Have been almost completly vegetarian for the last 4 and a half years and was pretty much a carnivore before that, so I feel this is as unbiased of an opinion as is possible.

The Beyond, Gardien, Impossible, etc fake chicken have more flavor, nearly indistinguishable texture, are just as juicy, and aren't greasy. At this point, I consider them better than regular chicken with the sole exception of fried chicken which was never my favorite but I can see the appeal of it.

I'll concede that the beef substitutes have a ways to go (I like them and they're not bad but they're not fooling anyone, either) but they're not the subject of this opinion.

all 88 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 55 points 7 months ago (11 children)

I prefer my chicken meatless too. Honestly the bones and feathers are my favourite part.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    I just drink the blood and throw out the rest.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    If you don’t juice the whole bird with one of these things you’re missing out on vital nutrients.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    The worst part is that you have to eat the beak

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 7 months ago (9 children)

    I have tried a number of the substitutes available in Australia, our products aren't even close. My missus is vegetarian and she hates them as well, there is some sort of underlying chemical taste to most of the products over here.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Impossible mince has entirely replaced beef in our pasta sauces and Mexican dishes. Soaks up the flavours around it well and has that familiar chew/bounce of minced beef. But it really can’t stand on its own. My mum even made some impossible meat pies for us and they were excellent.

    As for the chicken substitutes in Australia, no real winners yet. Best we’ve had is rissoles that are 50% chicken.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 6 points 7 months ago

    Impossible mince has entirely replaced beef in our pasta sauces and Mexican dishes. Soaks up the flavours around it well and has that familiar chew/bounce of minced beef.

    Has a different name in the US so had to look it up, but yeah, it's great for sauces and spiced dishes. I also have had good results with the "meatless crumbles" which are just ground/minced beef-like textured vegetable protein as they also soak up flavor like nobody's business and have similar chew/bounce

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 4 points 7 months ago

    some sort of underlying chemical taste

    I notice that with the beef substitutes (they vaguely smell like canned dog food lol) but finally just got used to it. All the chicken-like products, though, taste like, well, chicken lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    Been a minute, but I want to say it was Impossible where some friends and I realized it had that aspertaine/diet coke after taste. Beyond was okay though.

    But yeah. Anyone who claims the meat substitutes are "better" either haven't eaten meat in ages or never liked it to begin with. And vegetarian food needs to stop emulating meat and instead focus on its actual strengths (mostly sauce absorption).

    Except for black bean burgers. Prepped right and I would totally consider those better than beef burgers (way better than turkey burgers).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    No, just because it isn't replicating meat perfectly doesn't mean it isn't better. That's an opinion. I could say "if you like your meat seasoned, you never really liked meat." It'd be a pretty stupid opinion, but just as valid. It's all an opinion based on personal preference.

    I agree though, the key thing about meat substitutes is realizing they aren't meat. They need to be treated a little differently. They can absolutely be better in some circumstances. You have to learn how to cook with them though, just as you did for meat.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -1 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Chicken is especially weird to care about emulating the flavor of. It's ass by itself. What makes it good is the stuff you coat it in.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Cook a chicken properly and it is delicious. The issue is that people mostly eat nuggets (which are good but...) where it is just breading and a bland flavorless mass.

    Or they trim it to death and then overcook it (an ex managed to dry out thighs...). Which, to be fair, is true of beef as well. A LOT of the ultra lean cuts are horrendous without excessive amounts of sauce and spices.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    That is actually a good point. I only eat white meat because I don't like the gristly gross parts of the rest of it. Maybe I just don't like the flavor of chicken...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    And that is perfectly fine. But:

    White meat is a real challenge. Tenderloins and wings (and back meat if you are a culture that eats it) are pretty easy to cook up. But breasts, especially modern breasts, are a huge challenge.

    In large part because you don't want grizzle or dangly bits. That is what you SHOULD be trimming off. But you do want fat pockets and connective tissue in the meat itself. That melts/renders and keeps the meat juicy while also soaking it with a LOT of flavor. In thighs those are the little specs of white fat/"skin" that are left over on top of the meat itself even if you take the skin off. Trim those and you remove much of the flavor.

    But for breasts? Most of that is going to come from the skin itself. A skinless breast is one where you better damned well have a good sauce (preferably marinade) because "dry brining" only goes so far. But, unless you (spatchcock and) roast it, getting that to a safe temperature (which is nowhere near as high as you think it is but...) without drying out large chunks of it is really difficult. Which is why people tend to butterfly and pound it to even things out. Which... means you no longer have the skin to flavor it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Hard agree, but that's probably I'm only used to the 'plofkip' variety. 'Plofkip' is a Dutch word which roughly translate as 'Exploding chicken', which is chickens that are raised at an unnatural rate. After being um.. processed, the meat is commonly injected with water as well. That stuff smells vile and the taste is mediocre at best. It is also almost physically impossible to burn it while cooking because of the water content.

    I would not know what a chicken would taste like if it had had an actual life. I am told, it is a world of difference, but I would buy the vegetarian or vegan alternative anyway.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    I raise my own meat chickens (cornish cross). They see sunlight and get fresh pasture at least two times per day (chicken tractor). They eat bugs, worms, frogs, and grass, and anything else they might encounter, as well as meat bird food.

    They taste much better than the factory birds you can buy at grocery stores. I dont know that i would describe the taste as "a world of difference," but definitely much better.

    Plofkip sounds terrible.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Hey in the way if beef substitutes, have you tried carne de soya? It's sold as "textured soy protein" here in the US which isn't as tasty sounding, but effectively it's dried, shelf stable tofu and it's hugely popular among the poor in mexico for being dirt cheap and very healthy.

    Because of it's dry sponge like properties, it soaks up flavor and fats like you would not believe, and the way it's crumbled let's out Cook to be nearly identical to perfectly cooked 90:10 ground beef. I now use it for everything but meatloaf and biscuits in gravey.

    You can mix any combination of flavor with some olive oil and water/broth/beer/thin sauce/etc as a marinade, toss it in to soak it up, throw it in a pan and cook it until it's the texture you like. Made sloppy joes with it, better than with beef. Flavored it like I was making Italian sausage, best pasta I've ever had. Mixed it with bacon fat, pale ale, and a fist full of spices, put it in chili, and my coworkers refuse to believe it's not two pounds of chorizo. My autistic spouse is the only person who can genuinely distinguish the difference in texture, and I rule out that it's because she introduced me to it. It even comes out perfectly in a crock pot!

    To top it off, it's $1 for 5oz, which is about 2lbs of beef worth of volume, has the same protein per serving, and a third of the calories with still half the calories after you add in your oil.

    I'll be frank, I'm not into it for a health food reason, I'm into it for a culinary experience reason. I can flavor it in two different profiles and cook them both in the same dish, and the flavors will stay distinct in the meaty bits while mingling in the sauce. It's functionally flavorless on it's own and uncooked has the texture of fresh crumbly cheese when rehydrated, so you could probably soak it in whey, salt and herbs to get unmeltable cheese. I'm even toying with the idea of grinding it to smaller bits, flavoring it with vanilla and simple syrup, and putting it in rocky road cookies as a substitute for marshmallow that won't be sticky or caramelize on the bottom of the pan. The possibilities here are endless!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Not that brand specifically, but I use the TVP crumbles in a lot of dishes. The ones I get are frozen and like $5.50 for ~14 oz so not exactly a bargain but I'll keep an eye out for that brand next time I'm out. They go great in sauces or for chili, tacos, and things like that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago*

    Just look for dried tvp and it should be much cheaper and functionally similar across brands. Plus you can determine the flavoring yourself. Adding a little no beef better than bouillon when you marinate/cook it can go a long way towards increasing the beefiness.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Great post :)

    I can't say I agree in detail, but I don't disagree completely either.

    I'd say that it depends on brand, preparation, and then personal taste (as in the variability of human taste as a sense, not preferences) as to whether a given substitute is going to be better, acceptable, or worse.

    Texture wise, I'd agree that the usual options are on par. Slightly different, but not in a bad way. Juiciness, in my experience, is iffy. Definitely not as greasy; but for some dishes, that missing fat is a significant detriment. Flavor is more like texture; any given person is going to interpret the chemicals on their tongue slightly differently.

    I think where the substitutes often fail for the most part is the smell, not the actual on-tongue taste. Even though most chicken meat isn't going to smell a lot, it is there, and the nose is very important to perceived flavor. I've yet to smell any chicken substitutes that smell right at all, though none have smelled bad. Soups and stews that aren't very chicken centric, that won't matter. But other stuff, it can and will.

    Something like chicken noodle soup though? That's a hell no lol. You can't currently get anything that will make a stock that actually tastes right. I'm not saying you can't make good soup with chicken substitutes, just that it's a totally different taste. Enough so that calling it by the same name would be a joke.

    Where chicken substitutes shine is nugget size dishes that don't rely on the chicken fats and soluble components for the flavor. I've had some sesame substitute that was as good or better than chicken. Stuff like that, with sauces, or even straight up breaded nuggets, that's where even if the substitutes didn't taste of anything at all, they'd be just fine.

    Now me? I tend to be of the mind that for most dishes, you're better off just abandoning the original meat based recipe entirely and just cook things that make veggies shine on their own.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

    Could be right on the smell, but TBH, I've never really associated chicken with a particular smell (except fried chicken) but I always liken that more to the cooking process than the meat itself.

    I probably did leave out a fair number of dishes/use-cases since most of my chicken consumption that isn't just snacking is in the form of sandwiches, cutlets, and casseroles: things that don't don't necessarily need the fat to make the dish. Same for things like quesadillas and fajitas. But at the end of the day, this post is my own personal opinion and not a blanket statement of fact lol.

    I'm also not a strict vegetarian, so using chicken stock is acceptable when needed though I usually make due with oil/butter and spices.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Back when I smoked, I couldn't pick up the smell of chicken. I always thought it was just bland, but it was that I didn't get enough of the smell. Scent is a big part of perceived taste (as opposed to the actual detection that happens on the tongue only), and food has been so much better overall since I quit.

    Since chicken, particularly breast meat, doesn't have a very strong smell, it's easy to not notice it even when one's nose isn't inhibited by something

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    The beyond steak tips are pretty good. I've been using it as a beef substitute in tacos and in Hamburger Helper. The Hamburger Helper meal is now my 5 year old's favourite food.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    Quorn is the best I've had. I don't think it's quite as tasty as real chicken, but it's close enough for plenty of uses. It's a touch dry. It has very good verisimilitude to slightly overcooked chicken.

    I find Gardien's beef crumbles to be equally enjoyable as beef for chili and tacos and overall better when considering convenience, putting aside the ethical argument.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    Ill find out when I find them with price parity.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 7 months ago* (2 children)

    I wonder to what kind of chicken you are comparing it though considering you mention fried chicken. Some minced chicken mixed with condiments? I can believe that. A high quality well roasted chicken with no condiments needed? I have doubts the substitutes are there.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child)

    Filets, cutlets, popcorn chicken, tenders, nuggets, strips (like you'd use for fajitas), as well as dishes made with those (chicken soups, cassseroles, etc). Haven't seen a good "drumstick" or "wing" substitute unless you allow for boneless but those are basically nuggets lol. Same for rotisserie chickens.

    The closest thing to a rotisserie chicken would be like a Tofurkey and while they can be good, they're not fooling anyone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    You're talking cuts of meat and the person you're replying to is talking about seasoning the meat - does using just a small amount of salt and pepper create a noticeable difference in flavor between raised and generated meat?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Everyone I've tried is obviously fake. They're too rubbery. The texture is all off. Not awful, but nothing on the real thing.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (9 children)

    How is it chicken if it doesn’t have meat?

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

    When you buy "chicken" at the store, is it referring to the animal, or the flavor and texture?

    EDIT: About the response I was expecting, and I think I agree in this instance. I was just curious to get others' viewpoints. It might have been better to phrase it as "When you see the word 'chicken' on a product…"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    also, non-dairy ben&jerry's >> regular b&j

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    Quorn is my favorite. That shit is tasty. Don't get me wrong, I'll fat bitch a plate of wings in a heartbeat, to stop said heartbeat, but I do prefer Quorn to nuggets or tendies.

    Mainly, chicken breast is bland if unseasoned, and that's what meatless chicken is emulating. So, any flavor tends to stand out more.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    For beef mince, textured vegetable protein (soy mince) perfectly captures the texture IMO, and you can make it taste any way you like. It's actually more protein-dense than beef mince, too, and it's completely shelf-stable. I bought a huge bag of it over a year ago. It's very convenient. I use it to make a fucking incredible chilli recipe

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    My brother in owning tastebuds... On all cooking shows/challenges/etc, they always do side by side comparisons - which is the best tomato sauce? Blindfolds, side by side comparisons... You know why? Because NO ONE would be able to compare a sauce from today to a sauce from when we filmed last week, much less FOUR YEARS AGO.

    This is a pet peeve of mine as my irl community is filled with vegans/vegetarians and I hear shit like this ALL THE TIME.

    "No trust me it tastes exactly like XXXX"

    "When's the last time you had XXXX?"

    "Highscool"

    long sigh

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah, not to rag on vegans or vegetarians, but their palates are fucked from not eating certain foods for years. We’ve had friends take us out to “the best places in town” and they were raving while eating and it was bland garbage, my wife and I could barely stomach it. When you eat tasteless food for years your body tricks you into thinking that it has the same flavor because you wouldn’t want to live otherwise.

    Like, my MiL thinks that salt makes food taste bad. SALT. She hardly uses any in her cooking and only does because we complain that she doesn’t use salt.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    I like most chicken substitutes. Some are impressively close to real chicken in terms of texture and taste. Actual, well prepared chicken is still a lot more delicious and offers more variation between different parts and the way they can be prepared.

    I think this is still a pretty unpopular opinion, even if I've heard similarly positive responses to chicken substitute products from people I know (who aren't necessarily vegetarian). I've never heard anyone say they were flat out superior.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    While I still eat meat occasionally, I try to choose vegetarian/vegan stuff when I can. I have only tried one chicken alternative plant based something, and while I could definitely tell the difference, I really don't mind it: it's tasty, even if in a slightly different manner.

    What I can totally switch to without skipping a beat is Beyond Meat "beef" patties. At least the ones I had back around 2021.

    Back when I was a kid we raised our own chickens, so I'm still waiting for a proper substitute, but I haven't tried everything yet.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    What I can totally switch to without skipping a beat is Beyond Meat "beef" patties

    Maybe I'm just cooking them wrong. We didn't raise cattle growing up, but we always bought a side of beef from a neighbor, so that's my benchmark. Maybe I'm the same way as you with chickens.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    There is a brand they sell at a vegan store where the chicken is very close in texture to real chicken, that I can't eat much of it. They also have a beef product that is super close to real steak/beef. And same, I can't eat it (makes my stomach churn), but my wife loves it. She's more of a I gave up neat for animals type, but loves the taste/texture/dishes and I more of the "I never enjoyed meat" type.

    I'll find the brand name out next time I buy it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Now I'm interested to try it. I do have two criticisms of the non-meat alternatives. The first is price. They're typically significantly more expensive, which seems odd to me. The second is lack of variety. The beyond sausages are actually really, really good. But there is only one type. The permutations of real sausages is so vast I'm spoiled for choice.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 2 points 7 months ago

    Yeah, they're definitely pricey. I tend to buy in bulk when they go on sale, and they freeze just fine.

    The Beyond breakfast sausages are absolutely delicious. There's two, maybe three, varieties available in my area. There's the links, which are my favorite, and also the patties. I'm not sure if they stopped making them or my grocery store just stopped carrying them, but there used to be a maple sausage one that was beyond amazing.

    Impossible makes a ground sausage that's also really good. It comes in a sleeve like regular ground sausage and, IMO, tastes better than the real thing.

    If you're talking about the brats, then yeah, AFAIK there's only one type of those.

    The meatballs are kind-of sausage-y and also excellent.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    I think some of the chicken is hit or miss, but Beyond Burgers are definitely better than the real thing.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    Yes. Vegan Gyros is nice, too. And you'll get higher quality than some random super cheap meat that just couldn't be used for any other product.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago*

    I had one that tasted hella good, but the texture with how it was like cabbage or something folded up a bunch, it was like chewing a wad of toilet paper.

    The most perfect meat substitute I have ever had was carrot bacon. Cut thin enough, cooked to crispiness and covered in seasoning and liquid smoke, it's indistinguishable from real bacon. It even kinda looks like bacon.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    That's like saying cake is better than meatballs. "Vegan meat" has nothing to do with meat.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago* (2 children)

    This is childish.

    It's literally a product designed to imitate and fill the role of meat.

    It would be like saying that synthetic motor oil has nothing to do with motor oil.

    Having strong opinions doesn't always make you look smart.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 child)

    Synthetic motor oil is chemically quite similar to conventional motor oil. Both are made from hydrocarbons. One is drilled from the ground, the other is made in a lab. Lab-grown meat vs. animal meat would be a much better comparison.

    But you're comparing apples to oranges. Vegan chicken that tastes exactly like chicken is as good as it can get. If it tastes better than actual chicken, then you've just created a new meat-like product with a chicken-ish taste.

    It's like a Charlie Chaplin look-alike contest where Charlie Chaplin himself ranks sixth. You can say someone looks almost like Charlie Chaplin, but claiming they look more like him than he does himself doesn't make any sense. At that point you're just saying you prefer the way one thing looks (or tastes) over the other. So you could equally say cake is better than meatballs.

    Having opposing opinions doesn't mandate insulting the other party.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago

    If it tastes better than actual chicken, then you've just created a new meat-like product with a chicken-ish taste.

    It's like a Charlie Chaplin look-alike contest where Charlie Chaplin himself ranks sixth. You can say someone looks almost like Charlie Chaplin, but claiming they look more like him than he does himself doesn't make any sense.

    No, that is not a similar situation, since Charlie Chaplin is, by definition, a single entity with a single definition.

    Chicken meat on the other hand, is a range of flavours and textures. Chicken nuggets feel nothing like roast chicken, which feels nothing like pulled chicken. White meat tastes different then dark meat, the and connective tissues add other flavours as well. Different species of chickens tastes different as do chickens on different diets, and the taste of chicken has changed over time. Hell, American chicken tastes notably worse than chicken in most other countries.

    You are not dealing with a single defined thing, especially when dealing with the broad category of everything allowed to be called chicken at the grocery store, like chicken nuggets and burgers. It is entirely possible for a synthetic fake chicken product, to slot into this spectrum of options.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    Aren't the sodium levels really high with that stuff? I'm not trying to dismiss all the benefits of getting away from meat but you can't ignore that a lot of that is ultr-processed.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 1 point 7 months ago

    A little bit high, yeah, but you don't usually need to salt or season it in most cases. Not to mention regular chicken often gets heavily salted, so in my mind it's more or less the same in the end.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    How can you have any pudding if you don't eat your meat?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    Honestly, for nuggets and chicken burgers I could see this but there's no way this is remotely true for roast chicken / chicken breasg unless all those brands have dramatically changed their products recently.

    The texture between difference between actual real chicken and chicken paste that they add to nuggets burgers etc is wildly different and I've never seen any fake chicken product be able to replicate that texture.

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago (5 children)

    They have more flavor but the flavor isn't chicken... Despite being called chicken. My main issue with imitation meats is just that they won't be honest about what they are... If it's a flakey tofu or something of a certain style just name it that, why call it the thing people are trying to avoid?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    why call it the people are trying to avoid?

    firstly, culture, specifically cooking culture is very much based around 4 main protein types, beef chicken lamb and pork. when cooking you want something easy and obvious to substitute, so you pick the thing labeled the thing you want.

    also, most people don't stop eating meat because it tastes bad, they stop eating it because it's inherently cruel and a huge burden on the world's fragile ecosystem. of course i still want a juicy steak, but morality gets in the way and i compromise.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Isn't cooking with the meat substitutes different enough that you need to compensate for it? I'm not a very good cook, so my assumption might be wrong there. But if I'm making reb bean burgers instead of beef burgers I imagine it's more useful to know "this is mostly bean with some binder" than "beef substitute"

    And if flavor is the main goal then I think the industry in general is doing a bad job. Most of the time the base for the substitute has such a different flavor that they throw a bunch of other stuff on top of it to mask it instead of embracing the flavor of the substitute.

    I'm not trying to say you're wrong, but it still doesn't make much sense to me. Why remind people of the moral conundrum in the label.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    great comment, lots of fun. i wanna start at the bottom;

    Why remind people of the moral conundrum in the label.

    for someone in that "scene", reminders are constant and unrelenting, meat is a basis of western society. bringing it up isnt declaring an unspoken truth, it's just declaring a somewhat recognisable flavour profile.

    And if flavor is the main goal then I think the industry in general is doing a bad job.

    well, yeah, maybe. idk ive never made a better one, its probably really fucking hard to make products that taste specifically like beef, especially to a palate that eats it regularly.

    if I'm making reb bean burgers instead of beef burgers I imagine it's more useful to know "this is mostly bean with some binder" than "beef substitute"

    i definately see what your saying, but meat is like, the easiest thing to cook, (especially within the context that meat subs would be eaten in). burger is an especially bad example as you really just want to sear it.

    dunno if any of these answers are satisfying, let me know :)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    I think your answers would be more satisfying if the flavor and textures were closer on substitutes. I'm sure it is hard to do, I think I always assumed if companies spent more time making tasty meat alternatives, instead of trying to replicate meat we'd make more progress in reducing meat consumption. Maybe that's just wishful thinking though.

    I look at it as a person who eats meat but is interested in trying alternatives pretty casually. I'm not looking for something to replace meats in my life, I'm looking for new foods to fill the same role in a meal as meats (sometimes). And I just find it a bit annoying to have to go to the fine print / ingredient list so often to see what I'm actually buying.

    I appreciate the chat though, I can see where you're coming from. I think I treat food a bit differently from someone just looking to grab their components of a meal... and calling in "meat substitute" is mostly a tell that it's high in protein and fills that roll in a meal. Removes the extra step of needing to know what parts of the alternatives have the protein...

    If I cared enough I'd have some from-scratch recipes, but it's more of a minor annoyance and something to think about while I shop

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    At this point, I consider them better than regular chicken with the sole exception of fried chicken which was never my favorite

    Ha! Now we know you are a vegan plant, how ironic!!! 😀

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 7 months ago

    I haven't tried a lot of them and I'm not vegetarian or vegan.

    But Morningstar Farms "chicken" patties are superior to any actual mechanically separated chicken item.

  • source
  • [–] -5 points 7 months ago*

    Meatless chicken is better than regular chicken

    This makes me want to find a crowded street and punch random people in the dick.

  • source