This, and standardizing what "this Thursday" and "next Thursday" mean. These terms have become functionally useless (to me) because of how they're used differently by different people. Whenever someone uses these terms to try to intimate a particular date to me, I just ask for the exact calendar date rather than the day of the week to avoid ambiguity.
post
I know someone who would always say "we go on three" and then just shout "three!" Without counting or anything. I told him that was super confusing and he just didn't agree and moved on
I think he was making fun of you.
He was an EMT and it was about lifting someone in sync so they don't fall...
I think it's so the person being lifted doesn't tense, when ready for it. So you kind of surprised them but it's an acceptable surprise, as they are expecting a move.
Playing Let’s Go Eevee with my 6yo niece the other day, and when I counted trying to time our pokeball throws she would demand to be the one who counts. Her method was to try and surprise me, it seems. She would change the timing between each number independently every time, like “3, … ….. 21GO!” Sometimes, she would just throw on 1 but keep counting. Realized it was easier just to watch her arm.
That's what I do. If you're ready, you're ready, no point in counting.
XKCD 927 comes to mind.
Unconfusable:
Ready, Set, Go!
I just say "THREE!". It's the "ONE TWO THREE!" variant but I skip "ONE" and "TWO".
If you're not ready now, you won't be after the count down.
I've also heard people do "three... two... one!" and then do the thing on "one"...
Obviously for this case we need to add a signifier for the countdown so it's clear to the other parties that you are aware of the standard and adhering to it before you even begin the countdown.
Like "ISO three two one GO!"
This is semi-backwards compatible, but still confusing for normies.
Even better, just make up new words where the ambiguity never existed. No numbers at all, just "glarp dook peow" and we always go on "peow" and always have. No backwards compatibility, but you'll be guaranteed that a person who doesn't understand will need clarification, and won't go unexpectedly through imagined agreement.
Or, if backwards compatibility is required, we could count up from 1 to 3... and our signifier phrase could be something like "awnthree". As a label for the standard we're using! Like, "awnthree, one, two, three".
I think that could work 😛
I do almost exactly this, but with random digits.
"Eight... Five... Nine!."
It shows that the language matters less than the delivery.
I think you need a fourth word for better timing. A person might misinterpret the duration between glarp and dook, and arrive at peow too early or late. Just one more timing sample is better to reduce human error.
I've seen this a few times and just started at them and told them they were an idiot.
they unironically wanted to go on "one". dumbasses
In Finnish we typically say "Än, yy, tee, nyt!", because our word for "now", nyt, is composed of letters N, Y and T.
The "y" is pronounced roughly the same way as "ew" in "new". "ä" in the same as "a" in "cat", and "e" is the same as "e" in "well".
How about translating this to English and using the following as the standard?
"Aehn, oh, double you, now!"
🙃
The three syllable 'w' kinda ruins it.
Eh everyone says "dubya" anyways
Still, all other letters only clock 1 syllable. I vote we just go ahead and change the standard to "dub".
Holy shit, is that why people call george w bush dubya? As a non native English speaker I wouldn't have thought of that in a million years
Yep! Also, if you aren't familiar with the way words are either stressed or elided in spoken english, you're probably so confused when you hear native speakers talk 😅
We literally don't pronounce most of the sounds in most of the words we say. If you go around pronouncing every syllable of every word you'll sound insane

top 100 comments