top 32 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 37 points 8 months ago (5 children)

As someone who was a teenager when the internet became a thing, I agree there should be a debate on the topic. Because as I see it, our brains got broken differently after the internet.

There is a healthy way to approach this. There is a minimum age for social media. Buuuut.... I'm not the one who should be saying what that is.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 69 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    the problem here is that all politicians are reallty after is "age verification" which is just an excuse to deannonymize the intenet and track everyone

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    That's exactly it. It has nothing to do with protecting children, it's sole purpose is to get rid of any semblance of privacy

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

    Oh great it's time for that again. So many things they might try to do to protect the children. So few of them that would not do more harm than good.

    Please let this government fall before they fuck it up too badly, and the same to its successor. Delay is all we can do, and hope we can hold them off long enough for the utter stupidity of "age verification" systems to become obvious to even the politicians as its failure in e.g. the UK continues to play out.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 8 months ago

    Stupid as fuck

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 8 months ago

    So, mass surveillance for everyone under the guise of "think of the children!" while billionaires are trafficking and raping them.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Really hate the way the internet is moving and the increasing control governments are enforcing and reaching for.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago

    Why I am moving to Mastodon (sorta I don’t use it much), Lemmy (yes I know it is part of Mastodon), I want to move to peertube but that is a hard thing at least that is how I am finding it. My computers are raspberry pis so I do not use MacOS or Windows, sadly I still use an iPad and iPhone as I do not have the money to change them yet. I hide as much about myself from the ad market with piholes and single use email addresses with my own domain. I have a VPN back to my LAN so that when I am away I still get all the ad blocking. I realize that this is blocking the ad market and not the government, but I am going to make it as hard as possible for governments to check me and my internet habits out as hard as possible.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    I'm still confused as to how this has anything to do with the population at large. Monitor your fucking kids.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    "Protect the kids" is just the current excuse to erode privacy and implement further government surveillance measures. If this was truly about protecting children they'd be regulating social media companies to stop them from being so harmful in the first place.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    “Monitor your kids” hasn’t really been good enough and now we are seeing literal cognitive decline due to social media use in youth. I agree that global age verification is a privacy violation, but there ARE genuine problems with unrestricted social media use for youth.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    Seriously, just be an actual parent to your children and let adults be able to enjoy things without everything being censored to shit because you use the internet as a babysitter.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    As a millenial I grew up on the internet and I watched my own children navigate an ever evolving internet, especially social media. My home did not allow social media before 16 as I agree there is an age limit. The problem is how do we verify this? Requiring ID for anything on the internet is a slippery slope that politicians seem all too happy to throw us down.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 8 months ago

    We set the standard for parents and other adults and institutions like we do for tobacco. That makes it easier for adults to enforce the ban. It's much easier to enforce no social rule when it's illegal than when it isn't.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago

    While I agree kids should not have Facebook or IG, I don't really think it's up to the government to decide. Parent your kids.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Weird at how we’re not talking about the technology behind social media aka algorithms that are provoke a specific emotion. Since it’s those algorithms that is hurting children and society.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 8 months ago*

    Its definitely not the unmitigated housing shortage, the dramatic rise in food prices, the dramatic drop in healthcare access, double digit youth unemployment after mass immigration and LMIA scams.

    Its just social media making the youth upset, they dont realize their lives are great.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    Does this mean going back to a BBS and FidoNet?

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Even if they somehow implement this in an anonymous way (let's be real, it's the government), it would have to be through government services and a lot of people that use social media, specifically Indigenous people, well, let's just say, do not trust the government. So, if this is implemented in a mature, reasonable way without any involvement from the private sector; you are still excluding a significant portion of the populace just by having the government involved.

    This should never have even been brought up. It's idiotic.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Age verification not mentioned. Wake me up when it is.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 8 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] -1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    The minimum age for social media should be 105..

    Change my mind.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Seeing how you posted this thought on social media how old are you?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    I'm definitely under 105.

    I'm aware of the cognitive dissidence, but I can still believe social media should be banned (or at least banned in most of it's current forms) while still using it.

    I am also reliant on a personal automobile while simultaneously believing people should not have to be reliant on personal automobiles.

  • source
  • parent