all 26 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 35 points 7 months ago (1 child)

Lol if you think they've been convinced.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Haha where's this image from? Hahaha like where could I find others?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] 44 points 7 months ago (7 children)

    The USSR is still alive and they have a base in the dark side of the moon. The mission is a cover for the secret war that is starting now. Cold War 2.

    Source: I made it up

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 7 months ago* (3 children)

    No that's nazis there, dummy. It's a well known fact, I heard about a documentary of this topic

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    It would have been nice to have a livestream of the ship’s exterior throughout the duration of the flight.

    I understand resources mushed be rationed and that this mission is science-first, but still.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago* (2 children)

    It would have been nice to have a livestream of the ship’s exterior throughout the duration of the flight.

    You mean like the NASA continuous livestream showing the outside of Orion ?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    It does flip between a visualization and an actual spacecraft feed tho. So if you're just seeing a CGI capsule, you'll need to wait a bit for a real feed.

    Curious if the visualization is done when the feed gets interrupted, or if it's just part of the design.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child)

    I hate that this is totally the opposite of how real conspiracy people think.

    Edit:clarity

    They genuinely believe this is some Capricorn 1 style psyop with an empty rocket. Once the rocket leaves their view, "we're just supposed to trust NASA to tell is what's going on?" Which, sadly, isn't bad logic in is face, but during the Apollo missions, it was possible to use third party radio telemetry to prove they were, at least, in orbit.

    Reverse the roles. The standing one is the conspiracy one saying "You see how much money they're willing to spend to fool us?!" That's legit how they think.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Where are the anti moon landing conspiracy theory folk now. I want to know how this is all bullshit?

    Or do they think this one is real?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago

    The last one I saw said "they will never be able to breach the ocean above" They are so so far beyond help, no amount of evidence will convince them. You could literally put one of these people on the moon and they would call it a simulation or something.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    I'm not a moonlanding conspiracy theorist myself, but in their defense I think the main critique wasn't that it isn’t possible, but that NASA didn't have the technical prowess to pull it off in 1969

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago*

    Technically it’s only boomeranging around the moon. Walking on the moon is what these conspiracy theorists were unwilling to believe.

  • source