top 97 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 53 points 7 months ago (6 children)

I thought VR/AR would be farther along. There was a pitch 10 years ago that VR would be the β€œfinal platform” in that anything a phone, TV, tablet, or computer could do could be easily emulated in VR.

Unfortunately it’s still all walled gardens. Also nobody wants to wear that shit for more than an hour.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    More specifically I thought one of the approaches to an omni-treadmill would catch on enough for an at-home model to be available to the public.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Brain implants are progressing, so I'm still hopeful to see full-dive VR in my lifetime. Also scared of how it will be enshtitfied.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah... as amazing as full dive VR would be, I'd be afraid that weaponized would be a better term for how it would be implemented than enshitified.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    Yeah, you coukd extend the social media reality bubbles ppl are living in to actual perceived reality. You coukd also block out homeless people and this hyper individuallism that it wouod enable would stop those kinds of problems from having any hope of being solved.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 45 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    When I was a kid in the 80s I thought we'd absolutely have some kind of moon base by now. More space stuff in general. What is more "future" than space?

    Green energy is maybe 10 years behind where younger me would have wished it to be, it feels we're close to some big breakthroughs. I'm still hopefully to see some game changing things in my lifetime.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    There's just really not a very useful reason outside of "because we can", so it hasn't really been a priority. Still, that's kinda the point of the Artemis program, so we're getting there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Usefulness is no fun. Those 80s and 90s attitudes wouldn't worry about something like that. We'd have done it just show off and/or to keep the Soviets from doing it first. Don't tell us we have rocks at home, I want space rocks. I want a bucket full of ice from the rings of Saturn. I want a slab of something that got melted by Venus. That stuff is cool.

    I hope they do something fun with Artemis. It doesn't feel like most people are excited for space anymore and that bums me out.

    For All Mankind is coming back in a few days, so that will have to do for now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 39 points 7 months ago

    Better general medical science. So much of what we use is very old tech. We still can't regrow cartligage. We still pin bones together with titanium screws. We still mostly use fiberglass casts (though better alternatives exist). We still catch the common cold.

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    I thought we'd have affordable 8TB SSD's.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 26 points 7 months ago (2 children)
    • Genetic-level diagnoses and treatments.

    • Inexpensive, rapid genome sequencing.

    • Commonplace genetic counselling for more than just pregnancy.

    • Laws in place to govern the collection, use, ownership, and patenting of human genes and genetic information.

    • Cloned tissues (i.e. blood, skin), organs (i.e. heart, lungs, kidneys) for transplant or repair.

    I graduated university the same year the Human Genome Project first published completion. Certainly, that project uncovered more questions than answers.

    Also, we've done an absolutely garbage job of becoming appropriate stewards of this technology. Primarily, today, it would be used to identify, segregate, subjugate, and eventually kill a portion of the population.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    Laws in place to govern the collection, use, ownership, and patenting of human genes and genetic information.

    I feel that for laws to exist, you first need some accidents to prompt the public outcry to get them passed. And accidents in genetics are going to be very messy indeed

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 46 points 7 months ago (16 children)

    LED light bulbs were supposed to last a bajillion hours. When they came out around 2010-ish they were still expensive and I spent many hundreds of dollars replacing every single light bulb in my house, thinking I would basically never have to replace a light bulb again.

    It's 2026 and I now replace the LED bulbs in my house almost as often as I replaced incandescent bulbs. Seriously? LEDs are solid-state technology. There are no moving parts, no gases, no hot filaments...

    I understand that it's probably on purpose; if everyone replaced all the light bulbs in their house with LED bulbs that lasted basically forever then who would buy more light bulbs from light bulb manufacturers.

    But it's still just dumb. Either LED technology is flawed, or our economic system that incentivizes a constant cycle of replacing bulbs is flawed. This should should not exist in 2026.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 7 months ago

    no hot filaments...

    There may not be filaments, but heat is still an issue for LEDs.

    Some bulb manufacturers basically overdrive cheaper diodes to get extra brightness at the cost of generating extra heat. Some of those manufacturers compensate for the heat in some way, others don't even bother and produce bulbs with a service life of months instead of decades. Some of these are fly-by-night online sellers that won't exist anymore by the time their products start to fail. Others are established brands that people will blindly purchase based on a reputation that no longer matches reality. There are some reliable brands out there if you read up on it, but why the fuck should we have to research every little inane item in our life?

    Aside from corporate greed, though, there are other reasons heat causes early LED bulb failure. Two common ones are incompatible devices on the same circuit (like light dimmers), and installing the bulb in an enclosure without adequate heat dissipation (like a ceiling 'boob' light).

    I've been all LED for well over a decade, and have had a good experience so far. I personally tend to buy smart bulbs that can put out way more light than I need, and run them at 20-50% brightness most of the time. Feit Electric and Govee's basic smart bulbs have been pretty reliable for me, but I admit I'm a pretty small sample size. I know I'm paying a premium for that approach, but it's not unreasonable and I do prefer not having to worry about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Something is wrong with the ones you're buying, then.

    Studies show that they do, on average, last dozens of times longer. Personally I replace them way less often than incandescent.

    I suppose the earliest ones were worse and there are definitely garbage ones out there. And even good brands have a did here and there. And if you have poor/inconsistent power, or placing them in hot, enclosed fixtures, they don't perform as well as they could.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 7 months ago* (3 children)

    Oh that's a fun one. Original incandescents lasted a very long time. Too long (over 10,000 hrs, and there are many examples of ones that have been lit for decades!). The various manufacturers actually conspired(spent a lot of money on research and development) to a 1,000 hr operational benchmark. Profits exploded.

    This is common (engineered predictable fault.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    The Phoebus Cartel was objectively terrible, but it turns out there are perfectly good engineering reasons to limit them to 1000 hours. It has to do with the chemistry of tungsten. Those bulbs that last forever give off exceedingly little light, and the 1000 hour rule is from a standard that predates the cartel.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    I was there for the transition period between incandescents and LEDs: The CFL.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 21 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Guillotines and a lineup of billionaires in straight jackets

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Fusion lol.

    Better space tech or at least a moon base.

    Modular body parts like in cyberpunk

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 21 points 7 months ago (10 children)
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (3 children)

    EVs are pretty cheap now. How cheap did you think?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 20 points 7 months ago*

    More of a pet peeve, but I thought IT would be way more stable by now. Everything has so many bugs and it's just accepted. I've grown pessimistic about new tech and I would prefer to wait a couple years before getting it. It's not novel if it's broken.

    Side thought, I thought we would have hologram phone calls by now.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    Phones that can be opened up and have internals replaced, like desktop computers

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago

    I thought we would finally have haptic touchscreens in our devices. There were some experiments in the past, but it never happened outside of niche industry applications.

    Makes me a little bit sad, because being able to feel elements is really useful - I can type blind on my Titan 2 phone (which has a real keyboard) and in cars, it would really improve safety.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Level 4 self driving cars.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 28 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Ability to live in balance with the earth

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 7 months ago

    Compassion, empathy, socialism.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago

    Those thin transparent screens you see in sci fi movies.

  • source
  • [–] 56 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    Realistically?

    • Housing that doesn't cost a fortune

    • Healthcare that doesn't bankrupt you

    • Food that's both affordable and worth eating

    None of it is futuristic. All of it feels further away than ever.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    Your answer is something you want to force into the conversation, not what OP asked.

    You're not wrong, but that's not the conversation man.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah, the reason we don't have those isn't technological. We could have it today if we collectively decided that we wanted it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    That’s not really how it works, or we’d already have them. People in China have those things because they beat the fascist KMT back to Formosa, and by force subordinated the bourgeoisie and the remnants of feudalism.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    As it is written in the ŚūraαΉ…gama SΕ«tra:

    It is like when someone points his finger at the moon to show it to someone else. Guided by the finger, that person should see the moon. If he looks at the finger instead and mistakes it for the moon, he loses not only the moon but the finger also. Why? It is because he mistakes the pointing finger for the bright moon.

    Recently quoted by Bruce Lee, than in the movie Le Fabuleux Destin d'AmΓ©lie Poulain

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    I definitely thought we’d have Ar glasses by now

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago

    Windshield wipers that don't smear.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago

    I thought we would be able to redo our dna in adults using viruses or other vectors completely. Where we are now I thought we would be in like 2010. So we are making progress but I thought we would be farther along and genetic disease would be a thinf of the past.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago

    Actual hoverboards, as promised.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Self driving cars. Ten years ago I said, "we'll have this worked out in 10 years". What a fool I was.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago

    Elmo has claimed to have it for over 10 years now

    You weren't a fool, you simply were lied to

    Elmo always lies, every second word put of his mouth is a lie. Every project he boasts about has been a lie.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    A cure for all diseases and illnesses.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 7 months ago (10 children)

    Synthetic meat that's actually edible/palatable

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    We have that already and I've eaten it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    I've tried a lot and have not found any of it very appetizing.

    Most has a very rubbery texture as soon as it cools slightly.

    Very unpleasant.

    I'd rather just not have any meat than have it.

    But it you have had the good stuff, please send me your recommendations.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 4 points 7 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    I refer to - Not meat from animals.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    I interpreted this as real meat tissue grown synthetically rather that minced ingredients that mimics meat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    It's hard to synthesize the animal suffering that people crave

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    I'm not a vegan but I do believe that eating meat from an animal that suffered it's whole life surely passes on to the person who consumed it.

    I don't eat meat that often but when I do I always buy free range.

    I tell people, even if you can't go vegetarian or vegan (I'm one of those) you can reduce your consumption of animal products. Be more mindful of wasting animal products and always buy free range when possible.

    If everyone scales back a bit that would make a huge difference.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 6 points 7 months ago

    Recycling that actually works.

  • source
  • Maglev trains in the US

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago

    Standardized connector for everything with backwards compatibility

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago

    I was hoping that by now technology and education would have helped all the humans to realize how to take care of each other and work together for a better tomorrow.

    Instead we got this fucking mess that's going on right now all around the world.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 7 months ago

    Brit on a train; A phone network that would offer a reasonable level of connectivity no matter where you are in the country.

    Ours definitely took a few steps back early 2023.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago
    load more comments
    view more: next β€Ί