The CEOs of Visa, Mastercard, PayPal Holdings and Stripe received letters Thursday from Federal Trade Commission Chair Andrew Ferguson, who demanded they not discriminate against customers based on political or religious grounds.

The FTC threatened enforcement action if customers are denied services for those reasons.

Any act to “deplatform customers or deny them access to financial products or services” may violate the Federal Trade Commission Act and “could lead to an FTC investigation and potential enforcement action,” the agency said in a Thursday press release. The FTC didn’t cite any specific infractions by the companies.

The commission is typically made up of five members, but has just two at the moment. President Donald Trump last fired two of the Democrats who sat on the commission.

top 75 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 211 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (13 children)

This is interesting.

Trump sued JPMorgan Chase and its CEO, Jamie Dimon, in January for $5 billion over what he alleged was the bank’s improper closure of his accounts in 2021 for political reasons. The bank is fighting the claims. The Trump Organization, led by the president’s sons, also sued Capital One last year over similar debanking allegations, and a federal judge last week dismissed that lawsuit, but gave the plaintiffs time to refile.

Following that link:

Trump sued JPMorgan and Dimon last month, seeking at least $5 billion in damages. He claims the alleged debanking came after Trump supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, shortly before the end of the president’s first term.

So that's what this is about.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 178 points 7 months ago (10 children)

    Trump has been debanked since the late 90s by almost all US banks, because when you bankrupt two casinos and frequently spend time with mobsters they considered loans to you "high risk" for some reason.

    He's been getting loans via Europe (mostly Deutschbank.. which is also Putin's bank of choice), and Russia, for 30 years.

    That is, until he won the lottery by convincing the stupidest people alive to vote him into the highest seat of power.

    So now it's payback time against all the banks he thinks wronged him.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (9 children)

    Not giving loans doesn't mean debanked.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 7 months ago* (5 children)

    Actually, for the wealthy it does.

    Trump has been very wealthy since birth. The wealthy do not have bank accounts like your average wageslave like me, where their salary gets deposited regularly and they earn interest and make withdrawls - and perhaps have an attached home loan account, etc. We earn interest in high income accounts or term deposits and then pay tax on that earning - like suckers.

    The wealthy use an entirely different model that focuses on using debt as its main tool.

    Their assets including real estate, share portfolios, stock options and even expensive artwork are 'good debt', they perhaps don't own them fully (they may be mortgaged, loan-backed or options, etc) but they're assets that continue to grow in value over the medium term. If they sell them or divest them for real cash it becomes income that they must pay tax on. The wealthy hate paying tax. Solution: use the assets as collateral for loans and credit lines. This is how Trump lives like a king while (previously) not having much liquid cash, and also how Elon and most ultrawealthg do it - their entire personal spending is on credit accounts - debt - and by writing as much of it off as businesses expenses (meals, travel, security, etc) it all becomes tax deductable as well.

    This is the same reason a lot of business executives request most of their payment packages as stock or options - it reduces their taxable income and builds their real wealth substantially. If they want a property: mortgage against their stock & option collateral. If they need money: bank credit line with their assets as collateral.

    So when banks say to a member of the 1% such as Trump "we cannot give you a loan account, your collateral/outstanding loans at other fiancial institutions/criminal associates/track record is too risky for us", that means he cannot use that bank and must look elsewhere. He is debanked by them for his purposes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    They can use loans yes, but it's still not what debanking means.

    Btw executives get stock options because the board of directors think that gives them incentive to get the stock price up. And deferred taxes yes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    You're being pedantic.

    There are multiple types of de-banking. One explicitly applie:

    "Debanking refers to the practice by financial institutions of declining or limiting financial services to businesses across whole sectors if they are assessed as having a higher money laundering and terrorism financing (ML/TF) risk."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    Billionaires are not the 1%... they're the 0.1% of the 1%...

    I hate that occupy wall street picked such a stupid number to pick fights with. 1% is like a high earning doctor. Well off, but not like wealthy enough to buy votes and sway elections...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago

    Arguing semantics is kinda pointless when the message is that wealth needs to be distributed far better.

    Nobody at Occupy was protesting that just the billionaires need to be taxed much more and the ten-millionaires* should stay just as-is.

    *The top 1% in the USA have roughly $12 million USD net assets as of 2025. That is far more than they need to live a very comfortable life with many luxuries.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago*

    Wait wait wait, but trump (and magats) said everyone at the US 2020 insurrection that the only people there were Fed agent provocateurs and paid Antifa™™ actors.

    Well and then Trump pardoned them but that was just forgotten about and definitely unrelated.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 136 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    yeah this isn't suspicious at all.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 89 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    And certainly wouldn't be selectively enforced anyway. This is 100% "rules for thee not for me" shit.

    Like if they get debanked for "religious" or "political" reasons (esp. when they are the ones politicizing literally everything), it's a crime.

    Things that they consider political but sensible people consider "human rights", tho? They sleep.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 177 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    🤦...here we go again

    Somebody's about to do something fucking horrific again.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 83 points 7 months ago

    Anarchist/Environmentalists get debanked: I sleep.

    Epstein-club child-rapist billionaires get the slightest inconvenience: Real Shit.

  • source
  • [–] 71 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    didn't they debank the ICC ? and Francesca Albenese for her political views ?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 102 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    So I guess blocking payments to porn sites or whatever they were doing before is supposed to stop. Right? Right?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 91 points 7 months ago

    This seems like a good thing at first and that makes me extra wary.

  • source
  • [–] 84 points 7 months ago

    Process the fucking payments, payment processors.

  • source
  • [–] 37 points 7 months ago (10 children)

    I really hope some non-US controlled credit card issuers and processors start to exist soon.

    The entire US financial system seems like such a risk to participate in these days.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago

    I know it is not a payment processor but I think this needs more attention to what it got. The biggest smart card manufacturer was French. If they died (the company still exists but is a shadow of what it was), you'd have to thanks the NSA for it.

    The English Wikipedia is lacking but you'll find more details here : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemplus

    The USA is fighting dirty to keep its position overall and we are not responding at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    It's not for credit cards, but Wero is coming soon to Europe!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Not "coming soon" - it's here. I made my first Wero payment this weekend.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Oh shit nice! I'm Dutch so for me nothing changed, didn't know it was live

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

    iDEAL from what I know is basically Wero, just local. So you're already kind of using it, if you do so.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    I'm aware 🤣 that's why I didn't realize the rest of Europe could use it already

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    Sadly so far only Belgium, Germany, and France. Why those already managed to put in Wero while the rest hasn't, is beyond me.

    Are there actual, practical reasons? Or are other countries' governments being lobbied too hard to not put through with Wero?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 34 points 7 months ago (8 children)

    Can I finally buy my porn games without some third party fucking over the developers?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Only if you register church of porn games where porn games would be worshiped.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago* (1 child)

    Organizing a religion that emphasizes freedom and tries to incorporate all our likes or dislikes into it is one test of religious freedom I've always wanted to make.

    After all if you can globally mutilate children and harass every single other group in existence for religious purposes surely we can be allowed total media freedom, subsidies for our cultural high quality food and preferred parking for our subsidized luxury cars for our starter sacred privileges in society?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago

    The Satanic Temple is close enough.

    THERE ARE SEVEN FUNDAMENTAL TENETS

    I One should strive to act with compassion and empathy toward all creatures in accordance with reason.

    II The struggle for justice is an ongoing and necessary pursuit that should prevail over laws and institutions.

    III One’s body is inviolable, subject to one’s own will alone.

    IV The freedoms of others should be respected, including the freedom to offend. To willfully and unjustly encroach upon the freedoms of another is to forgo one's own.

    V Beliefs should conform to one's best scientific understanding of the world. One should take care never to distort scientific facts to fit one's beliefs.

    VI People are fallible. If one makes a mistake, one should do one's best to rectify it and resolve any harm that might have been caused.

    VII Every tenet is a guiding principle designed to inspire nobility in action and thought. The spirit of compassion, wisdom, and justice should always prevail over the written or spoken word

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 7 months ago

    Ah but its okay to disenfranchise those whose politics dont fit the federal narrative innit

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 7 months ago

    Every accusation is a confession, tjere are seemingly no exceptions.

  • source
  • [–] 47 points 7 months ago (10 children)

    Has this actually happened, or just playing the victim again?

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 7 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] 52 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    The OCC expressed concern that, between 2020 and 2025, the banks restricted access or required “escalated reviews and approvals before providing … access” to certain customers with connections to oil and gas, coal, firearms, private prisons, tobacco, payday lending, adult entertainment, digital assets or political action committees and political parties.

    It’s that last part that, presumably, spurred President Donald Trump in January to accuse Bank of America – while its CEO was on stage at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland – of debanking conservatives.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    Thanks, but that article doesn’t mention too many specifics either. I am going to assume that if someone was denied service it’s because they are criminals, not conservatives. The line is blurry though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 7 months ago* (2 children)

    There was a big deal last year after Mastercard and Visa threatened the indie game site itch.io for allowing adult games, after a single complaint from an Australian anti-porn group.

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jul/29/mastercard-visa-backlash-adult-games-removed-online-stores-steam-itchio-ntwnfb

    Payment processors shouldn't be gatekeepers of what we can buy. They should just process the payments and take their cut for being a middleman.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    Everyone in the West cheered when Visa and MasterCard cut Russia off their processing by their own initiative. Now in the past year Europeans suddenly realized what this might mean, and are clamoring for a pan-European payment processor. While Russia already had one of their own for ages.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Nazis say that you are required to let Nazis be your customers. Also that you don't have to serve people you don't want to when it fits their narrative.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 7 months ago

    How DARE they Discriminate AGAINST the Epstein Class!

    -Republicans probably!

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    I don't trust this administration to enforce this fairly or evenly at all. And even then, they shouldn't be able to discriminate for any fucking reason. They are a payment processor! It's like your utility company saying what you can and can't use the electricity you pay for... for.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    Credit card companies are just more middle-men in a whole sea of them. trump would rather you borrow from his "bankers". Easy-credit but the vig will kill you.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    FUCK YOU demented rapist toady

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago*

    Nobody is being "debanked" except Trump, and it's because his accounts were tied to criminal activity, not politics.

    Stop committing crime, and you can put the money in a bank.

    Meanwhile, MAGA is talking about making it illegal for undocumented people to have bank accounts. So who is actually denying banking privileges based on politics?

  • source
  • [+] -6 points 7 months ago (9 children)

    Crypto could replace all these companies

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    There are issues with speed/capacity of payments, and if the wrong crypto is used (i.e. those with proof of work, like Bitcoin, instead of proof of stake) it's an environmental disaster.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

    Bitcoin isn't the only crypto

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    So name a cryptocurrency that doesn't have a scalability issue, and that could handle the volumes of transactions that the global credit card payment processors do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment