top 99 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 180 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (25 children)

I don't understand how they cant see that once we leave we leave. If you bite into that and hate it; its a cycle broken and we we unlikely to trust the product ever again.

  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 116 points 8 months ago

    It's what happened with Bassets Winegums. Used to be my absolute favourite candy. Wife came back from the UK with a box,I opened it and the taste was... Different. Googled - turns out they changed the recipe after being purchased by some large conglomerate. I haven't had one of their candies since 13 years ago. Fucking idiots.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    The New Coke fiasco begs to differ.

    The cynic in me imagines that they switch away from real chocolate, everyone will hate it, they'll release a new product line that proclaims it uses real chocolate, but charge a premium for it, and people will buy it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    What premium am I paying for any Coke vs. other name brand soda?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (1 child)

    I don't understand the question.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago*

    Ah, okay, you're putting two points together.

    I think people came back to original Coke because they were looking for a specific flavor. When they had no reason to buy Coke, their options were limited - buy what they can get, or stop drinking colas. I kept on with Coke, but was happy when they changed back. As an older person now, I'd make a different choice.

    As for quality vs. taste people will buy what they find acceptable for the price, with a minimum standard that is generally very individual. This has been the case for a very long time, and cocoa is pretty expensive. It isn't surprising that some people will pay more and higher quantities of expensive ingredients lead to a more expensive product. Toss in inflation, and here we are.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    I think we’re talking about very old brands that sell in big numbers because they’ve locked in grocery store shelf space and Halloween combo bag deals. It’s not like every sale is made after a careful taste test.

    Boomers with practically no taste buds left will still buy these to hand out to trick or treaters because they remember them being good 40 years ago. Meanwhile the manufacturer can add millions in profit by shaving costs here and there, because they operate at such huge volume. Their brand is mature and their market is saturated. They can’t really grow sales anymore so all they can do to juice profits is cut costs.

    I’m not justifying their way of thinking, just saying this is why they don’t behave as if every single candy must taste amazing. Their profits keep chugging without that. And if you aren’t growing profits, you’re dead. So blame capitalism for the underlying reasons for why they can’t just leave well enough alone.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 8 months ago (13 children)

    Well if they all do it, who are ya gonna run to?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    The thing is, they won't ALL do it. The big names will. Real chocolate will become more of a luxury thing you have less often (which, to be fair is probably a good thing) and the established brands might survive on some blind brand loyalty, or die out.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago

    You’re using the future tense but this is pretty much the way it already is. No one considers hersheys good chocolate. It’s getting slightly worse and people are acting like some goddess has been kicked off her pedestal. Its more like a dead dog has just had one more fly land on it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago

    There are plenty of companies still selling actual chocolate, and since it's chocolate and not chocolate-flavoured sweets I think it'll just become smaller and/or more expensive. Which is fine.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    Not eating candy is always an option for adults with an ounce of self control.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Well swish swish. Even those with an ounce of self control sometimes also allow themselves an ounce of enjoyment. You should try it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Stupidity and short term money.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago* (1 child)

    I'm sure they tested the new recipe on a sample audience long before they put it into mass production which informed them that the recipe change would positively impact their bottom line. Big companies don't make enormous blunders which put them out of business. The social media tech companies we all hate are still around and have billions of users after all the crap they did. Why? Because all of the negative changes they made to their platforms were first tested on a sample of users and the sample kept using it. After all of the recipe downgrades and shrinkflation, you still see the products on the shelves. The only time you ever see an established brand suddenly vanish is when they're bought out by private equity or they're made obsolete by new technology.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    All good points bit missing mine: brands vanish all the time. Companies too.

    It's just that short term money is valued, thats how we run today. It's never about long term services and products.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 76 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    "We are proud to announce our products are completely free of any natural ingredients!"

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 71 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    This has been that way for a while now. Reeses and Hershey's suck. They use a PINCH of cocoa powder and their chocolate tastes and feels like wax. The peanut butter filling is basically peanut flavored sawdust. They spend crazy amounts of money reduce ingredient costs while still maintaining a somewhat edible product. They end up with "chocolate favored wax/oil and sugar". Boycott them. You can get way better chocolate at Aldi.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago*

    you can get better chocolate at aldi and make your own peanut butter cups at home, it's fairly easy

    edit, Ive made pot peanut butter cups before, is delightful.

    low dose, but, infuse the marijuana bud with coconut oil and use the coconut oil in the chocolte when you melt it. You cant put much, but it's fun none the less

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 42 points 8 months ago (11 children)

    I recently had something sold as chocolate that contained 0% cocoa, its just a chunk of palm oil. First time I have ever had chocolate so bad I threw it in the bin. I can also taste it in Cadburys now, or they have increased their palm oil amount since I had eaten it previously.

    I will be checking ingredient lists more often when buying chocolate now. If palm oil is the main ingredient it can fuck off.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (10 children)

    I mean, isn't "white chocolate" 0% cocoa?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 8 months ago (8 children)

    No solids, it should be made of cocoa butter. In the shit one I had they replaced all of the cocoa butter with palm oil. Tbh I don't think they should legally be able to call it chocolate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    Funny how the milk industry fought so hard to ban the use of milk on vegetable products. Now they are all called drink. But there was no confusion to the public just a dick move.

    Yet here where the intention is clear to see something which is not it, this is magically ok.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    Which country did that? Cause here in the US, we still have milk everything. Oat milk, almond milk, soy milk, you name it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago (2 children)

    Many, many places. It's so strongly regulated here, I think they even have to call it goat drink, too! The cow lobby is bullish, I tell you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    Oh yeah I remember that. Because of their pettiness I stopped using milk, only thing I used it for as porridge and I use water instead now. Looked it up and you get the water boiling and can cook it at a higher temperature without it burning to the pan. Ends up fairly creamy still without using cows milk. Also costs less to make.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 40 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    I took two bites and had to spit it out

    That's how I reacted the first time I tasted Hershey's chocolate.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    Inb4: butyric acid

    A somehow necessary ingredient in Hershey's which lingers unpleasantly on the palate, otherwise known as a stomach acid which imbues your vomit with the unmistakeable flavor of vomit

    ^Whyyyyyyyyy^

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Actually this goes back to the early days of Hershey's. As part of their drive to produce affordable chocolate, their main formulation was developed around slightly spoiled milk, which has an acidic taste. That's why all Hershey's chocolate since the beginning of time has had that 'vomit flavor'. Obviously they're not allowed to use spoiled milk anymore, but they wanted to taste the same as it always has. So they add the acid as an ingredient to replicate the same flavor.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 80 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (24 children)

    Guys (and gals), there's simple solution to all that: learn to bake.

    We are a community of makers. We write our apps ourselves, we host our shit by ourselves, we stream our music and our movies by ourselves. So what should we do when bad corporations are taking away our snacks? Make them yourself!

    Recipes are free and open. The tools are not expensive (not much RAM in the oven). There's nothing stopping us.

    So, do we need baking community?

    Edit: So... !baking@lemmy.curiana.net ? It's my self hosted server. Will that work?

  • source
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    Baking is relatively easy, but how do you make your own chocolate? I don't think you can properly do that at home.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    You can, but you also don't have to make it from scratch. Various forms of real, non-ultraprocessed-and-candified chocolate are guaranteed sitting lonely and forgotten in grocery store baking aisles around the world at this very moment. There's also the option of finding a reputable local chocolatier, if you have one. I've never lived anywhere where there aren't at least several local options, if not countless, but maybe I'm just lucky that way. Even if not, there's always online ordering.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    I've seen recipes, which are basically just cocoa butter and cocoa powder, and they seem pretty simple, though I've never tried them.

    Most chocolate "making" just starts with chocolate callets. Melt them, temper it, put it in moulds, and add filling. I've done this, and it's not that difficult. Of course, the quality here depends on the quality of the callets, so if you start with Hershey's (not sure if they even make callets), it'll still taste like vomit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    I recently made brownies from scratch, and they came out so much better than the box brownies that I usually make, that my entire family noticed, and really loved them. It wasn't that much more work than the box, you just had to measure out the flour, sugar, and cocoa, but the difference was huge. Well worth the slight extra effort.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Did you use butter and milk or oil and water in the box mix? That's usually the only difference. The box mix is just flour, cocoa powder, salt, etc. The quality of those ingredients doesn't vary too much.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Butter yes, milk no.

    I saw an old Good Eats episode where Alton Brown put the brownies in for about 15 minutes, took them out for 10 minutes, then put them back in the oven until they were finished. He claimed that the interruption changes the chemical reaction somehow, and makes them better. I've tried it in the past, and they seemed to be marginally better, but it m.not sure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    He frequently does things that make recipes 2% better for 50% more effort. Which is appreciated, but often a little silly. Sometimes though it is well worth it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    Cooking nerd here. You can kind of make your own chocolate.

    You almost certainly can't make chocolate from scratch. You could, in theory do all the steps but even in the old days it was an industrial process and it's nearly impossible to get the quality control tight enough at home. The fermentation, roasting, and grinding steps all have to be done under very precise conditions or you won't get good chocolate.

    You could just go really old school and use the Aztec recipes but that's not "chocolate" as most people would know it. It's more like a spiced tea.

    Home cooks can buy chocolate (it's worth it to splurge and get nice chocolate if you're going through this much trouble) and mix it and shape it. You can make a wide array of flavored ganaches, coat things in chocolate, fill chocolate shells with stuff, etc.

    The hardest part is tempering. Chocolate is actually a crystal. The short version is that if you don't control that crystal formation through careful temperature and movement control, your chocolate will get weird and chalky; if you get that all right it's smooth and snappy. There are books and videos on it but you'll need to mess up a bunch of batches before you learn it.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 35 points 8 months ago

    Club, one of my childhood favourites with the advert song of "If you like a lot of chocolate on your biscuit, join our club" -- no longer has enough cocoa to be legally called chocolate.

    Madness.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c86737yg3jlo

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 8 months ago

    There is no corner they aren't willing to cut.

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Well obviously it sucks that the fake cocoa is disgusting, but I have to say I kinda am for the effort of trying to create an alternative, given how the cocoa producers are notorious for exploiting child labor and how terrible it is for the environment

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Buy Tonys. The alternatives are bad for you

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 child)

    Another way of reminding us there is enshittification.

    Nearly no one touches the chocolates at most supermarkets I went to. Far cry from when 40 years ago, workers from overseas would include chocolate bars in care packages.

    That real cocoa are mostly from developing countries, not all are politically stable.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 27 points 8 months ago (8 children)

    It's fascinating how hard some sectors are fighting to forbid replacement meats or milks to call themselves steak or milk. But those products barely resembling the original name are completely allowed to call themselves chocolate or fruit juice (based on some concentrate and some other stuff).

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    This might be the case in the US. In the EU, chocolate is taken much more seriously. This vomit-flavored abomination called Hersheys "chocolate" is probably illegal and unfit for human consumption here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago

    The reason Hersheys tastes like vomit actually isn’t because of the (lack of) cocoa. It’s because they use intentionally soured milk in their chocolate.

    Basically, a company as large as Hershey strives for consistency instead of quality. And that means they need a consistent source of milk. The problem is obviously that milk sours fairly quickly. So rather than using inconsistent milk (which may be in various states of souring), they use butyric acid to intentionally sour the milk. And butyric acid is also found in vomit.

    So when Europeans try American chocolate, they’re often disgusted by the taste. Americans have grown up expecting that tangy taste in chocolate, but Europeans haven’t. So it’s all they focus on, and it inevitably ends up with them thinking that all American chocolate just tastes like vomit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 8 months ago*

    it's about marketing.

    people don't buy what is not familiar. so it's very much in their interest to market these replacements as familiar products.

    food is a emotional thing, it's not logical of thoughtful. people typically only eat what they know or perceive to be good based on what others eat.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    They aren't. Next time you're at the store, actually look at what the label says. It'll be a big "CHOCOLATE" and then a smaller "flavored candy".

    Fruit juice from concentrate is still 100% fruit juice though. It just had the water removed and re-added.
    But they do often make it "cranberry juice cocktail", which is some part cranberry juice and mostly apple juice.

    And just this week I saw orange juice that was also part pear and apple juice, but that's probably because of citrus greening killing the orange groves.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›