending civil war against neighbors or otherwise

    We need to be making coalitions with our neighbors and otherwise. We stand no chance if we cannot stand together.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago*

    This is the text:

    A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

    The intent is pretty clear. It's been muddled by idiots through history, but it's obviously to have militias armed, trained, and ready for when an enemy attacks. At the time, most nations relied on militias for their military. Professional standing armies were reserved for the wealthiest nations, and even they usually supplemented them with militias. The USA was a new nation of farmers. It did not have the budget to have a professional military. They wrote the 2nd amendment clearly for this purpose.

    This isn't to say people shouldn't do what the charlatans have said it's for. Obviously they should if/when it's needed (not making a claim about now, that's for the reader to decide).

    I also support gun rights, though I think they should be more regulated and require training and safe storage. The 9th amendment protects this.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 6 months ago

    Welcome to the New America. Hail Trump. God Bless The Holy Republican Party.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Well for one, I don't live in a country that has a decades long history of pretending to be a democracy whereas in reality it was just all about protecting rich racist pedophiles

    For two: the USA has been bragging on every shape or form possible about ho they would protect the world, how they would have the lone hero who would stand up and sacrifice everything for the good, and do the right thing

    Now that we need that American gung ho spirit, the world is waiting and.... Crickets....

    So take all of those Hollywood movies from since the 50's about the American hero who saves the day and dump it in the garbage because it was all lies, all bullshit, because real Americans just keep on "well but if Indo that I may lose muh joobbbb" when asked to do something as simple as protest.

    Nobody has asked to bring down your government yet (well, fair, many have, but I doubt many expect that to happen), nobody has asked you to assassinate politicians, just FUCKING PROTEST already, and fuck your pussy ass no kings protests that did less than diddly squad. That was not a protest, that was just a procession to feed ducks

    For fucks sake, Americans, your country is invaded, where are your fucking heroes? You know, the ones being advertised for decades on end? I'm not seeing any of them

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Turns out the US has already had its last democratic(-ish) election. Any bets on how big a majority the GOP gets in the House this November?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

    an amuse bouche for November, America.

  • source
  • [+] -14 points 6 months ago (1 child)