found on the internal disk of my device

top 46 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 74 points 7 months ago

The hair clips are a nice detail.

  • source
  • [+] 48 points 7 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] [S] 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

    ew, a woman? on the internet? weird (/s)

    god forbid a girl have some fun on the internet (smh)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 7 months ago (6 children)

    You can't do this and not say cleavage. C'mon!

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (4 children)

    ...what? I think you might commented on the wrong post

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 7 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago*

    Beautiful, but the hair things, esp. 3 and 5, dont line up with what I remember from bio

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 7 months ago

    We always love when woman turns into women.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 7 months ago (10 children)

    ... and that's how a slime girl is 'born'.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 7 months ago (9 children)

    you just insulted my entire race!

    ... but also, yes

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago (8 children)

    Dub ist eine ... schleimfrau?

    Ein ... ... glibberwesen?

    ... And that's the extent of my German.

    I will now return to 'Gorlami'.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 7 months ago (7 children)

    sometimes i feel like it, but not currently actually.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 7 months ago* (6 children)

    Hah!

    Are... was I even close to how you'd say 'slime girl' in... what my ancestors call 'Pennsylvania Dutch'?

    ('Deutsch', eh too hard to spell, lets go with 'Dutch', to mean German. ... yeah.)

    Slime-woman?

    Goop-person/being?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 7 months ago (5 children)

    you were surprisingly accurate even

    Dub ist

    It's "Du bist" though - you are

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (4 children)

    Ah, whoops!

    An actual rookie mistake, hahaha!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 7 months ago (3 children)

    no, a rookie mistake would be to move diagonally when you can only move straight

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (2 children)

    Hrm.

    I think I'll try spinning, thats a good trick!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 7 months ago* (1 child)

    fun fact: when a rook spins, it's still in the same configuration afterwards, no matter what angle it spins by. This is because rooks fulfill the S(2π) supersymmetry and when you rotate them, it's still the same state. This is why rooks don't lose any energy when they spin around! In fact many say they have their round shape due to being molded while spinning, similar to a potter's wheel. Anyways that gains them their special power which is they can store large amounts of magnetic energy in the field due to circular currents flowing inside them without actually experiencing any resistance. They can then use that magnetic field to power something similar to a magnetic coil gun similar to how a medieval fortress might have shot arrows down from the tower, which gives them their long range and makes them so scary.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago*

    (I have no idea what i'm talking about.)

    And yet I actually follow what you are saying, silly it may be, it is... theoretically, technically sound.

    So for spinning rooks, (especially when accelerated to rotational velocities experienced in a coil gun), to avoid the gimbal lock problem, you can use quaternions to represent their actual orientation, which... more or less, is complexifying their 3D orientation vector into being a 4D object, manipulating it in 4 space, and then solving or reducing the 4D object back to its 3D shadow/original self, to know its 3 space orientation.

    This is particularly helpful when playing any kind of chess that involves more than 2 dimensions, as well as keeping track of long distance ballistic deviation due to projectile wobble, and/or a ballistic trajectory through different ambient pressure/resistance/drag-inducing gradients.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Is it gay if it's cytokinesis?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago

    Love the Junji Ito reference

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    This better not awaken anything in me

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago

    I feel like this makes everything more confusing. You cannot really follow the hair pins through time because the person takes them out of their hair at one time and the alignment isn't in the hair. And step 4 confuses what it says (the sister chromatides almost divided) with what it actually shows (the cells almost divided).

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 7 months ago

    That's adorable

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 7 months ago* (3 children)

    Cytokinesis is part of cell division, but it's distinctively not part of mitosis.

    Eta: Cytokinesis takes place during the M phase simultaneously with PMAT, but is a separate part of the cellular process. 

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    yeah the drawing was done by an artist who learned about mitosis on the same day that they did the drawing ...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    Based on the hair clips in the last step, wouldn’t this actually be an illustration of meiosis?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 7 months ago (1 child)

    So does the mother cell no longer exist, or is she her own daughters and still totally the same amoeba lady, just twice?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago

    So sad that Abbey & Brittany are stuck at stage 4.

  • source
  • [–] -4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

    Humankind is now in Metaphase,

    soon ( March/April, looks-like when the Middle-East goes kablooey ) to be in Anaphase: Regional Consolidation Stage, of The Great Filter's 1st Yang Stage, aka the "White Serpent Time" in the American Indians' religion, & the "White Horse Time" in the Christian's book of Revelation.

    Telophase will be complete in 7y after Anaphase begins, then

    Cytokinesis, 2 mutually-exclusive "humankind"s occupying the same planet, & the global-deathmatch begins, aka the "Red Serpent Time" & the "Red Horse Time/WAR", ie The Great Filter's 2nd Yang Stage.

    Humankind's whole-species-equivalent-to-puberty: the mathematically inescapable Great Filter.

    It's our collective unconscious-mind's ego & ignorance that's the cause of it, btw, not the "religions".

    The "religions" are only "makeup" on it: styling, not the root-problem/cause.

    Humankind's species-collective-ignorance/ego is the root-problem/cause.

    All worlds with people like us go through the same growing-up-test, The Great Filter.

    Some survive, statistically..

    _ /\ _

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 7 months ago*

    Revelations is not a prophecy about today and cannot describe anything contemporary to us. It was a political allegory about what was going on at the time of it's writing.

    March/April, looks-like when the Middle-East goes kablooey ... 2 mutually-exclusive "humankind"s occupying the same planet, & the global-deathmatch begins

    When none of this happens i hope you will abandon these ideas and not trying to modify them.

  • source
  • parent